Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Ringwood Boro-1611, NJ Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but PFOA, PFOS and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

3 contaminants over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
18 unresolved violations
9K people served by 2 water systems

PWSID NJ1611002 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
F 42.4 / 100

#398 of 426New Jersey cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Ringwood Boro-1611 water safe?

Ringwood Boro-1611's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (42.4/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 9,327 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

PFOA is over its legal limit

Measured at 0.0148 µg/L against the EPA MCL of 0.004 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

Manganese is approaching its limit

Measured at 34.9 µg/L — 70% of the 50 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Ringwood Boro-1611's drinking water received a grade of F (42.4 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 9,327 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 8 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 339 violations on record, including 19 health-based violations. 18 remain unresolved.

Ringwood Boro-1611 ranks #398 out of 426 cities in New Jersey for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.23 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. The system has seen 31 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 42.4/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
Contaminants8 PFAS compounds detected.
10.3 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Ringwood Boro-1611's water

Every contaminant flagged in Ringwood Boro-1611, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

10 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over MCL — EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels, which utilities must meet by 2029. These compounds don't break down in the body or the environment. Reverse osmosis (NSF/ANSI 58) or certified granular activated carbon (NSF/ANSI 53) removes them at the tap.
Exceeds MCL What to do →
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
270.4 µg/L 120% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
34.9 µg/L 70% of limit
1,4-Dioxane Organic
0.10 µg/L 29% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
192.5 µg/L 13% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
1.11 µg/L 5% of limit
38 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 16 detected · 2 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 7.15 (above the 1.0 threshold) Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.013 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.009 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.015 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.014 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.010 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Ringwood Boro-1611's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 339 violations on record, including 19 health-based violations. 18 remain unresolved.

1 of the last ten years was clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

8 health-based in 10 yrs 83 monitoring & paperwork 14 still unresolved
PFAS8 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Ringwood Boro-1611's water quality assessment. Grade: F (42.4/100).
Violation3 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule, E. COLI.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterREMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4614). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0510152025EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 13 ppb1993 — 7.4 ppb1994 — 12 ppb1995 — 9 ppb1996 — 19 ppb1998 — 6 ppb1999 — 10 ppb2000 — 5 ppb2001 — 8 ppb2002 — 11 ppb2003 — 5 ppb2006 — 0 ppb2008 — 0 ppb2009 — 0 ppb2011 — 9 ppb2012 — 2.6 ppb2014 — 3.5 ppb2015 — 2.0 ppb2017 — 5.3 ppb2018 — 2.1 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 5.8 ppb2022 — 3.8 ppb2023 — 4.4 ppb2024 — 8.9 ppb2025 — 4.0 ppb134.0199219992008201720232025

Down 9.0 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 4.0 ppb (2025) — 26% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Ringwood Boro-1611's water comes from

Ringwood Boro-1611's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

9,327 people

Residents served across Ringwood Boro-1611's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 9,327 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
WANAQUE W DEPT. NJ1613002 10,266 Purchased Surface Water
RINGWOOD WATER DEPARTMENT NJ1611002 9,327 Purchased Surface Water

Water bodies near Ringwood Boro-1611

Rockaway River At Main Street At Boonton · river Boonton Reservoir At Boonton · lake Rockaway River Below Reservoir At Boonton · river Pequannock River At Green Pond Junction · river Pequannock River At Macopin Intake Dam · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Ringwood Boro-1611's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Ringwood Boro-1611's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Passaic County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA Sep 2021 · DR-4614
REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA Sep 2021 · DR-3573
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-4086

Drought

D1 — moderate drought

Passaic County is in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years8 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years16.0%

06How Ringwood Boro-1611 compares

Scores for nearby New Jersey cities on one line, with the average marked.

Ringwood Boro-1611 (this city)
42.4 · F

dashed line = New Jersey average (72/100)

Ringwood Boro-1611 scores 42.4/100below the New Jersey average of 72/100. Full New Jersey rankings →

Passaic water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Ringwood Boro-1611's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Ringwood Boro-1611 alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Ringwood Boro-1611, NJ tap water safe to drink?

Ringwood Boro-1611's water quality earned a grade of F (42.4/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #398 out of 426 cities tested in New Jersey.

What contaminants are in Ringwood Boro-1611's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 8 PFAS compounds were detected. 339 violations are on record.

How is Ringwood Boro-1611's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Ringwood Boro-1611?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Ringwood Boro-1611's water come from?

Ringwood Boro-1611's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 9,327 residents.

What health violations has Ringwood Boro-1611's water system had?

Ringwood Boro-1611 has 19 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in June 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 18 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Ringwood Boro-1611 have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

8 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Ringwood Boro-1611's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Ringwood Boro-1611's water compare to other cities?

Ringwood Boro-1611 ranks #398 out of 426 cities in New Jersey (better than 7% of state cities) and #14497 out of 15382 cities nationally (6th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Ringwood Boro-1611, NJ: Wanaque is a borough in Passaic County, in the U.S. state of New Jersey. As of the 2020 United States census, the borough's population was 11,317, an increase of 201 (+1.8%) from the 2010 census count of 11,116, which in turn reflected an increase of 850 (+8.3%) from the 10,266 counted in the 2000 census. Wikipedia → Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.