Is Sugar Land, TX Tap Water Safe to Drink?
Graded F — but Manganese, Vanadium and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓
37.2/100
waterverge.com Sugar Land, TX — Water Quality Report
Sugar Land's drinking water received a grade of F (37.2 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 30 water systems serve approximately 176,205 residents using surface water.
Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 9 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.
The system has 224 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 86 remain unresolved.
What to know about Sugar Land's water
Sugar Land ranks #1038 out of 1067 cities in Texas for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.
The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.
Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.
Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 2.10 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.
The system has seen 60 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.
Water quality score
See methodology →Is Sugar Land, TX water safe to drink?
Sugar Land's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (37.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 30 water systems serve approximately 176,205 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).
Recent water quality updates for Sugar Land
A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.
PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Sugar Land's water quality assessment. Grade: F (37.2/100).
Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.
Contaminants: Public Notice.
Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule, Consumer Confidence Rule, Chlorine.
Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4798). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Key contaminant findings
Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Sugar Land's water supply.
Well within EPA limits.
PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.
PFAS "forever chemicals" detected
UCMR 5 testing found 9 PFAS compounds in Sugar Land's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.
Violation history
Sugar Land's water system has 224 total violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 86 remain unresolved. 60 violations were issued in the last 5 years.
Flood & environmental risk
Fort Bend County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2007. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Buffalo Bayou Nr Fulshear, Mason Ck At Prince Ck Court Nr Houston, Clodine Ditch At Noble Rd Nr Addicks, Buffalo Bayou At State Hwy 6 Nr Addicks, Buffalo Bayou Nr Addicks.
Where does Sugar Land's water come from?
Sugar Land's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 30 water systems serving approximately 176,205 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Buffalo Bayou Nr Fulshear (river), Mason Ck At Prince Ck Court Nr Houston (river), Clodine Ditch At Noble Rd Nr Addicks (river), Buffalo Bayou At State Hwy 6 Nr Addicks (river), Buffalo Bayou Nr Addicks (river).
What Sugar Land residents can do
Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Sugar Land's water.
Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.
Sugar Land's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.
Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.
Top contaminants to know
View all ↓Forever chemicals overview
National PFAS report →Violation summary
Violations & advisories
Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Sugar Land
Industrial polluters nearby
Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Sugar Land, ranked by pounds discharged annually.
Total reported releases to surface water: 1,509 lbs
| Facility | Top chemical | To surface water (lbs/yr) | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|
W.A. PARISH ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION THOMPSONS, TX77481 | Manganese compounds | 1,509 | 7.4 mi |
CINCO PLANT RICHMOND, TX77407 | Lead | 0 | 9.5 mi |
RICHMOND PLANT RICHMOND, TX77469 | Lead | 0 | 4.6 mi |
SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS MISSOURI CITY (MIS) MISSOURI CITY, TX77459 | — | — | 6.0 mi |
443 - RICHMOND OILSEEDS RICHMOND, TX77469 | — | — | 8.2 mi |
Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023
Superfund sites within 10 miles of Sugar Land
Superfund sites nearby
Federally tracked hazardous-waste sites on the EPA National Priorities List. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.
- CRYSTAL CHEMICAL CO9.8 mi
Source: EPA Superfund National Priorities List
Drought conditions
D2 — severe droughtBrazoria County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.
Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.
Flood & disaster history
Fort Bend County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2007. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.
Recommended water filters
Based on contaminants detected in Sugar Land's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.
Full contaminants report
| Contaminant | Detected Level | EPA Limit | Unit | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (90th percentile) LeadHeavy Metal A toxic heavy metal that can leach into drinking water from older pipes, solder, and fixtures. No amount of lead in water is considered safe. Health EffectsBrain and nervous system damage in children, kidney damage, high blood pressure, and reproductive problems in adults. EPA Limit15 ppb action level Common SourcesCorrosion of lead pipes, lead solder, brass faucets, and household plumbing. | 0.0 | 15 | ppb | Inorganic | Safe |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 4:2 FTS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 6:2 FTS 6:2 FTSPFAS A fluorotelomer sulfonate commonly found at sites contaminated with aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used in firefighting. Health EffectsPotential liver toxicity and endocrine disruption. Less studied but identified as a contaminant of concern. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), airports, military bases, and industrial facilities. | 0.672 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| 8:2 FTS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| ADONA | 0.003 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| HFPO-DA HFPO-DA (GenX)PFAS A replacement for PFOA in manufacturing, marketed as safer but still a persistent "forever chemical." Also known as GenX. Health EffectsLiver and kidney effects, reproductive toxicity, immune system effects, and potential cancer risk. EPA Limit10 ppt MCL Common SourcesFluoropolymer manufacturing (used as PFOA replacement), industrial wastewater discharge. | ND | 0.01 | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| lithium LithiumInorganic A naturally occurring alkali metal found in groundwater. Monitored under UCMR 5 to assess occurrence in drinking water. Health EffectsKidney effects at high doses. Low-level exposure effects under study; some research suggests neurological effects. EPA LimitNo MCL (monitoring only under UCMR 5) Common SourcesNatural mineral deposits, geothermal water, and industrial discharge. | 39.800 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| NEtFOSAA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| NFDHA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| NMeFOSAA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFBA PFBAPFAS One of the shortest-chain PFAS compounds. Very mobile in water and difficult to remove with standard filtration. Health EffectsThyroid effects, potential developmental toxicity. Shorter half-life in body than long-chain PFAS. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesDegradation of longer-chain PFAS, industrial discharge, and firefighting foam. | 0.075 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFBS PFBSPFAS A short-chain PFAS used as a replacement for PFOS. While it clears the body faster than long-chain PFAS, it still persists in the environment. Health EffectsThyroid effects, reproductive and developmental toxicity, kidney effects. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam, and as a replacement chemical in manufacturing. | 0.006 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFDA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFDoA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFEESA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFHpA PFHpAPFAS A medium-chain PFAS compound found in various environmental samples. Less studied than PFOA/PFOS but still considered a contaminant of concern. Health EffectsLiver effects, potential developmental toxicity, and endocrine disruption. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesDegradation of longer-chain PFAS, industrial discharge, and contaminated water sources. | 0.004 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFHpS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFHxA PFHxAPFAS A short-chain PFAS replacement chemical widely used after manufacturers phased out longer-chain PFAS. Very commonly detected in water. Health EffectsLiver and kidney effects, potential thyroid disruption. Considered less toxic than long-chain PFAS but still persistent. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesIndustrial processes, firefighting foam (AFFF), food packaging, and textile treatment. | 0.013 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFHxS PFHxSPFAS A medium-chain PFAS found in firefighting foam and consumer products. It has a long half-life in the human body, similar to long-chain PFAS. Health EffectsImmune system effects, thyroid disruption, and potential reproductive and developmental harm. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), waterproof textiles, food packaging, and industrial discharge. | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFMBA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFMPA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFNA PFNAPFAS A long-chain PFAS compound used in manufacturing fluoropolymers. It bioaccumulates in the body and is very persistent in the environment. Health EffectsDevelopmental effects, liver toxicity, immune suppression, and potential cancer risk. EPA LimitPart of Hazard Index (1.0) Common SourcesFluoropolymer manufacturing, industrial emissions, and contaminated water sources. | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFOA PFOAPFAS A long-chain PFAS ("forever chemical") once widely used in nonstick coatings and firefighting foam. It persists in the body and environment for years. Health EffectsLinked to kidney and testicular cancer, thyroid disease, elevated cholesterol, and reproductive issues. EPA Limit4.0 ppt MCL Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam (AFFF), nonstick cookware manufacturing, and contaminated groundwater. | 0.004 | 0.004 | µg/L | PFAS | Over MCL |
| PFOS PFOSPFAS A long-chain PFAS compound historically used in stain-resistant coatings and firefighting foam. One of the most studied and persistent PFAS chemicals. Health EffectsLiver damage, immune system suppression, thyroid disruption, increased cholesterol, and potential cancer risk. EPA Limit4.0 ppt MCL Common SourcesFirefighting foam (AFFF), industrial sites, stain-resistant fabric treatments, and contaminated groundwater. | ND | 0.004 | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFPeA PFPeAPFAS A short-chain PFAS compound commonly detected in drinking water. One of the most frequently found PFAS in UCMR 5 monitoring. Health EffectsLess studied than PFOA/PFOS. Potential liver and thyroid effects. Research is ongoing. EPA LimitNo individual MCL (not yet regulated) Common SourcesIndustrial discharge, firefighting foam degradation, and consumer products. | 0.358 | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Detected |
| PFPeS | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFTA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFTrDA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
| PFUnA | ND | HI | µg/L | PFAS | Not Detected |
Lead level trend (90th percentile)
See how Sugar Land compares by contaminant
Explore where Sugar Land ranks among all Texas cities for specific contaminants.
Water source & infrastructure
Where Sugar Land's water comes from
Sugar Land's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.
Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.
These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.
The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 176,205 people through 30 water systems.
Water bodies near Sugar Land
Sugar Land is located near 5 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.
Water systems serving Sugar Land
| System Name | PWSID | Population | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CITY OF SUGAR LAND | TX0790005 | 90,909 | SW |
| CITY OF SUGAR LAND - NEW TERRITORY | TX0790253 | 15,546 | GW |
| HARRIS COUNTY MUD 168 | TX1011783 | 13,029 | GW |
| CITY OF SUGAR LAND - GREATWOOD | TX0790296 | 12,368 | GW |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 128 | TX0790498 | 10,974 | SWP |
| MEMORIAL MUD | TX1011242 | 6,615 | GW |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 129 | TX0790437 | 4,713 | GWP |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 149 | TX0790517 | 4,638 | SWP |
| CITY OF SUGAR LAND RIVER PARK | TX0790354 | 4,278 | GW |
| KINGDOM HEIGHTS WATER SYSTEM | TX0790462 | 2,934 | GW |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 140 RIVERS EDGE | TX0790445 | 2,547 | GWP |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 191 | TX1700933 | 2,244 | GWP |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 115 RIVERSTONE | TX0790403 | 1,527 | GW |
| ROYAL LAKES ESTATES | TX0790364 | 1,002 | GW |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 100 | TX1700927 | 651 | GWP |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 140 | TX1700946 | 462 | GWP |
| FORT BEND COUNTY MUD 253 | TX0790639 | 420 | GW |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 162 | TX1700995 | 333 | GWP |
| SIENNA MANAGEMENT DISTRICT | TX0790495 | 300 | GW |
| WOODLOCH MHP | TX1010805 | 264 | GW |
| AUTUMN SHADOWS MOBILE HOME PARK | TX0200435 | 150 | GW |
| RICHMOND COMMUNITY ESTATES | TX0790576 | 90 | GW |
| MILLER MHP | TX1012166 | 66 | GW |
| MESQUITE MHP | TX1013245 | 60 | GW |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 159 | TX1700957 | 45 | GW |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 170 | TX1700950 | 25 | GW |
| THE LANDING II SUBDIVISION | TX1460200 | 15 | GW |
| PRADERA OAKS WATER SYSTEM | TX0200800 | — | GW |
| SIENNA REGIONAL MUD | TX0790373 | — | SWP |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY MUD 163 | TX1700943 | — | GW |
How Sugar Land compares
Full Texas rankings →Sugar Land's score of 37.2/100 is below the average of 46/100 among major Texas cities. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities.
Nearby cities
View Texas rankings →About Sugar Land, TX
Wikipedia →Sugar Land is the largest city in Fort Bend County, Texas, United States, located in the southwestern part of the Houston–The Woodlands–Sugar Land metropolitan area. Located about 19 miles (31 km) southwest of downtown Houston, Sugar Land is a populous suburban municipality centered around the junction of Texas State Highway 6 and Interstate 69/U.S. Route 59.
Learn more about your water
Guides and resources related to Sugar Land's water quality findings.
Explore water quality across Fort Bend
Frequently asked questions
Is Sugar Land, TX tap water safe to drink?
Sugar Land's water quality earned a grade of F (37.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #1038 out of 1067 cities tested in Texas.
What contaminants are in Sugar Land's water?
Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 9 PFAS compounds were detected. 224 violations are on record.
How is Sugar Land's water quality grade calculated?
The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.
Do I need a water filter in Sugar Land?
PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.
Where does Sugar Land's water come from?
Sugar Land's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 30 water systems serving approximately 176,205 residents.
What health violations has Sugar Land's water system had?
Sugar Land has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 86 violations remain unresolved.
Why does Sugar Land have so many PFAS compounds in its water?
9 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Sugar Land's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.
How does Sugar Land's water compare to other cities?
Sugar Land ranks #1038 out of 1067 cities in Texas (better than 3% of state cities) and #15417 out of 15744 cities nationally (2th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.