Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Mercer, MO Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D+, with 9 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
13.7 ppb lead, 90th percentile
9 unresolved violations
4K people served by 2 water systems

PWSID MO2024382 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 54.5 / 100

#440 of 487Missouri cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Mercer water safe?

Mercer's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D+ (54.5/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,518 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

9 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
Context

4K people, 2 systems

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

Lead is approaching its limit

Measured at 13.7 ppb — 91% of the 15 ppb limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Mercer's drinking water received a grade of D+ (54.5 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,518 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 13.7 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. UCMR 5 testing detected 2 PFAS compounds in the water supply. The system has 50 violations on record, including 18 health-based violations. 9 remain unresolved.

Mercer ranks #440 out of 487 cities in Missouri for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. The system has seen 16 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 54.5/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
14.3 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 13.7 ppb (90th percentile).
10 / 20D
Contaminants2 PFAS compounds detected.
18.2 / 20A
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Mercer's water

Every contaminant flagged in Mercer, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
9.6000 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
9.6 µg/L 16% of limit
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 4 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 13.7 15 ppb Inorganic Near Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 9.600 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.013 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Mercer's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 50 violations on record, including 18 health-based violations. 9 remain unresolved.

4 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

10 health-based in 10 yrs 11 monitoring & paperwork 4 still unresolved
PFAS2 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Mercer's water quality assessment. Grade: D+ (54.5/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATIONFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3232). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 0 ppb1994 — 0 ppb1995 — 5 ppb1998 — 0 ppb2001 — 0 ppb2004 — 1.1 ppb2007 — 2.1 ppb2010 — 3.6 ppb2011 — 1.6 ppb2013 — 1.6 ppb2014 — 1.2 ppb2016 — 1.2 ppb2017 — 1.3 ppb2019 — 1.3 ppb2020 — 1.8 ppb2022 — 1.8 ppb2023 — 0 ppb2025 — 14 ppb14199320012011201720232025

Up 14 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 14 ppb (2025) — 91% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Mercer's water comes from

Mercer's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

3,518 people

Residents served across Mercer's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,518 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
MERCER COUNTY PWSD 1 MO2024382 3,200 Purchased Surface Water
MERCER PWS MO2010515 318 Purchased Groundwater

05Pressure on Mercer's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

3 federal disaster declarations on record for Mercer County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3232
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING Jul 1993 · DR-995
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING Nov 1973 · DR-407

06How Mercer compares

Scores for nearby Missouri cities on one line, with the average marked.

Kansas City
79.2 · B
Chesterfield
74.8 · B-
Columbia
61.4 · C
Mercer (this city)
54.5 · D+
O Fallon
43.4 · F
Springfield
37.1 · F

dashed line = Missouri average (67/100)

Mercer scores 54.5/100below the Missouri average of 67/100. It outscores 3 of 10 nearby cities. Full Missouri rankings →

Harrison water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Mercer's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. Lead detected at 13.7 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Mercer alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercer, MO tap water safe to drink?

Mercer's water quality earned a grade of D+ (54.5/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #440 out of 487 cities tested in Missouri.

What contaminants are in Mercer's water?

Lead was measured at 13.7 ppb (90th percentile). 2 PFAS compounds were detected. 50 violations are on record.

How is Mercer's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Mercer?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Mercer's water come from?

Mercer's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 3,518 residents.

What health violations has Mercer's water system had?

Mercer has 18 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 9 violations remain unresolved.

How does Mercer's water compare to other cities?

Mercer ranks #440 out of 487 cities in Missouri (better than 10% of state cities) and #12375 out of 15382 cities nationally (20th percentile). The grade of D+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Mercer, MO: Mercer is a city in Mercer County, Missouri, United States. The population was 263 at the 2020 census. Median household income $45,625 · median home value $76,189 · median age 50.9 · 63.2% homeowners · 11.7% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Harrison.
Show ZIP codes 64661
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.