Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Suquamish, WA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+, with 7 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
6.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile
7 unresolved violations
653 people served by 3 water systems

PWSID 105300031 · moderate data confidence · native american utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 80.8 / 100

#132 of 294Washington cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Suquamish water safe?

Suquamish's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (80.8/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 653 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

7 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Top half in Washington

Suquamish ranks #132 of 294 graded Washington cities.

See the comparison ↓
Keep watching

7 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Suquamish's drinking water received a grade of B+ (80.8 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 653 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 128 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

Suquamish ranks #132 out of 294 cities in Washington for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state. Suquamish relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. As a small community water system, Suquamish may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 7 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 80.8/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
32.8 / 45C
Lead & CopperLead at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile).
18 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Suquamish's water

Every contaminant flagged in Suquamish, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
1 contaminant tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 6.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Suquamish's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 128 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

7 monitoring & paperwork 3 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Suquamish's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (80.8/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Chlorine.Resolved
Violation3 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Combined Uranium, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U, Combined Radium (-226 and -228).Resolved
Violation3 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATIONFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3227). Coastal Storm event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHEAVY RAINS, SNOW MELT, FLOODING, LAND & MUD SLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-1172). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb2009 — 0 ppb2012 — 1 ppb2013 — 1 ppb2015 — 0 ppb2016 — 1 ppb2018 — 1 ppb2019 — 1 ppb2021 — 4 ppb2024 — 4 ppb420092013201620192024

Up 4 ppb since 2009. Latest reading: 4 ppb (2024) — 27% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Suquamish's water comes from

Suquamish's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under native american ownership.

Delivery

653 people

Residents served across Suquamish's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by native american ownership and serves approximately 653 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
SACKMAN 105300031 500 Groundwater
INDIANOLA 105300085 78 Purchased Groundwater
WEE WUN 105338109 75 Purchased Groundwater

05Pressure on Suquamish's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

2 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

NAVAL BASE KITSAP BANGOR - RANGE ACTIVITIES 0 lb · 5.4 mi
POULSBO READY MIX PLANT 0 lb · 1.3 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

7 federal disaster declarations on record for Kitsap County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3227
HEAVY RAINS, SNOW MELT, FLOODING, LAND & MUD SLIDES Apr 1997 · DR-1172
HIGH WINDS, SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Feb 1996 · DR-1100

Superfund proximity

Multiple tracked sites nearby

4 National Priorities List sites within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Suquamish compares

Scores for nearby Washington cities on one line, with the average marked.

Suquamish (this city)
80.8 · B+
Kent
44.4 · F
Seattle
42.3 · F
Spokane
39.2 · F
Vancouver
32.9 · F
Tacoma
32.2 · F

dashed line = Washington average (53/100)

Suquamish scores 80.8/100above the Washington average of 53/100. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities. Full Washington rankings →

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Suquamish's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 6.0 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Suquamish alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Suquamish, WA tap water safe to drink?

Suquamish's water quality earned a grade of B+ (80.8/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #132 out of 294 cities tested in Washington.

What contaminants are in Suquamish's water?

Lead was measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile). 128 violations are on record.

How is Suquamish's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Suquamish?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Suquamish's water come from?

Suquamish's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 653 residents.

What health violations has Suquamish's water system had?

Suquamish has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in September 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

Is Suquamish's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Suquamish uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 128 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Suquamish's water compare to other cities?

Suquamish ranks #132 out of 294 cities in Washington (better than 55% of state cities) and #7637 out of 15382 cities nationally (50th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Suquamish, WA: Median household income $80,216 · median home value $368,076 · median age 46.1 · 77.5% homeowners · 33.1% college educated. Service area: 2 ZIP codes across Suquamish's county.
Show ZIP codes 9837098392
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.