WaterVerge
HAA5 Contamination

HAA5 in Connecticut Drinking Water

Ranked by average HAA5 concentration (µg/L) · UCMR 4 data (2018–2020) · Data from EPA SDWIS & UCMR

110
Cities Tested
0
Exceeds Limit
0%
% Exceeds Limit
27.3 µg/L
State Avg
▼ 1% vs national
vs National
134
Health Violations

HAA5 in Connecticut: what the data shows

Connecticut has 110 cities with HAA5 monitoring data from the EPA's UCMR 4 program (2018–2020). Haloacetic acids (HAA5) form when chlorine-based disinfectants react with natural organic matter in water. The state average is 27.3 µg/L — better than the 15.5 µg/L national average. No cities currently exceed the 60 µg/L EPA MCL. HAA5 is a group of five chlorinated and brominated acetic acids. Long-term exposure above the MCL is associated with increased cancer risk and adverse reproductive outcomes. The EPA classifies total HAA5 as a probable human carcinogen at elevated concentrations. Activated carbon filtration (especially granular or block carbon) is effective at reducing HAA5. Running water through a refrigerator filter or letting it sit in an open pitcher for 30 minutes also helps, as some HAA5 species are volatile. Boiling does not remove disinfection byproducts and may concentrate them.

Cities exceeding 60 µg/L EPA MCL

Connecticut
0%
0 of 110 cities
▼ 1% below national rate (better)
National avg
1%
23 of 4420 cities

HAA5 data across Connecticut

Each dot is a city with UCMR 4 HAA5 testing data. Cities where average HAA5 exceeded the 60 µg/L EPA MCL are highlighted. Size reflects population served.

Connecticut city water quality map

All Connecticut cities ranked by haa5 level

# City Level Level Exceeds? Violations Grade
1 Uncasville 49.9 µg/L
No 1
A
2 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 46
F
3 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 7
F
4 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
F
5 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
F
6 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
F
7 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
C-
8 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
C-
9 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
C-
10 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
C-
11 Beacon Falls 49.0 µg/L
No 2
C-
12 Beacon Falls 43.2 µg/L
No 5
F
13 Beacon Falls 42.5 µg/L
No 2
C-
14 Beacon Falls 41.3 µg/L
No 4
F
15 Beacon Falls 39.2 µg/L
No 27
F
16 Groton 39.1 µg/L
No 6
B-
17 Middlebury 38.3 µg/L
No 18
C-
18 Middlebury 38.3 µg/L
No 11
D+
19 Beacon Falls 37.9 µg/L
No 7
F
20 Ansonia 37.9 µg/L
No 2
D
21 Beacon Falls 37.8 µg/L
No 3
C-
22 Beacon Falls 36.9 µg/L
No 7
D
23 Beacon Falls 36.4 µg/L
No 7
D
24 Beacon Falls 36.2 µg/L
No 7
D
25 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 27
F
26 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 32
F
27 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 19
B-
28 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 23
D+
29 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 13
B
30 Franklin 35.1 µg/L
No 13
B
31 Ansonia 32.9 µg/L
No 6
B-
32 Groton 32.7 µg/L
No 17
F
33 Franklin 31.9 µg/L
No 143
F
34 Groton 31.6 µg/L
No 23
D+
35 Ansonia 29.3 µg/L
No 4
D+
36 Ansonia 29.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
37 Ansonia 29.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
38 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 9
C
39 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 33
F
40 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 1
B
41 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 0
A-
42 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 0
A-
43 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 0
A-
44 Berlin 28.9 µg/L
No 0
A-
45 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
46 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
47 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 25
F
48 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
49 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
50 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
51 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
52 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
53 Ansonia 28.3 µg/L
No 0
B+
54 Ansonia 28.2 µg/L
No 18
F
55 Ansonia 28.1 µg/L
No 1
C+
56 Middlebury 28.0 µg/L
No 14
C
57 Ansonia 27.1 µg/L
No 4
C+
58 Harwinton 27.1 µg/L
No 8
F
59 Harwinton 27.1 µg/L
No 19
F
60 Harwinton 27.1 µg/L
No 3
B+
61 Harwinton 27.1 µg/L
No 5
D
62 Ansonia 26.2 µg/L
No 0
C-
63 Ansonia 25.9 µg/L
No 4
D
64 New London 25.2 µg/L
No 16
C-
65 New London 25.2 µg/L
No 0
C+
66 Berlin 25.0 µg/L
No 1
B-
67 Cromwell 24.9 µg/L
No 11
D
68 Cromwell 24.9 µg/L
No 25
F
69 Berlin 24.2 µg/L
No 0
B-
70 Ansonia 24.1 µg/L
No 28
F
71 Bristol 23.5 µg/L
No 18
C
72 Bristol 23.5 µg/L
No 9
C
73 Berlin 23.0 µg/L
No 40
F
74 Ansonia 22.7 µg/L
No 12
F
75 Berlin 22.3 µg/L
No 4
B+
76 Berlin 21.8 µg/L
No 1
D
77 Berlin 21.8 µg/L
No 0
B+
78 Berlin 21.4 µg/L
No 6
F
79 Bristol 20.8 µg/L
No 4
C+
80 Berlin 20.5 µg/L
No 5
C
81 Berlin 20.5 µg/L
No 8
C
82 Bethel 19.5 µg/L
No 135
F
83 Bethel 19.5 µg/L
No 59
F
84 Bethel 19.5 µg/L
No 25
F
85 Berlin 19.3 µg/L
No 3
D+
86 Clinton 19.2 µg/L
No 18
C+
87 Clinton 19.2 µg/L
No 20
D
88 Clinton 19.2 µg/L
No 4
D+
89 Clinton 19.2 µg/L
No 7
C+
90 Clinton 19.2 µg/L
No 0
B-
91 Windham 18.0 µg/L
No 11
B+
92 Berlin 16.9 µg/L
No 4
C
93 Plainville 16.3 µg/L
No 3
C+
94 East Granby 14.7 µg/L
No 24
F
95 East Granby 14.7 µg/L
No 12
C-
96 East Granby 14.7 µg/L
No 1
C+
97 East Granby 14.7 µg/L
No 0
B
98 East Granby 14.1 µg/L
No 85
F
99 East Granby 13.4 µg/L
No 5
C-
100 Mashantucket 12.4 µg/L
No 7
B
101 East Granby 11.7 µg/L
No 9
D
102 East Granby 11.7 µg/L
No 25
F
103 Berlin 9.7 µg/L
No 0
B-
104 Beacon Falls 8.6 µg/L
No 1
A
105 Hampton 5.7 µg/L
No 12
B-
106 Hampton 5.7 µg/L
No 1
B
107 East Windsor 2.6 µg/L
No 6
C+
108 East Lyme 1.9 µg/L
No 6
C
109 East Granby 1.6 µg/L
No 9
F
110 East Granby 0.9 µg/L
No 3
C+

Frequently asked questions about haa5 in Connecticut

What is HAA5 and why does it appear in Connecticut tap water?

HAA5 (haloacetic acids) are disinfection byproducts that form when chlorine reacts with naturally occurring organic matter in source water. They are a normal byproduct of the disinfection process that makes water safe to drink. No cities in Connecticut currently exceed the 60 µg/L EPA MCL. The state average is 27.3 µg/L.

How can I reduce HAA5 exposure from Connecticut drinking water?

Activated carbon filters (granular or block) effectively reduce HAA5. Refrigerator filters and under-sink carbon systems are convenient options. Unlike lead or PFAS, HAA5 levels can also be reduced by letting water stand in an open container, as some species evaporate. Boiling does NOT remove HAA5 and can concentrate them by reducing water volume.

Which Connecticut cities have the highest HAA5 levels?

The cities with the highest average HAA5 concentrations in Connecticut are: Uncasville (49.9 µg/L), Beacon Falls (49.0 µg/L), Beacon Falls (49.0 µg/L), Beacon Falls (49.0 µg/L), Beacon Falls (49.0 µg/L). Note: this data is from UCMR 4 testing (2018–2020) and may not reflect current levels.