WaterVerge
PFAS Contamination

PFAS in Oklahoma Drinking Water

Ranked by number of PFAS compounds detected · Data from EPA SDWIS & UCMR

125
Cities Tested
12
Exceeds Limit
10%
% Exceeds Limit
1.4 compounds
State Avg
▼ 11% vs national
vs National
351
Health Violations

PFAS in Oklahoma: what the data shows

Oklahoma has 125 cities with PFAS monitoring data from the EPA's UCMR 5 program. PFAS ("forever chemicals") were detected in 85 of those cities (68%), with some cities exceeding the EPA's 2024 maximum contaminant levels of 4 ppt. The state average is better than the national average. 12 cities exceed the EPA MCL for at least one PFAS compound. PFAS are linked to cancer, immune system disruption, and developmental issues. The 2024 EPA rule requires water systems exceeding the MCL to notify customers and reduce levels by 2029. PFAS data comes from the EPA's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 5 (UCMR 5), which required large water systems to test for 29 PFAS compounds between 2023–2025. Not all systems have completed testing — cities without data may still have PFAS present.

Cities exceeding EPA MCL (4 ppt each)

Oklahoma
10%
12 of 125 cities
▼ 11% below national rate (better)
National avg
21%
1662 of 7853 cities

PFAS data across Oklahoma

Each dot is a city, colored by overall water quality grade. PFAS-tested cities are shown; those exceeding the 4 ppt EPA MCL appear in red. Size reflects population served.

All Oklahoma cities ranked by pfas level

# City Level Level Exceeds? Violations Grade
1 Edmond 7 compounds
Yes 86
F
2 Stillwater 7 compounds
Yes 72
F
3 Broken Arrow 6 compounds
Yes 113
F
4 Guthrie 6 compounds
Yes 45
F
5 Coweta 6 compounds
Yes 180
D
6 Ardmore 5 compounds
No 188
F
7 Ponca City 5 compounds
Yes 23
F
8 Duncan 5 compounds
No 150
D+
9 Bethany 5 compounds
Yes 14
B+
10 Newkirk 5 compounds
Yes 39
F
11 Del City 4 compounds
No 12
F
12 Piedmont 4 compounds
No 32
C-
13 Nowata 4 compounds
Yes 254
F
14 Tuttle 4 compounds
No 46
D
15 Oklahoma City 3 compounds
No 56
F
16 Norman 3 compounds
No 52
F
17 Altus 3 compounds
No 162
D
18 Tahlequah 3 compounds
No 56
F
19 Eufaula 3 compounds
No 374
F
20 Hulbert 3 compounds
No 117
D
21 Earlsboro 3 compounds
Yes 4
C+
22 Claremore 2 compounds
No 153
F
23 Bartlesville 2 compounds
No 217
F
24 Shawnee 2 compounds
No 124
D
25 Durant 2 compounds
No 104
D
26 Pryor 2 compounds
Yes 17
D
27 Hastings 2 compounds
No 63
D+
28 Newcastle 2 compounds
No 5
A-
29 Tecumseh 2 compounds
No 142
F
30 Noble 2 compounds
No 160
D
31 Frederick 2 compounds
No 104
D+
32 Hobart 2 compounds
No 9
A
33 Midwest City 1 compounds
No 11
B+
34 Moore 1 compounds
No 53
F
35 Enid 1 compounds
No 33
F
36 Mcalester 1 compounds
No 670
F
37 Yukon 1 compounds
No 18
D
38 El Reno 1 compounds
No 49
D
39 Mustang 1 compounds
No 9
C+
40 Chickasha 1 compounds
No 79
F
41 Woodward 1 compounds
No 55
D
42 Skiatook 1 compounds
No 72
B-
43 Miami 1 compounds
No 11
D
44 Elk City 1 compounds
No 5
D
45 Vinita 1 compounds
No 114
D
46 Guymon 1 compounds
No 10
A-
47 Checotah 1 compounds
No 365
D
48 Marlow 1 compounds
No 11
B
49 Weatherford 1 compounds
No 71
D
50 Mounds 1 compounds
No 219
D+
51 Henryetta 1 compounds
No 116
F
52 Pauls Valley 1 compounds
No 103
C-
53 Clinton 1 compounds
No 31
D+
54 Blackwell 1 compounds
No 65
D+
55 Chouteau 1 compounds
Yes 9
B-
56 Oologah 1 compounds
No 32
B-
57 Perry 1 compounds
No 129
D
58 Okemah 1 compounds
No 71
D
59 Seminole 1 compounds
No 4
A
60 Purcell 1 compounds
No 1
A-
61 Mannford 1 compounds
No 93
B-
62 Kellyville 1 compounds
No 32
B-
63 Alva 1 compounds
No 6
B-
64 Carnegie 1 compounds
No 9
B
65 Holdenville 1 compounds
No 148
D+
66 Kingfisher 1 compounds
No 38
D
67 Porum 1 compounds
No 45
B-
68 Lone Grove 1 compounds
No 4
B+
69 Pocola 1 compounds
No 43
D+
70 Harrah 1 compounds
No 61
D
71 Amber 1 compounds
No 30
D
72 Sayre 1 compounds
No 2
A
73 Wewoka 1 compounds
No 340
D+
74 Adair 1 compounds
No 35
B+
75 Choctaw 1 compounds
No 3
F
76 Nichols Hills 1 compounds
No 21
D
77 Dewey 1 compounds
No 23
F
78 Spencer 1 compounds
No 5
C
79 Bristow 1 compounds
No 5
D
80 Heavener 1 compounds
No 59
D
81 Fairland 1 compounds
No 11
D
82 Watonga 1 compounds
No 27
C+
83 Wyandotte 1 compounds
No 5
D
84 Byron 1 compounds
No 33
B
85 Hydro 1 compounds
No 11
C-
86 Tulsa 0 compounds
No 6
D
87 Lawton 0 compounds
No 23
F
88 Muskogee 0 compounds
No 246
D
89 Ada 0 compounds
No 6
B-
90 Collinsville 0 compounds
No 24
C+
91 Sand Springs 0 compounds
No 20
B
92 Jenks 0 compounds
No 31
B-
93 Sapulpa 0 compounds
No 85
D
94 Sallisaw 0 compounds
No 29
D+
95 Madill 0 compounds
No 178
F
96 Owasso 0 compounds
No 8
C+
97 Fort Sill 0 compounds
No 4
A
98 Bixby 0 compounds
No 1
B
99 Wagoner 0 compounds
No 141
F
100 Okmulgee 0 compounds
No 262
D
101 Spiro 0 compounds
No 166
D+
102 Glenpool 0 compounds
No 9
A
103 Broken Bow 0 compounds
No 122
F
104 Sulphur 0 compounds
No 2
A-
105 Poteau 0 compounds
No 56
D
106 Cushing 0 compounds
No 1
A-
107 Grove 0 compounds
No 20
D
108 Fort Gibson 0 compounds
No 153
F
109 Antlers 0 compounds
No 229
D+
110 Idabel 0 compounds
No 123
D
111 Anadarko 0 compounds
No 83
D+
112 Hartshorne 0 compounds
No 103
D+
113 Mead 0 compounds
No 106
D+
114 Ketchum 0 compounds
No 5
A
115 Hugo 0 compounds
No 166
D+
116 Wister 0 compounds
No 84
D
117 Haworth 0 compounds
No 67
D
118 Big Cabin 0 compounds
No 39
D+
119 Pawhuska 0 compounds
No 34
D+
120 Afton 0 compounds
No 89
F
121 Ramona 0 compounds
No 42
D
122 Oktaha 0 compounds
No 67
D+
123 Garvin 0 compounds
No 43
D
124 Valliant 0 compounds
No 54
D
125 Okay 0 compounds
No 63
D+

Frequently asked questions about pfas in Oklahoma

Does Oklahoma tap water contain PFAS?

PFAS were detected in 85 of 125 Oklahoma cities tested under EPA's UCMR 5 program. 12 cities exceed the 2024 EPA MCL of 4 ppt for individual PFAS compounds.

How can I remove PFAS from my drinking water in Oklahoma?

Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are the most effective at removing PFAS, typically removing 90%+ of compounds. High-quality activated carbon block filters (NSF 58-certified for RO, or NSF 53 for solid carbon) also provide significant reduction. Standard pitcher filters vary widely in PFAS removal.