WaterVerge

Is Franklin Boro-1906, NJ Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B-, with 23 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

6K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: NJ1906002
Overall Score
73 / 100
Violations
23 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#213 of 435 in New Jersey Top 65% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
B-GRADE
Water Quality Grade
73/100
waterverge.com
B- 73/100

Franklin Boro-1906, NJ — Water Quality Report

Franklin Boro-1906's drinking water received a grade of B- (73 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 5,800 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.6 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals.

The system has 104 violations on record, including 6 health-based violations. 23 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Franklin Boro-1906's water

Franklin Boro-1906 ranks #213 out of 435 cities in New Jersey for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state.

Franklin Boro-1906 relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

The system has seen 11 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
73 out of 100 Grade B-
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
27/45
C
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 2.6 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
16/20
B
No PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
5/10
D
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Franklin Boro-1906, NJ water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Franklin Boro-1906's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B- (73/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 5,800 residents using groundwater (wells).

23
Active Violations
2.6 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
None
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Franklin Boro-1906

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Franklin Boro-1906's water quality assessment. Grade: B- (73/100).

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Chlorine, Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Disaster
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4614). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3573). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Franklin Boro-1906's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 2.6 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Violation history

Franklin Boro-1906's water system has 104 total violations on record, including 6 health-based violations. 23 remain unresolved. 11 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MROtherRPTMONMCLTT
Most recent violations:
Jul 2024 Chlorine Resolved
Jul 2024 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Jan 2024 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open
Dec 2023 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Oct 2023 TTHM Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Sussex County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1975. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Wallkill R At Scott Road At Franklin, Pequannock River At Oak Ridge, East Branch Paulins Kill Near Lafayette.

REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-4614
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3573
TROPICAL STORM ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA DR-4574

Where does Franklin Boro-1906's water come from?

Franklin Boro-1906's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 5,800 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Wallkill R At Scott Road At Franklin (river), Pequannock River At Oak Ridge (river), East Branch Paulins Kill Near Lafayette (river).

What Franklin Boro-1906 residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Franklin Boro-1906's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Franklin Boro-1906's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
2.6 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 17% of limit
Safe Level
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
0.7 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 1% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 0.2 µg/LHAA9: 0.9 µg/L
Manganese
Inorganic
Detected
8.4 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 17% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
0
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

104
Total violations
6
Health-based
23
Active / unresolved
Jul 2024
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

104 Total
23 Active
6 Health-based
81 Resolved
1 SNC
Violations by category
Inorganic Chemicals
24
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
20
Consumer Confidence Rule
14
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
12
Total Coliform Rule
8
Jul 2024 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jan 2024 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Sep 2022 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2021 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2019 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2016 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2015 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2013 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2013 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2013 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2012 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2012 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jun 2011 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2005 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Showing 20 of 104 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D1 — moderate drought

Sussex County is currently in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

13.7%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
7
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Sep 2021
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Sussex County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1975. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2021
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #4614
Sep 2021
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #3573
Dec 2020
TROPICAL STORM ISAIAS
Hurricane FEMA #4574
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #4086
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3354
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #4021

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.6 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 31.4 ppb from 1992 (34.0 ppb) to 2025 (2.6 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how Franklin Boro-1906 compares by contaminant

Explore where Franklin Boro-1906 ranks among all New Jersey cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
5,800
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Franklin Boro-1906's water comes from

Groundwater

Franklin Boro-1906's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 5,800 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Franklin Boro-1906

Franklin Boro-1906 is located near 3 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Wallkill R At Scott Road At Franklin
river
Pequannock River At Oak Ridge
river
East Branch Paulins Kill Near Lafayette
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Franklin Boro-1906

System Name PWSID Population Source
FRANKLIN BD OF PUBLIC WORKS NJ1906002 5,500 GW
HILLSIDE ESTATES AT FRANKLIN NJ1906001 300 GW
Regional Comparison

How Franklin Boro-1906 compares

Full New Jersey rankings →

Franklin Boro-1906's score of 73/100 is above the average of 63/100 among major New Jersey cities. It outscores 10 of 10 nearby cities.

Franklin Boro-1906 (this city)
73
New Jersey avg
63
City Profile

About Franklin Boro-1906, NJ

Wikipedia →

Franklin is a borough in Sussex County, in the U.S. state of New Jersey. As of the 2020 United States census, the borough's population was 4,912, a decrease of 133 (−2.6%) from the 2010 census count of 5,045, which in turn reflected a decline of 115 (−2.2%) from the 5,160 counted in the 2000 census.

Economic Profile
$121,193
Median Income
$400,607
Median Home Value
$1,841/mo
Median Rent
5.4%
Unemployment
Community
46.6
Median Age
49
People / sq mi
36.7%
College Educated
92.4%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Franklin Boro-1906, NJ tap water safe to drink?

Franklin Boro-1906's water quality earned a grade of B- (73/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #213 out of 435 cities tested in New Jersey.

What contaminants are in Franklin Boro-1906's water?

Lead was measured at 2.6 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 104 violations are on record.

How is Franklin Boro-1906's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Franklin Boro-1906?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Franklin Boro-1906's water come from?

Franklin Boro-1906's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 5,800 residents.

What health violations has Franklin Boro-1906's water system had?

Franklin Boro-1906 has 6 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 23 violations remain unresolved.

Is Franklin Boro-1906's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Franklin Boro-1906 uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 104 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Franklin Boro-1906's water compare to other cities?

Franklin Boro-1906 ranks #213 out of 435 cities in New Jersey (better than 51% of state cities) and #10187 out of 15744 cities nationally (35th percentile). The grade of B- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.