Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Cliffside Park Boro-0206, NJ Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B- — but PFOA, NDMA and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

3 contaminants over a legal limit
11.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile
3 unresolved violations
793K people served by 1 water system

PWSID NJ0238001 · high data confidence · private utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 72.3 / 100

#221 of 426New Jersey cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Cliffside Park Boro-0206 water safe?

Cliffside Park Boro-0206's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B- (72.3/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 792,713 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

PFOA is over its legal limit

Measured at 0.0140 µg/L against the EPA MCL of 0.004 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
Context

793K people, 1 system

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

Lead is approaching its limit

Measured at 11.0 ppb — 73% of the 15 ppb limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Cliffside Park Boro-0206's drinking water received a grade of B- (72.3 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 792,713 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 11.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. UCMR 5 testing detected 8 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 57 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 3 remain unresolved.

Cliffside Park Boro-0206 ranks #221 out of 426 cities in New Jersey for water quality, placing it below average in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.33 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. As a major metropolitan system serving over 793K residents, Cliffside Park Boro-0206 faces large-scale infrastructure challenges including aging pipes and the complexity of treating water across a vast distribution network.

How the 72.3/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
37.3 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at 11.0 ppb (90th percentile).
13 / 20C
Contaminants8 PFAS compounds detected.
10.1 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water

Every contaminant flagged in Cliffside Park Boro-0206, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

10 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over MCL — EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels, which utilities must meet by 2029. These compounds don't break down in the body or the environment. Reverse osmosis (NSF/ANSI 58) or certified granular activated carbon (NSF/ANSI 53) removes them at the tap.
Exceeds MCL What to do →
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
300.0 µg/L 120% of limit
NDMA (N-Nitrosodimethylamine) Disinfection Byproduct
11.0 ng/L 110% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
37.7 µg/L 75% of limit
1,4-Dioxane Organic
0.07 µg/L 21% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
170.0 µg/L 11% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
0.44 µg/L 2% of limit
39 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 17 detected · 2 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 5.53 (above the 1.0 threshold) Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 11.0 15 ppb Inorganic Near Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.014 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.008 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Cliffside Park Boro-0206's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 57 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 3 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 2 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
PFAS8 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water quality assessment. Grade: B- (72.3/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterREMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4614). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterREMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3573). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0510152025EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 14 ppb1996 — 14 ppb1997 — 12 ppb1998 — 13 ppb2001 — 11 ppb2004 — 7.7 ppb2007 — 11 ppb2009 — 11 ppb2012 — 14 ppb2015 — 14 ppb2017 — 11 ppb2018 — 18 ppb2019 — 11 ppb2020 — 8.1 ppb2021 — 6.1 ppb2022 — 5.5 ppb2023 — 7.1 ppb2024 — 9 ppb2025 — 11 ppb1411199220012012201920232025

Down 3 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 11 ppb (2025) — 73% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water comes from

Cliffside Park Boro-0206's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under private ownership.

Delivery

792,713 people

Residents served across Cliffside Park Boro-0206's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by private ownership and serves approximately 792,713 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
VEOLIA WATER NEW JERSEY HACKENSACK NJ0238001 792,713 Surface Water

Water bodies near Cliffside Park Boro-0206

Bronx River · river Hudson River · river Hackensack River · river Lake Tappan At Old Tappan · lake Hackensack River At Rivervale · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Cliffside Park Boro-0206's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Cliffside Park Boro-0206's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Bergen County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA Sep 2021 · DR-4614
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA Sep 2021 · DR-3573
TROPICAL STORM ISAIAS Dec 2020 · DR-4574

Drought

D2 — severe drought

Bergen County is in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity5 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years8 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years12.5%

06How Cliffside Park Boro-0206 compares

Scores for nearby New Jersey cities on one line, with the average marked.

Cliffside Park Boro-0206 (this city)
72.3 · B-

dashed line = New Jersey average (72/100)

Cliffside Park Boro-0206 scores 72.3/100on par with the New Jersey average of 72/100. Full New Jersey rankings →

Bergen water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. Lead detected at 11.0 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Cliffside Park Boro-0206 alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Cliffside Park Boro-0206, NJ tap water safe to drink?

Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water quality earned a grade of B- (72.3/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #221 out of 426 cities tested in New Jersey.

What contaminants are in Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water?

Lead was measured at 11.0 ppb (90th percentile). 8 PFAS compounds were detected. 57 violations are on record.

How is Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Cliffside Park Boro-0206?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water come from?

Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 792,713 residents.

What health violations has Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water system had?

Cliffside Park Boro-0206 has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 3 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Cliffside Park Boro-0206 have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

8 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Cliffside Park Boro-0206's water compare to other cities?

Cliffside Park Boro-0206 ranks #221 out of 426 cities in New Jersey (better than 48% of state cities) and #10204 out of 15382 cities nationally (34th percentile). The grade of B- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Cliffside Park Boro-0206, NJ: Haworth is a borough in Bergen County, in the U.S. state of New Jersey. As of the 2020 United States census, the borough's population was 3,343, a decrease of 39 (−1.2%) from the 2010 census count of 3,382, which in turn reflected a decline of 8 (−0.2%) from the 3,390 counted in the 2000 census. Wikipedia → Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.