Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Pataskala, OH Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+ — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
1.6 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
7 unresolved violations
49K people served by 2 water systems

PWSID OH2503411 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 80.3 / 100

#262 of 511Ohio cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Pataskala water safe?

Pataskala's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (80.3/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 48,900 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 93.70 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 1.6 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 26.0000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Pataskala's drinking water received a grade of B+ (80.3 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 48,900 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 1.6 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 2 PFAS compounds in the water supply. The system has 30 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

Pataskala ranks #262 out of 511 cities in Ohio for water quality, placing it below average in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.28 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

How the 80.3/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
39.8 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at 1.6 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants2 PFAS compounds detected.
15.6 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Pataskala's water

Every contaminant flagged in Pataskala, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

11 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
26.0000 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
26.0 µg/L 43% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
630.6 µg/L 42% of limit
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
54.7 µg/L 26% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
8.58 µg/L 21% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
0.51 µg/L 2% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
0.6 µg/L 1% of limit
40 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 12 detected Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.6 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 93.70 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 26.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Pataskala's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 30 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

9 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 monitoring & paperwork 1 still unresolved
PFAS2 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Pataskala's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (80.3/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATIONFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3250). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0200040006000EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 3.4 ppb1993 — 3.7 ppb1994 — 0 ppb1995 — 6 ppb1996 — 0 ppb1997 — 5.2 ppb1998 — 11 ppb2000 — 0 ppb2001 — 14 ppb2002 — 5 ppb2003 — 5 ppb2004 — 0 ppb2005 — 5000 ppb2007 — 0 ppb2010 — 0 ppb2011 — 14 ppb2013 — 0 ppb2014 — 0 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2017 — 0 ppb2018 — 0 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 1.6 ppb2022 — 1.5 ppb2023 — 2.3 ppb2024 — 1.6 ppb2025 — 1.6 ppb3.41.6199219982005201620222025

Down 1.8 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 1.6 ppb (2025) — 11% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
050010001500EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L2004 — 1160 mg/L2005 — 94 mg/L11609420042005

Down 1066 mg/L since 2004. The latest reading (94 mg/L, 2005) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Pataskala's water comes from

Pataskala's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

48,900 people

Residents served across Pataskala's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 48,900 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
WESTERVILLE CITY PWS OH2503411 39,000 Surface Water
PATASKALA CITY OH4502512 9,900 Groundwater

Water bodies near Pataskala

South Fork Licking River At Kirkersville · river Raccoon Creek Near Granville · river Blacklick Creek At Reynoldsburg · river Blacklick Creek Near Pickerington · river Sycamore Creek Below Pickerington · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Pataskala's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Pataskala's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

SCHAFER DRIVELINE LLC 0 lb · 5.4 mi
ALADDIN MANUFACTURING CARPET CUSHION - JOHNSTOWN OH 0 lb · 9.8 mi
TECH INTERNATIONAL (JOHNSTOWN) 0 lb · 9.7 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

3 federal disaster declarations on record for Licking County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3250
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING Jun 1989 · DR-831
HEAVY RAINS & FLOODING Jun 1968 · DR-243

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Pataskala compares

Scores for nearby Ohio cities on one line, with the average marked.

Cleveland
85.5 · A-
Pataskala (this city)
80.3 · B+
Toledo
78 · B
Kent
38.2 · F
Cincinnati
36.8 · F
Columbus
35.5 · F

dashed line = Ohio average (58/100)

Pataskala scores 80.3/100above the Ohio average of 58/100. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities. Full Ohio rankings →

Franklin water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Pataskala's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 2 PFAS compounds detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Pataskala alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Pataskala, OH tap water safe to drink?

Pataskala's water quality earned a grade of B+ (80.3/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #262 out of 511 cities tested in Ohio.

What contaminants are in Pataskala's water?

Lead was measured at 1.6 ppb (90th percentile). 2 PFAS compounds were detected. 30 violations are on record.

How is Pataskala's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Pataskala?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Pataskala's water come from?

Pataskala's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 48,900 residents.

What health violations has Pataskala's water system had?

Pataskala has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

How does Pataskala's water compare to other cities?

Pataskala ranks #262 out of 511 cities in Ohio (better than 49% of state cities) and #7807 out of 15382 cities nationally (49th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Pataskala, OH: Pataskala is a city in Licking County, Ohio, United States, approximately 19 miles (31 km) east of Columbus. The population was 17,886 at the 2020 census. Pataskala was a small community until 1996, when what was then the village of Pataskala merged with Lima Township, vastly increasing its population and geographic area. Median household income $87,246 · median home value $237,601 · median age 36.2 · 73.8% homeowners · 28.7% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 2 ZIP codes across Franklin.
Show ZIP codes 4306243073
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.