WaterVerge

Is Gilmer, TX Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

24K residents served 4 water systems PWSID: TX2300012
Overall Score
61.9 / 100
Violations
27 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#682 of 1067 in Texas Top 76% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
CGRADE
Water Quality Grade
61.9/100
waterverge.com
C 61.9/100

Gilmer, TX — Water Quality Report

Gilmer's drinking water received a grade of C (61.9 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 23,970 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply.

The system has 58 violations on record, including 7 health-based violations. 27 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Gilmer's water

Gilmer ranks #682 out of 1067 cities in Texas for water quality, placing it below average in the state.

Gilmer relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.03 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

The system has seen 11 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
61.9 out of 100 Grade C
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
19.6/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
18.2/20
A
1 PFAS compound detected.
Compliance
3/10
F
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Gilmer, TX water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Gilmer's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C (61.9/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 23,970 residents using groundwater (wells).

27
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
1 compound
PFAS Detected
5 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Gilmer

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detected

Detected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Gilmer's water quality assessment. Grade: C (61.9/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Violation
4 drinking water violations recorded

2 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Disaster
HURRICANE BERYL

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4798). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Gilmer's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 1.39 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

PFAS (1 compound) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 16.5000 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Detected but within current EPA limits. PFAS do not break down in the environment and can accumulate in the body over time. An activated carbon filter can reduce exposure.

Violation history

Gilmer's water system has 58 total violations on record, including 7 health-based violations. 27 remain unresolved. 11 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

OtherRPTTTMRMCL
Most recent violations:
Jul 2025 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
May 2025 Public Notice Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open

Flood & environmental risk

Upshur County has experienced 5 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Big Sandy Ck Nr Big Sandy.

HURRICANE BERYL
Hurricane FEMA DR-4798
TROPICAL STORMS MARCO AND LAURA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3540
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4269

Where does Gilmer's water come from?

Gilmer's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 4 water systems serving approximately 23,970 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Big Sandy Ck Nr Big Sandy (river).

What Gilmer residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Gilmer's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Gilmer's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
1.39 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +7% over limit
Exceeds Limit
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
16.5000 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.03 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 0% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
123.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 8% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Detected
29.5 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · 14% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
16.5 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 28% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
1
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

58
Total violations
7
Health-based
27
Active / unresolved
Jul 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

58 Total
27 Active
7 Health-based
31 Resolved
Violations by category
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
16
Lead and Copper Rule
10
Total Coliform Rule
9
Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule
6
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
4
Jul 2025 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
May 2025 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2022 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Mar 2022 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Mar 2022 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Dec 2021 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jan 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2020 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2018 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jan 2018 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2017 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jan 2017 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2016 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2015 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2014 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2013 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Showing 20 of 58 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Gilmer

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Gilmer, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 22 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
ROBROY INDUSTRIES-TEXAS LLC
Electrical Equipment · ROBROY INDUSTRIES
GILMER, TX75644
Zinc compounds171.3 mi
HIXSON LUMBER CO LLC
Wood Products · HIXSON LUMBER CO LLC
GILMER, TX75644
Copper compounds51.2 mi
DUOLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Machinery · MAXTUBE LIMITED
GILMER, TX75645
3.6 mi
ROSEWOOD DEW POINT
Natural Gas Processing · ENERGY TRANSFER LP
GILMER, TX75644
7.8 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D3 — extreme drought

Upshur County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
15.4%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

5
Declared disasters
Jul 2024
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Upshur County has experienced 5 federally declared disasters since 2005. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Jul 2024
HURRICANE BERYL
Hurricane FEMA #4798
Aug 2020
TROPICAL STORMS MARCO AND LAURA
Hurricane FEMA #3540
Apr 2016
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4269
Sep 2008
HURRICANE IKE
Hurricane FEMA #1791
Sep 2005
HURRICANE RITA
Hurricane FEMA #1606

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Gilmer's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
1 PFAS compound detected
🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.39 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 16.500 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 2.3 ppb from 1993 (2.3 ppb) to 2025 (0.0 ppb).

Copper level (90th percentile)

Latest reading: 1.390 mg/L (1995)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
23,970
Water Systems
4
Water Source

Where Gilmer's water comes from

Groundwater

Gilmer's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 23,970 people through 4 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Gilmer

Gilmer is located near 1 notable water body. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Big Sandy Ck Nr Big Sandy
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Gilmer

System Name PWSID Population Source
PRITCHETT WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION TX2300012 10,089 GW
CITY OF GILMER TX2300002 7,812 GW
GLENWOOD WSC TX2300005 3,738 GW
CITY OF EAST MOUNTAIN TX2300033 2,331 GW
Regional Comparison

How Gilmer compares

Full Texas rankings →

Gilmer's score of 61.9/100 is above the average of 46/100 among major Texas cities. It outscores 8 of 10 nearby cities.

Gilmer (this city)
61.9
Houston
27.8
Austin
31.2
Dallas
36.2
Fort Worth
34.5
Texas avg
46
City Profile

About Gilmer, TX

Economic Profile
$43,894
Median Income
$158,201
Median Home Value
$848/mo
Median Rent
8.7%
Unemployment
Community
35.9
Median Age
498
People / sq mi
18.9%
College Educated
55.8%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Gilmer, TX tap water safe to drink?

Gilmer's water quality earned a grade of C (61.9/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #682 out of 1067 cities tested in Texas.

What contaminants are in Gilmer's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 58 violations are on record.

How is Gilmer's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Gilmer?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Gilmer's water come from?

Gilmer's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 4 water systems serving approximately 23,970 residents.

What health violations has Gilmer's water system had?

Gilmer has 7 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 27 violations remain unresolved.

Is Gilmer's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Gilmer uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 58 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Gilmer's water compare to other cities?

Gilmer ranks #682 out of 1067 cities in Texas (better than 36% of state cities) and #11938 out of 15744 cities nationally (24th percentile). The grade of C reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.