WaterVerge

Is Richland Springs, TX Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C, with 36 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

3K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: TX2060012
Overall Score
62 / 100
Violations
36 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#680 of 1067 in Texas Top 76% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
CGRADE
Water Quality Grade
62/100
waterverge.com
C 62/100

Richland Springs, TX — Water Quality Report

Richland Springs's drinking water received a grade of C (62 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 2,830 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply.

The system has 49 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 36 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Richland Springs's water

Richland Springs ranks #680 out of 1067 cities in Texas for water quality, placing it below average in the state.

Richland Springs relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

As a small community water system, Richland Springs may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

The system has seen 10 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
62 out of 100 Grade C
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
18.8/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
18.2/20
A
1 PFAS compound detected.
Compliance
0/10
F
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Richland Springs, TX water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Richland Springs's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C (62/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 2,830 residents using groundwater (wells).

36
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
1 compound
PFAS Detected
4 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Richland Springs

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Richland Springs's water quality assessment. Grade: C (62/100).

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4879). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Richland Springs's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

PFAS (1 compound) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 36.8000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Violation history

Richland Springs's water system has 49 total violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 36 remain unresolved. 10 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

OtherTTRPTMR
Most recent violations:
May 2025 Public Notice Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Jul 2024 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Dec 2023 Public Notice Open

Flood & environmental risk

San Saba County has experienced 4 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies.

SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4879
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, TORNADOES, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4781
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4416

Where does Richland Springs's water come from?

Richland Springs's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 2,830 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate.

What Richland Springs residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Richland Springs's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Richland Springs's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
36.8000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
36.8 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 61% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
1
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

49
Total violations
5
Health-based
36
Active / unresolved
May 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

49 Total
36 Active
5 Health-based
13 Resolved
Violations by category
Lead and Copper Rule
23
Consumer Confidence Rule
8
Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule
7
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
7
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
2
May 2025 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2024 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2023 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Dec 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2023 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2022 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2022 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2021 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2020 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2018 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Apr 2018 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2017 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Nov 2017 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Sep 2017 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2017 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jun 2017 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jun 2017 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Showing 20 of 49 violations
Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

4
Declared disasters
Jul 2025
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

San Saba County has experienced 4 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Jul 2025
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4879
May 2024
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, TORNADOES, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4781
Feb 2019
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4416
Sep 2005
HURRICANE RITA
Hurricane FEMA #1606

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Richland Springs's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
1 PFAS compound detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 36.800 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 2.2 ppb from 1994 (2.2 ppb) to 2024 (0.0 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how Richland Springs compares by contaminant

Explore where Richland Springs ranks among all Texas cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
2,830
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Richland Springs's water comes from

Groundwater

Richland Springs's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 2,830 people through 2 water systems.

Infrastructure

Water systems serving Richland Springs

System Name PWSID Population Source
RICHLAND SUD TX2060012 2,505 GW
CITY OF RICHLAND SPRINGS TX2060002 325 GW
Regional Comparison

How Richland Springs compares

Full Texas rankings →

Richland Springs's score of 62/100 is above the average of 46/100 among major Texas cities. It outscores 8 of 10 nearby cities.

Richland Springs (this city)
62
Houston
27.8
Austin
31.2
Dallas
36.2
Fort Worth
34.5
Texas avg
46
City Profile

About Richland Springs, TX

Economic Profile
$23,563
Median Income
$82,187
Median Home Value
0%
Unemployment
Community
18.9
Median Age
95
People / sq mi
20.9%
College Educated
84.1%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Richland Springs, TX tap water safe to drink?

Richland Springs's water quality earned a grade of C (62/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #680 out of 1067 cities tested in Texas.

What contaminants are in Richland Springs's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 49 violations are on record.

How is Richland Springs's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Richland Springs?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Richland Springs's water come from?

Richland Springs's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 2,830 residents.

What health violations has Richland Springs's water system had?

Richland Springs has 5 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in May 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 36 violations remain unresolved.

Is Richland Springs's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Richland Springs uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 49 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Richland Springs's water compare to other cities?

Richland Springs ranks #680 out of 1067 cities in Texas (better than 36% of state cities) and #11931 out of 15744 cities nationally (24th percentile). The grade of C reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.