Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Cambridge, WI Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B, with 16 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
2.4 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
16 unresolved violations
2K people served by 6 water systems

PWSID WI1130074 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 76.3 / 100

#310 of 441Wisconsin cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Cambridge water safe?

Cambridge's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B (76.3/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 6 water systems serve approximately 1,638 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

16 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 2.4 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

5 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Cambridge's drinking water received a grade of B (76.3 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 6 water systems serve approximately 1,638 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.4 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 74 violations on record, including 8 health-based violations. 16 remain unresolved.

Cambridge ranks #310 out of 441 cities in Wisconsin for water quality, placing it below average in the state. Cambridge relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. As a small community water system, Cambridge may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 76.3/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
29.3 / 45C
Lead & CopperLead at 2.4 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Cambridge's water

Every contaminant flagged in Cambridge, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
1 contaminant tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.4 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Cambridge's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 74 violations on record, including 8 health-based violations. 16 remain unresolved.

5 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 10 monitoring & paperwork 10 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Cambridge's water quality assessment. Grade: B (76.3/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation4 drinking water violations recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS, Public Notice.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, AND LANDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4402). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATIONFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3249). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 7.6 ppb1994 — 5.4 ppb1995 — 4.2 ppb1996 — 3.5 ppb1997 — 2.6 ppb1999 — 4.2 ppb2000 — 3 ppb2002 — 4.6 ppb2003 — 0 ppb2005 — 3.4 ppb2006 — 10 ppb2007 — 2.3 ppb2008 — 0.86 ppb2009 — 0 ppb2011 — 1.9 ppb2012 — 0.99 ppb2014 — 1.6 ppb2015 — 1.4 ppb2017 — 8.2 ppb2018 — 0.79 ppb2020 — 1.5 ppb2021 — 0.60 ppb2022 — 1.5 ppb2023 — 1.2 ppb2024 — 4.0 ppb7.64.0199319992006201220202024

Down 3.5 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 4.0 ppb (2024) — 27% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Cambridge's water comes from

Cambridge's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

6 systems

6 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

1,638 people

Residents served across Cambridge's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 1,638 people through 6 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
CAMBRIDGE WATER & SEWER UTILITY WI1130074 1,638 Groundwater
BREEZY KNOLL COMMUNITY WI1280120 116 Groundwater
RIPVIEW COURT 1 WI1280121 35 Groundwater
RIPVIEW COURT 4 WI1280125 35 Groundwater
RIPVIEW COURT 3 WI1280123 31 Groundwater
RIPVIEW COURT 2 WI1280122 31 Groundwater

Water bodies near Cambridge

Lake Koshkonong · lake

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Cambridge's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

3 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

MPI ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES LLC 0 lb · 4.0 mi
MPI - WIS FINEBLANKING DIV 0 lb · 4.4 mi
FIBERDOME PRODUCTS LLC PLANT 2 0 lb · 8.2 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

3 federal disaster declarations on record for Dane County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, AND LANDSLIDES Oct 2018 · DR-4402
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3249
SEVERE STORMS, ICING, WIND & FLOODING Mar 1976 · DR-496

Drought

D1 — moderate drought

Dane County is in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Months in D2+ over the last 30 years11.3%

06How Cambridge compares

Scores for nearby Wisconsin cities on one line, with the average marked.

Milwaukee
90.2 · A
Cambridge (this city)
76.3 · B
Racine
69.5 · C+
Green Bay
54 · D+
Kenosha
45.8 · D
Madison
35.4 · F

dashed line = Wisconsin average (65/100)

Cambridge scores 76.3/100above the Wisconsin average of 65/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Wisconsin rankings →

Dane water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Cambridge's water — not generic advice.

Extra protection

A basic carbon filter still helps

Cambridge's water meets federal standards, but a simple carbon filter improves taste and adds a margin of safety against short-term issues.

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Cambridge alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Cambridge, WI tap water safe to drink?

Cambridge's water quality earned a grade of B (76.3/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #310 out of 441 cities tested in Wisconsin.

What contaminants are in Cambridge's water?

Lead was measured at 2.4 ppb (90th percentile). 74 violations are on record.

How is Cambridge's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Cambridge?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Cambridge's water come from?

Cambridge's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 6 water systems serving approximately 1,638 residents.

What health violations has Cambridge's water system had?

Cambridge has 8 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in November 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 16 violations remain unresolved.

Is Cambridge's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Cambridge uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 74 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Cambridge's water compare to other cities?

Cambridge ranks #310 out of 441 cities in Wisconsin (better than 30% of state cities) and #9232 out of 15382 cities nationally (40th percentile). The grade of B reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Cambridge, WI: Cambridge is a village in Dane and Jefferson counties in the U.S. state of Wisconsin. The population was 1,638 at the 2020 census, of which 1,539 were in Dane County and 99 were in Jefferson County. The Dane County portion is part of the Madison Metropolitan Area and the Jefferson County portion a part of the Watertown–Fort Atkinson micropolitan statistical area, which itself is part of the larger Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha Combined Statistical Area. Median household income $90,385 · median home value $253,253 · median age 44.2 · 75.9% homeowners · 38.7% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Dane.
Show ZIP codes 53523
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.