WaterVerge

Is Rolling Fork, MS Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D+, with 21 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

2K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: MS0630004
Overall Score
50 / 100
Violations
21 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#280 of 320 in Mississippi Top 83% nationally
Local Government
Moderate data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
D+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
50/100
waterverge.com
D+ 50/100

Rolling Fork, MS — Water Quality Report

Rolling Fork's drinking water received a grade of D+ (50 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 2,108 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program.

The system has 387 violations on record, including 7 health-based violations. 21 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Rolling Fork's water

Rolling Fork ranks #280 out of 320 cities in Mississippi for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

Rolling Fork relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

As a small community water system, Rolling Fork may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

The system has seen 16 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
50 out of 100 Grade D+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
20/20
A
Lead at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
17/20
B
PFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Rolling Fork, MS water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Rolling Fork's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D+ (50/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 2,108 residents using groundwater (wells).

21
Active Violations
1.2 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
8 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Rolling Fork

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Rolling Fork's water quality assessment. Grade: D+ (50/100).

Violation
4 drinking water violations recorded

2 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Disaster
HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4626). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE IDA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3569). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Rolling Fork's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 1.2 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Violation history

Rolling Fork's water system has 387 total violations on record, including 7 health-based violations. 21 remain unresolved. 16 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

TTRPTOtherMRMCL
Most recent violations:
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Jul 2024 Consumer Confidence Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Sharkey County has experienced 8 federally declared disasters since 1975. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Big Sunflower River Nr Anguilla.

HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-4626
HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3569
HURRICANE DELTA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3548

Where does Rolling Fork's water come from?

Rolling Fork's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 2,108 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Big Sunflower River Nr Anguilla (river).

What Rolling Fork residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Rolling Fork's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Rolling Fork's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
1.2 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 8% of limit
Safe Level
Compliance Record

Violation summary

387
Total violations
7
Health-based
21
Active / unresolved
Oct 2024
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

387 Total
21 Active
7 Health-based
366 Resolved
2 SNC
Violations by category
Radionuclides and Revised Rad Rule
311
Volatile Organic Chemicals
42
Consumer Confidence Rule
7
Total Coliform Rule
6
Public Notice Rule and Revised PN Rule
5
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2024 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2023 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2023 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jul 2023 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Mar 2022 Active
Groundwater Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Mar 2022 Active
Groundwater Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 2009 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2008 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2008 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jul 2008 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Feb 2007 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jul 2006 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2005 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2004 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2003 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Showing 20 of 387 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D3 — extreme drought

Issaquena County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

6
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
13.9%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
6
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

8
Declared disasters
Oct 2021
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Sharkey County has experienced 8 federally declared disasters since 1975. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Oct 2021
HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #4626
Aug 2021
HURRICANE IDA
Hurricane FEMA #3569
Oct 2020
HURRICANE DELTA
Hurricane FEMA #3548
May 2011
FLOODING
Flood FEMA #1983
May 2011
FLOODING
Flood FEMA #3320
Aug 2008
HURRICANE GUSTAV
Hurricane FEMA #3291

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.2 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 5.8 ppb from 1993 (7.0 ppb) to 2023 (1.2 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
2,108
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Rolling Fork's water comes from

Groundwater

Rolling Fork's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 2,108 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Rolling Fork

Rolling Fork is located near 1 notable water body. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Big Sunflower River Nr Anguilla
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Rolling Fork

System Name PWSID Population Source
CITY OF ROLLING FORK MS0630004 1,808 GW
TALLULA UTILITY DISTRICT MS0280017 300 GW
Regional Comparison

How Rolling Fork compares

Full Mississippi rankings →

Rolling Fork's score of 50/100 is on par with the average of 54/100 among major Mississippi cities. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. 5 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

Rolling Fork (this city)
50
Jackson
47.8
Canton
50
Oxford
40.5
Mississippi avg
54
City Profile

About Rolling Fork, MS

Economic Profile
$41,208
Median Income
$96,449
Median Home Value
$570/mo
Median Rent
18.4%
Unemployment
Community
34.9
Median Age
594
People / sq mi
11.1%
College Educated
49.8%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Rolling Fork, MS tap water safe to drink?

Rolling Fork's water quality earned a grade of D+ (50/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #280 out of 320 cities tested in Mississippi.

What contaminants are in Rolling Fork's water?

Lead was measured at 1.2 ppb (90th percentile). 387 violations are on record.

How is Rolling Fork's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Rolling Fork?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Rolling Fork's water come from?

Rolling Fork's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 2,108 residents.

What health violations has Rolling Fork's water system had?

Rolling Fork has 7 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 21 violations remain unresolved.

Is Rolling Fork's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Rolling Fork uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 387 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Rolling Fork's water compare to other cities?

Rolling Fork ranks #280 out of 320 cities in Mississippi (better than 13% of state cities) and #13120 out of 15744 cities nationally (17th percentile). The grade of D+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.