Lead in Connecticut Drinking Water
Ranked by 90th percentile lead level (ppb) · Data from EPA SDWIS & UCMR
Lead in Connecticut: what the data shows
Connecticut has 158 cities with lead monitoring data, with very few cities exceeding the EPA action level of 15 ppb. The state average 90th percentile lead level is 1.5 ppb, compared to 3.3 ppb nationally — better than the national average. 3 cities exceed the 15 ppb action level. High lead levels in tap water typically indicate aging infrastructure — lead service lines, lead solder in older plumbing, or lead-containing brass fixtures. There is no safe level of lead exposure for children. The 90th percentile measurement means that 90% of tap samples in a city are at or below the reported level. This is the standard EPA uses under the Lead and Copper Rule to determine if a water system needs to take corrective action. An NSF 53-certified pitcher or under-sink filter can effectively remove lead at the tap.
Cities exceeding 15 ppb EPA Action Level
Lead data across Connecticut
Each dot is a city, colored by overall water quality grade. Cities with lead levels above the 15 ppb EPA action level are highlighted. Size reflects population served.
Top 10 cities by lead level in Connecticut
All Connecticut cities ranked by lead level
| # | City | Level | Level | Exceeds? | Violations | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carroll | 48.0 ppb | Yes | 10 | C | |
| 2 | Carroll | 48.0 ppb | Yes | 9 | C | |
| 3 | Bow | 44.0 ppb | Yes | 53 | D | |
| 4 | Coventry | 8.5 ppb | No | 34 | F | |
| 5 | Lower Sipaulovi, Lower Mishongnovi | 5.0 ppb | No | 63 | D | |
| 6 | Lower Sipaulovi, Lower Mishongnovi | 5.0 ppb | No | 63 | D | |
| 7 | Windham | 4.3 ppb | No | 11 | B+ | |
| 8 | Hopkinton | 4.0 ppb | No | 37 | F | |
| 9 | Lewisboro (T) | 4.0 ppb | No | 3 | B+ | |
| 10 | Washington | 3.7 ppb | No | 31 | F | |
| 11 | Groton | 3.0 ppb | No | 6 | B- | |
| 12 | Beacon Falls | 2.8 ppb | No | 27 | F | |
| 13 | Clinton | 2.8 ppb | No | 20 | D | |
| 14 | Putnam | 2.8 ppb | No | 72 | F | |
| 15 | Putnam | 2.8 ppb | No | 120 | F | |
| 16 | Putnam | 2.8 ppb | No | 19 | D | |
| 17 | Brookfield | 2.8 ppb | No | 56 | D+ | |
| 18 | Plymouth | 2.8 ppb | No | 0 | A+ | |
| 19 | Killingworth | 2.7 ppb | No | 35 | C- | |
| 20 | Uncasville | 2.6 ppb | No | 1 | A | |
| 21 | Franklin | 2.5 ppb | No | 143 | F | |
| 22 | Bethel | 2.4 ppb | No | 59 | F | |
| 23 | Bethel | 2.4 ppb | No | 25 | F | |
| 24 | Berlin | 2.2 ppb | No | 6 | F | |
| 25 | Berlin | 2.2 ppb | No | 1 | D | |
| 26 | Middlebury | 2.2 ppb | No | 11 | D+ | |
| 27 | Berlin | 2.2 ppb | No | 0 | B- | |
| 28 | Marlborough | 2.2 ppb | No | 19 | D | |
| 29 | Middlebury | 2.0 ppb | No | 18 | C- | |
| 30 | Brookfield | 2.0 ppb | No | 85 | F | |
| 31 | Plainfield | 2.0 ppb | No | 37 | D | |
| 32 | Middlebury | 1.8 ppb | No | 15 | F | |
| 33 | East Haddam | 1.8 ppb | No | 26 | D | |
| 34 | Kent | 1.6 ppb | No | 30 | D | |
| 35 | Ashford | 1.6 ppb | No | 32 | D | |
| 36 | Franklin | 1.5 ppb | No | 32 | F | |
| 37 | Cromwell | 1.4 ppb | No | 25 | F | |
| 38 | North Canaan | 1.3 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 39 | Hebron | 1.1 ppb | No | 21 | F | |
| 40 | Sheffield | 1.1 ppb | No | 7 | A- | |
| 41 | Sheffield | 1.1 ppb | No | 3 | A | |
| 42 | Mashantucket | 1.0 ppb | No | 7 | B | |
| 43 | Sharon | 0.8 ppb | No | 9 | F | |
| 44 | Willington | 0.6 ppb | No | 41 | F | |
| 45 | Killingly | 0.5 ppb | No | 32 | F | |
| 46 | Killingly | 0.5 ppb | No | 14 | C- | |
| 47 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | D | |
| 48 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 12 | F | |
| 49 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 18 | F | |
| 50 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | F | |
| 51 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | C+ | |
| 52 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 5 | C | |
| 53 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 8 | C | |
| 54 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | F | |
| 55 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 5 | F | |
| 56 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 28 | F | |
| 57 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | D | |
| 58 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | D+ | |
| 59 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 40 | F | |
| 60 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B- | |
| 61 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | C+ | |
| 62 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 63 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | D | |
| 64 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | C- | |
| 65 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | D | |
| 66 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | B- | |
| 67 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | B+ | |
| 68 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | D | |
| 69 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | D+ | |
| 70 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 71 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 72 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 73 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 74 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 25 | F | |
| 75 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 76 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 77 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 78 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 79 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 80 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 81 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 9 | C | |
| 82 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 83 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 33 | F | |
| 84 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | B | |
| 85 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | A- | |
| 86 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | A- | |
| 87 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | A- | |
| 88 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | A- | |
| 89 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | C- | |
| 90 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 46 | F | |
| 91 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | F | |
| 92 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | F | |
| 93 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | F | |
| 94 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | F | |
| 95 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 96 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 97 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 98 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 99 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 2 | C- | |
| 100 | Berlin | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | C | |
| 101 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 5 | C- | |
| 102 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 85 | F | |
| 103 | Middlebury | 0.0 ppb | No | 14 | C | |
| 104 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 9 | D | |
| 105 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 25 | F | |
| 106 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 24 | F | |
| 107 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 12 | C- | |
| 108 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | C+ | |
| 109 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B | |
| 110 | Bristol | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | C+ | |
| 111 | Bethel | 0.0 ppb | No | 135 | F | |
| 112 | Bristol | 0.0 ppb | No | 18 | C | |
| 113 | Bristol | 0.0 ppb | No | 9 | C | |
| 114 | Cromwell | 0.0 ppb | No | 11 | D | |
| 115 | Groton | 0.0 ppb | No | 23 | D+ | |
| 116 | Groton | 0.0 ppb | No | 17 | F | |
| 117 | Harwinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 8 | F | |
| 118 | New London | 0.0 ppb | No | 16 | C- | |
| 119 | New London | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | C+ | |
| 120 | Franklin | 0.0 ppb | No | 27 | F | |
| 121 | Harwinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 19 | F | |
| 122 | Harwinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | B+ | |
| 123 | Harwinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 5 | D | |
| 124 | Franklin | 0.0 ppb | No | 19 | B- | |
| 125 | Franklin | 0.0 ppb | No | 23 | D+ | |
| 126 | Franklin | 0.0 ppb | No | 13 | B | |
| 127 | Franklin | 0.0 ppb | No | 13 | B | |
| 128 | Clinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 18 | C+ | |
| 129 | Hampton | 0.0 ppb | No | 12 | B- | |
| 130 | Clinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | D+ | |
| 131 | Hampton | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | B | |
| 132 | Clinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | C+ | |
| 133 | Clinton | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B- | |
| 134 | Plainville | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | C+ | |
| 135 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 9 | F | |
| 136 | Beacon Falls | 0.0 ppb | No | 1 | A | |
| 137 | East Windsor | 0.0 ppb | No | 6 | C+ | |
| 138 | Ansonia | 0.0 ppb | No | 6 | B- | |
| 139 | East Granby | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | C+ | |
| 140 | East Lyme | 0.0 ppb | No | 6 | C | |
| 141 | Griswold | 0.0 ppb | No | 53 | F | |
| 142 | Barkhamsted | 0.0 ppb | No | 12 | C | |
| 143 | Barkhamsted | 0.0 ppb | No | 7 | A- | |
| 144 | Avon | 0.0 ppb | No | 8 | C | |
| 145 | Colchester | 0.0 ppb | No | 34 | D | |
| 146 | Chester | 0.0 ppb | No | 10 | D | |
| 147 | Chester | 0.0 ppb | No | 12 | B- | |
| 148 | Chester | 0.0 ppb | No | 5 | C | |
| 149 | Old Lyme | 0.0 ppb | No | 42 | D | |
| 150 | Goshen | 0.0 ppb | No | 10 | C | |
| 151 | East Hampton | 0.0 ppb | No | 64 | D | |
| 152 | Woodbury | 0.0 ppb | No | 18 | D+ | |
| 153 | Durham | 0.0 ppb | No | 46 | D | |
| 154 | Salisbury | 0.0 ppb | No | 4 | B+ | |
| 155 | North Stonington | 0.0 ppb | No | 19 | C | |
| 156 | Sprague | 0.0 ppb | No | 0 | B+ | |
| 157 | Norfolk | 0.0 ppb | No | 3 | A- | |
| 158 | Pomfret | 0.0 ppb | No | 66 | D |
Frequently asked questions about lead in Connecticut
Is lead in Connecticut tap water a concern?
Yes — 3 of 158 cities with lead data exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. The state average is 1.5 ppb. Even below the action level, lead poses health risks especially for children and pregnant women. If your home was built before 1986, consider testing your tap water directly.
How can I reduce lead exposure from Connecticut tap water?
Use an NSF 53-certified water filter, which is specifically certified to reduce lead. Run your cold tap for 30 seconds before drinking or cooking, especially if water has been sitting in pipes for hours. Never use hot tap water for cooking or making baby formula, as heat increases lead leaching from pipes.
Which Connecticut cities have the highest lead levels?
The cities with the highest 90th percentile lead levels in Connecticut are: Carroll (48.0 ppb), Carroll (48.0 ppb), Bow (44.0 ppb), Coventry (8.5 ppb), Lower Sipaulovi, Lower Mishongnovi (5.0 ppb). See the full ranked table above.