WaterVerge

Is Georgetown, TX Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Lead and Chlorate were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

192K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: TX2460001
Overall Score
39.2 / 100
Violations
40 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Surface water
#1018 of 1067 in Texas Top 97% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
FGRADE
Water Quality Grade
39.2/100
waterverge.com
F 39.2/100

Georgetown, TX — Water Quality Report

Georgetown's drinking water received a grade of F (39.2 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 191,729 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 15.3 ppb (90th percentile), which exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb. UCMR 5 testing detected 8 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 143 violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 40 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Georgetown's water

Georgetown ranks #1018 out of 1067 cities in Texas for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.28 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

Lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb, which typically indicates aging lead service lines or lead solder in the distribution system. An NSF 53-certified filter is strongly recommended for drinking and cooking water.

The system has seen 10 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
39.2 out of 100 Grade F
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
13.8/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
6/20
F
Lead at 15.3 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
10.4/20
D
8 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
5/10
D
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Surface water.
Water Safety

Is Georgetown, TX water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Georgetown's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (39.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 191,729 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

40
Active Violations
15.3 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
8 compounds
PFAS Detected
3 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Georgetown

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
8 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Georgetown's water quality assessment. Grade: F (39.2/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4879). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Georgetown's water supply.

Lead Exceeds Limit
Detected: 15.3 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Lead service line replacement and point-of-use filtration recommended.

PFAS (8 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 17.4000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 8 PFAS compounds in Georgetown's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
lithium 17.4000 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFBA 0.0338 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFPeA 0.0187 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFHxA 0.0101 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

Georgetown's water system has 143 total violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 40 remain unresolved. 10 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

OtherMRTTRPTMCL
Most recent violations:
Oct 2025 Public Notice Open
May 2025 Public Notice Open
Apr 2025 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Jan 2025 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Dec 2024 Public Notice Open

Flood & environmental risk

Williamson County has experienced 3 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Lk Georgetown Nr Georgetown, N Fk San Gabriel Rv Nr Georgetown, S Fk San Gabriel Rv At Georgetown, Berry Ck At Airport Rd Nr Georgetown, San Gabriel Rv Nr Weir.

SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4879
HURRICANE IKE
Hurricane FEMA DR-3294
HURRICANE RITA
Hurricane FEMA DR-1606

Where does Georgetown's water come from?

Georgetown's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 191,729 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Lk Georgetown Nr Georgetown (lake), N Fk San Gabriel Rv Nr Georgetown (river), S Fk San Gabriel Rv At Georgetown (river), Berry Ck At Airport Rd Nr Georgetown (river), San Gabriel Rv Nr Weir (river).

What Georgetown residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Georgetown's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Monitor alerts during storms

Georgetown's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Over Limit
15.3 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · +2% over limit
Exceeds LimitFilter: NSF-53
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
17.4000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
16.7 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 28% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 12.1 µg/LHAA9: 26.5 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.28 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 3% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Elevated
980.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 65% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Detected
22.0 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 44% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
NDMA (N-Nitrosodimethylamine)
Disinfection Byproduct
Detected
3.2 ng/L
CA Public Health Goal: 10 ng/L · 32% of limit
DetectedProbable CarcinogenUCMR 2 Data (2008–2010)
Vanadium
Inorganic
Detected
3.00 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 14% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
1400.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Molybdenum
Inorganic
Detected
2.20 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 40 µg/L · 6% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
17.4 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 29% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
8
Detected
2
Exceed EPA MCL
2.65
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0057 µg/L PFOA max: 0.0049 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

143
Total violations
3
Health-based
40
Active / unresolved
Oct 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

143 Total
40 Active
3 Health-based
103 Resolved
2 SNC
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
63
Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule
17
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
16
Consumer Confidence Rule
12
Lead and Copper Rule
8
Oct 2025 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
May 2025 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Apr 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jan 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2024 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2024 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2020 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jan 2020 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2019 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2019 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jun 2019 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2018 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2017 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Apr 2017 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Dec 2016 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Showing 20 of 143 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Georgetown

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Georgetown, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 22 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
TECO-WESTINGHOUSE MOTOR CO
Electrical Equipment · NA
ROUND ROCK, TX78681
Copper226.8 mi
JARRELL PLANT
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · LONE STAR CONCRETE LLC
JARRELL, TX76537
9.7 mi
TXI-GEORGETOWN READY MIX
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
GEORGETOWN, TX78626
3.2 mi
CENTEX MATERIALS - GEORGETOWN RMX
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · EAGLE MATERIALS INC
GEORGETOWN, TX78633
9.4 mi
RONALD REAGAN CBP
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · CRH AMERICAS INC
GEORGETOWN, TX78633
9.4 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Burnet County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
21.1%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

3
Declared disasters
Jul 2025
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Williamson County has experienced 3 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Jul 2025
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4879
Sep 2008
HURRICANE IKE
Hurricane FEMA #3294
Sep 2005
HURRICANE RITA
Hurricane FEMA #1606

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Georgetown's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead level (15.3 ppb) exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb
Read our guide →
🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 15.3 15 ppb Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 17.400 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.034 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.010 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.010 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.005 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.006 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.019 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 5.1 ppb from 1992 (10.2 ppb) to 2025 (15.3 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how Georgetown compares by contaminant

Explore where Georgetown ranks among all Texas cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
191,729
Water Systems
2
Source breakdown
Surface Water
1
Groundwater
1
Water Source

Where Georgetown's water comes from

Surface Water

Georgetown's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 191,729 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Georgetown

Georgetown is located near 5 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Lk Georgetown Nr Georgetown
lake
N Fk San Gabriel Rv Nr Georgetown
river
S Fk San Gabriel Rv At Georgetown
river
Berry Ck At Airport Rd Nr Georgetown
river
San Gabriel Rv Nr Weir
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Georgetown

System Name PWSID Population Source
CITY OF GEORGETOWN TX2460001 191,639 SW
PATRIOT RV PARK BURNET TX0270088 90 GW
Regional Comparison

How Georgetown compares

Full Texas rankings →

Georgetown's score of 39.2/100 is below the average of 46/100 among major Texas cities. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities.

Georgetown (this city)
39.2
Houston
27.8
Austin
31.2
Dallas
36.2
Fort Worth
34.5
Texas avg
46
City Profile

About Georgetown, TX

Wikipedia →

Georgetown is a city in Texas and the county seat of Williamson County, Texas, United States. The population was 67,176 at the 2020 census, and according to 2024 census estimates, the city is estimated to have a population of 101,344. It is 30 miles (48 km) north of Austin and is part of the Austin–Round Rock–San Marcos metropolitan statistical area.

Economic Profile
$87,465
Median Income
$361,603
Median Home Value
$1,575/mo
Median Rent
5.7%
Unemployment
Community
44.7
Median Age
479
People / sq mi
48%
College Educated
71.6%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Georgetown, TX tap water safe to drink?

Georgetown's water quality earned a grade of F (39.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #1018 out of 1067 cities tested in Texas.

What contaminants are in Georgetown's water?

Lead was measured at 15.3 ppb (90th percentile). 8 PFAS compounds were detected. 143 violations are on record.

How is Georgetown's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Georgetown?

Yes — lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. We recommend an NSF 53-certified filter or reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Georgetown's water come from?

Georgetown's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 191,729 residents.

What health violations has Georgetown's water system had?

Georgetown has 3 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 40 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Georgetown have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

8 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Georgetown's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Georgetown's water compare to other cities?

Georgetown ranks #1018 out of 1067 cities in Texas (better than 5% of state cities) and #15256 out of 15744 cities nationally (3th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.