Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Proctor, MN Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A-, with 1 unresolved violation on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
2.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
1 unresolved violation
3K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MN1690042 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
A 87 / 100

#308 of 466Minnesota cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Proctor water safe?

Proctor's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of A- (87/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 3,099 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

1 unresolved violation on record

EPA records show an open compliance item for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 2.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

3 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Proctor's drinking water received a grade of A- (87 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 3,099 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 3 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 1 remains unresolved.

Proctor ranks #308 out of 466 cities in Minnesota for water quality, placing it below average in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. As a small community water system, Proctor may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 87/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
41 / 45A
Lead & CopperLead at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Proctor's water

Every contaminant flagged in Proctor, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
1 contaminant tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Proctor's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 3 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 1 remains unresolved.

9 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

3 monitoring & paperwork 1 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Proctor's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (87/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS, Chlorine.Open
Lead, 90th percentileppb

2ppb(2023)

One sampling round on record — 13% of the 15ppb EPA action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Proctor's water comes from

Proctor's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

3,099 people

Residents served across Proctor's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,099 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
Proctor MN1690042 3,099 Purchased Surface Water

Water bodies near Proctor

Nemadji River · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Proctor's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Proctor's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 27 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

ME GLOBAL INC — manganese and manganese compounds 27 lb · 5.1 mi
PRIMARY PRODUCTS INGREDIENTS AMERICAS LLC - DULUTH 0 lb · 2.6 mi
COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA INC 0 lb · 6.1 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

Drought

D2 — severe drought

Saint Louis County is in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity3 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years14 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years25.2%

06How Proctor compares

Scores for nearby Minnesota cities on one line, with the average marked.

Bloomington
93.6 · A
Proctor (this city)
87 · A-
Brooklyn Park
81.5 · B+
St. Paul
73.3 · B-
Minneapolis
72.8 · B-
Rochester
69.7 · C+

dashed line = Minnesota average (82/100)

Proctor scores 87/100on par with the Minnesota average of 82/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Minnesota rankings →

St. Louis water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Proctor's water — not generic advice.

Extra protection

A basic carbon filter still helps

Proctor's water meets federal standards, but a simple carbon filter improves taste and adds a margin of safety against short-term issues.

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Proctor alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Proctor, MN tap water safe to drink?

Proctor's water quality earned a grade of A- (87/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #308 out of 466 cities tested in Minnesota.

What contaminants are in Proctor's water?

Lead was measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile). 3 violations are on record.

How is Proctor's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Proctor?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Proctor's water come from?

Proctor's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 3,099 residents.

How does Proctor's water compare to other cities?

Proctor ranks #308 out of 466 cities in Minnesota (better than 34% of state cities) and #4291 out of 15382 cities nationally (72th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does Proctor's small water system affect quality?

Proctor's system serves approximately 3,099 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 3 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Proctor, MN: Proctor is a city in Saint Louis County, Minnesota, United States. Established in 1894, the town was named after former Kentucky Governor J. Proctor Knott. It is part of the Duluth Metropolitan Area. The population was 3,120 at the 2020 census. Median household income $80,385 · median home value $197,811 · median age 44.1 · 73.7% homeowners · 27.8% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across St. Louis.
Show ZIP codes 55810
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.