WaterVerge

Is Cut Bank, MT Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D, with 32 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

4K residents served 9 water systems PWSID: MT0000193
Overall Score
49 / 100
Violations
32 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Surface water
#84 of 115 in Montana Top 85% nationally
Local Government
Moderate data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
DGRADE
Water Quality Grade
49/100
waterverge.com
D 49/100

Cut Bank, MT — Water Quality Report

Cut Bank's drinking water received a grade of D (49 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 9 water systems serve approximately 3,803 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program.

The system has 453 violations on record, including 29 health-based violations. 32 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Cut Bank's water

Cut Bank ranks #84 out of 115 cities in Montana for water quality, placing it below average in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

The system has seen 17 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
49 out of 100 Grade D
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
17/20
B
PFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Surface water.
Water Safety

Is Cut Bank, MT water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Cut Bank's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (49/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 9 water systems serve approximately 3,803 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

32
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
4 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Cut Bank

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Cut Bank's water quality assessment. Grade: D (49/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.

Disaster
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3253). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HEAVY RAINS, LANDSLIDES & FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-761). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Cut Bank's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Violation history

Cut Bank's water system has 453 total violations on record, including 29 health-based violations. 32 remain unresolved. 17 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

OtherMRMONMCLTT
Most recent violations:
Oct 2025 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Jan 2025 TTHM Resolved
Jan 2025 Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Resolved
Dec 2024 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Oct 2024 Consumer Confidence Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Glacier County has experienced 4 federally declared disasters since 1974. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Cut Bank Creek At Cut Bank.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA DR-3253
HEAVY RAINS, LANDSLIDES & FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-761
RAINS, SHOWMELT, STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-472

Where does Cut Bank's water come from?

Cut Bank's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 9 water systems serving approximately 3,803 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Cut Bank Creek At Cut Bank (river).

What Cut Bank residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Cut Bank's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Cut Bank's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
Compliance Record

Violation summary

453
Total violations
29
Health-based
32
Active / unresolved
Oct 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

453 Total
32 Active
29 Health-based
421 Resolved
1 SNC
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
167
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
79
Inorganic Chemicals
50
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
31
Total Coliform Rule
24
Oct 2025 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2024 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2022 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Dec 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2019 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2019 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2017 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Dec 2015 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2015 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jan 2014 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jan 2014 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2013 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2012 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2011 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2011 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Showing 20 of 453 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D3 — extreme drought

Glacier County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
37.7%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

4
Declared disasters
Sep 2005
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Glacier County has experienced 4 federally declared disasters since 1974. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3253
Mar 1986
HEAVY RAINS, LANDSLIDES & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #761
Jun 1975
RAINS, SHOWMELT, STORMS & FLOODING
Flood FEMA #472
Jan 1974
SEVERE STORMS, FLOODING & LANDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #417

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 1.0 ppb from 1993 (2.0 ppb) to 2026 (3.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
3,803
Water Systems
9
Source breakdown
Groundwater
5
Surface Water
2
Purchased Groundwater
2
Water Source

Where Cut Bank's water comes from

Surface Water

Cut Bank's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,803 people through 9 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Cut Bank

Cut Bank is located near 1 notable water body. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Cut Bank Creek At Cut Bank
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Cut Bank

System Name PWSID Population Source
CUT BANK CITY OF MT0000193 3,105 SW
GLENDALE COLONY MT0001648 150 GW
SEVILLE COLONY MT0002974 116 SW
BIG SKY COLONY CUT BANK MT0001647 107 GW
GLACIER COLONY MT0000566 80 GW
HIDDEN LAKE COLONY MT0003932 80 GW
ZENITH COLONY MT0004768 70 GW
NCMRWA SHELBY TO ETHRIDGE MT0004936 70 GWP
NCMRWA ETHERIDGE TO CUTBANK MT0004993 25 GWP
Regional Comparison

How Cut Bank compares

Full Montana rankings →

Cut Bank's score of 49/100 is on par with the average of 45/100 among major Montana cities. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities.

Cut Bank (this city)
49
Billings
39.6
Missoula
42.6
Bozeman
43.4
Helena
39.1
Montana avg
45
City Profile

About Cut Bank, MT

Wikipedia →

Cut Bank is a city in and the county seat of Glacier County, Montana, United States, located just east of the "cut bank" (gorge) along Cut Bank Creek. The population was 3,056 at the 2020 census. The town was founded in 1891 with the arrival of the Great Northern Railway.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Cut Bank, MT tap water safe to drink?

Cut Bank's water quality earned a grade of D (49/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #84 out of 115 cities tested in Montana.

What contaminants are in Cut Bank's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 453 violations are on record.

How is Cut Bank's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Cut Bank?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Cut Bank's water come from?

Cut Bank's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 9 water systems serving approximately 3,803 residents.

What health violations has Cut Bank's water system had?

Cut Bank has 29 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 32 violations remain unresolved.

How does Cut Bank's water compare to other cities?

Cut Bank ranks #84 out of 115 cities in Montana (better than 27% of state cities) and #13318 out of 15744 cities nationally (15th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.