Strontium in Wisconsin Drinking Water
Ranked by max strontium detected (µg/L) · UCMR 3 data (2013–2015) · Data from EPA SDWIS & UCMR
Strontium in Wisconsin: what the data shows
Wisconsin has 85 cities with strontium data from the EPA's UCMR 3 program (2013–2015). Strontium was detected above the 1,500 µg/L EPA health reference level in 16 of those cities. The state average max detected level is 3399.5 µg/L. Strontium occurs naturally in groundwater, particularly in areas with limestone and dolomite geology. It can also enter water from industrial waste and mining operations. There is no federal MCL for strontium, but the EPA established a health reference level (HRL) of 1,500 µg/L. Long-term exposure to strontium above the HRL may affect bone health, particularly in children, by substituting for calcium in developing bones. Reverse osmosis and ion exchange systems are effective at removing strontium from drinking water.
Cities exceeding 1,500 µg/L EPA HRL (no MCL)
Strontium data across Wisconsin
Each dot is a city with UCMR 3 strontium testing data. Cities where strontium exceeds the 1,500 µg/L EPA health reference level are highlighted. Size reflects population served.
Top 10 cities by strontium level in Wisconsin
Highest Strontium levels (µg/L)
All Wisconsin cities ranked by strontium level
| # | City | Level | Level | Over HRL? | Violations | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Germantown | 52614.2 µg/L | Over HRL | 8 | B- | |
| 2 | Brookfield | 40501.0 µg/L | Over HRL | 32 | C- | |
| 3 | Waukesha | 38976.5 µg/L | Over HRL | 320 | D | |
| 4 | Little Chute | 27000.0 µg/L | Over HRL | 1 | B+ | |
| 5 | Kaukauna | 26872.8 µg/L | Over HRL | 9 | B+ | |
| 6 | Menomonee Falls | 22000.0 µg/L | Over HRL | 6 | B+ | |
| 7 | Wrightstown | 21029.8 µg/L | Over HRL | 4 | B | |
| 8 | Fond Du Lac | 11671.6 µg/L | Over HRL | 51 | F | |
| 9 | Appleton | 10950.3 µg/L | Over HRL | 4 | B+ | |
| 10 | Green Bay | 9825.1 µg/L | Over HRL | 74 | D+ | |
| 11 | Grafton | 4009.3 µg/L | Over HRL | 12 | C+ | |
| 12 | De Pere | 3847.4 µg/L | Over HRL | 38 | B | |
| 13 | Kiel | 2500.0 µg/L | Over HRL | 3 | A- | |
| 14 | Cedarburg | 2360.2 µg/L | Over HRL | 1 | B+ | |
| 15 | West Bend | 2307.7 µg/L | Over HRL | 11 | F | |
| 16 | Omro | 1690.0 µg/L | Over HRL | 1 | A- | |
| 17 | Watertown | 772.2 µg/L | No | 10 | D | |
| 18 | Beaver Dam | 730.0 µg/L | No | 11 | A- | |
| 19 | Oconomowoc | 696.4 µg/L | No | 13 | B | |
| 20 | Manitowoc | 580.0 µg/L | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 21 | Algoma | 393.6 µg/L | No | 2 | A- | |
| 22 | Whitewater | 334.5 µg/L | No | 22 | C+ | |
| 23 | Hudson | 322.1 µg/L | No | 4 | B | |
| 24 | Manawa | 320.7 µg/L | No | 2 | B | |
| 25 | Weston | 259.8 µg/L | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 26 | Fort Atkinson | 223.7 µg/L | No | 14 | A- | |
| 27 | Portage | 181.9 µg/L | No | 9 | B | |
| 28 | Hartford | 181.0 µg/L | No | 2 | B+ | |
| 29 | La Crosse | 170.0 µg/L | No | 34 | F | |
| 30 | Rhinelander | 160.0 µg/L | No | 5 | B | |
| 31 | Racine | 153.8 µg/L | No | 4 | C+ | |
| 32 | Caledonia | 149.3 µg/L | No | 1 | B | |
| 33 | Oak Creek | 149.0 µg/L | No | 5 | B | |
| 34 | Franklin | 145.7 µg/L | No | 10 | B | |
| 35 | Marshfield | 143.6 µg/L | No | 9 | C- | |
| 36 | Cudahy | 142.6 µg/L | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 37 | South Milwaukee | 139.2 µg/L | No | 0 | A- | |
| 38 | Kenosha | 136.8 µg/L | No | 11 | D | |
| 39 | Two Rivers | 136.2 µg/L | No | 5 | C- | |
| 40 | Milwaukee | 130.0 µg/L | No | 2 | A | |
| 41 | Sheboygan | 130.0 µg/L | No | 1 | A- | |
| 42 | Port Washington | 130.0 µg/L | No | 6 | B+ | |
| 43 | Whitefish Bay | 128.0 µg/L | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 44 | Hartland | 127.2 µg/L | No | 8 | B | |
| 45 | Glendale | 127.0 µg/L | No | 1 | A- | |
| 46 | West Allis | 125.8 µg/L | No | 0 | A- | |
| 47 | Sheboygan Falls | 124.0 µg/L | No | 5 | B- | |
| 48 | New Berlin | 123.6 µg/L | No | 14 | B | |
| 49 | Janesville | 123.6 µg/L | No | 12 | B | |
| 50 | Marinette | 123.4 µg/L | No | 0 | A- | |
| 51 | Brown Deer | 123.3 µg/L | No | 5 | A | |
| 52 | Beloit | 123.1 µg/L | No | 2 | B+ | |
| 53 | Greendale | 120.9 µg/L | No | 1 | A- | |
| 54 | Shorewood | 120.0 µg/L | No | 1 | A- | |
| 55 | Onalaska | 117.5 µg/L | No | 2 | A- | |
| 56 | Wauwatosa | 115.9 µg/L | No | 1 | B+ | |
| 57 | Rice Lake | 111.2 µg/L | No | 17 | F | |
| 58 | Arlington | 100.9 µg/L | No | 7 | B | |
| 59 | Madison | 100.0 µg/L | No | 14 | F | |
| 60 | Lac Du Flambeau | 100.0 µg/L | No | 1 | A | |
| 61 | Stoughton | 88.8 µg/L | No | 4 | B+ | |
| 62 | Sun Prairie | 87.2 µg/L | No | 4 | A | |
| 63 | Oshkosh | 85.0 µg/L | No | 0 | A | |
| 64 | Menasha | 84.5 µg/L | No | 1 | B+ | |
| 65 | Chippewa Falls | 84.4 µg/L | No | 12 | D+ | |
| 66 | Fitchburg | 82.8 µg/L | No | 0 | A | |
| 67 | Monroe | 79.3 µg/L | No | 9 | A- | |
| 68 | Middleton | 79.3 µg/L | No | 3 | C+ | |
| 69 | Wausau | 79.3 µg/L | No | 24 | C | |
| 70 | Stevens Point | 77.8 µg/L | No | 14 | C+ | |
| 71 | Waunakee | 74.7 µg/L | No | 11 | B- | |
| 72 | Baraboo | 70.6 µg/L | No | 0 | B | |
| 73 | Menomonie | 70.6 µg/L | No | 30 | F | |
| 74 | Edgar | 70.2 µg/L | No | 1 | B+ | |
| 75 | Grand Chute | 67.9 µg/L | No | 2 | A | |
| 76 | Wisconsin Rapids | 66.6 µg/L | No | 6 | B- | |
| 77 | Shawano | 63.4 µg/L | No | 11 | A | |
| 78 | Neenah | 54.1 µg/L | No | 6 | C+ | |
| 79 | Plover | 53.0 µg/L | No | 9 | B+ | |
| 80 | Eau Claire | 51.8 µg/L | No | 18 | D+ | |
| 81 | Hayward | 51.0 µg/L | No | 19 | F | |
| 82 | River Falls | 41.2 µg/L | No | 14 | C+ | |
| 83 | Bowler | 36.5 µg/L | No | 8 | A- | |
| 84 | Superior | 30.3 µg/L | No | 17 | F | |
| 85 | Fort Mccoy | 20.4 µg/L | No | 4 | B+ |
Frequently asked questions about strontium in Wisconsin
Is strontium in Wisconsin tap water harmful?
Strontium at low levels is not considered harmful, but the EPA set a health reference level (HRL) of 1,500 µg/L based on potential bone effects. 16 cities in Wisconsin exceed this HRL. There is currently no federal MCL for strontium. Children may be more susceptible because strontium can substitute for calcium in developing bones.
How can I remove strontium from my drinking water?
Reverse osmosis and ion exchange (water softener) systems are effective at removing strontium from drinking water. Standard carbon filters are NOT effective. If your water comes from a well in an area with limestone or dolomite geology, consider testing for strontium.