WaterVerge

Is Forks, WA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

5K residents served 4 water systems PWSID: WA5326000
Overall Score
45 / 100
Violations
53 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#251 of 294 in Washington Top 91% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
DGRADE
Water Quality Grade
45/100
waterverge.com
D 45/100

Forks, WA — Water Quality Report

Forks's drinking water received a grade of D (45 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 5,282 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals.

The system has 942 violations on record, including 8 health-based violations. 53 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Forks's water

Forks ranks #251 out of 294 cities in Washington for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

Forks relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

The system has seen 36 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
45 out of 100 Grade D
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
16/20
B
No PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Forks, WA water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Forks's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (45/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 4 water systems serve approximately 5,282 residents using groundwater (wells).

53
Active Violations
2.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
None
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Forks

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Forks's water quality assessment. Grade: D (45/100).

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3629). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Chlorine, Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule, Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Disaster
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, SNOWSTORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODIN

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4650). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Forks's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 2.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 1.70 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

Violation history

Forks's water system has 942 total violations on record, including 8 health-based violations. 53 remain unresolved. 36 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MRRPTMONOtherTTMCL
Most recent violations:
Sep 2025 Chlorine Resolved
Sep 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open
Aug 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Resolved
Jul 2025 Consumer Confidence Rule Open
Jul 2025 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Clallam County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1979. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Hoh River, Bogachiel River, Calawah River.

SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA DR-3629
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, SNOWSTORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODIN
Flood FEMA DR-4650
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA DR-4635

Where does Forks's water come from?

Forks's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 4 water systems serving approximately 5,282 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Hoh River (river), Bogachiel River (river), Calawah River (river).

What Forks residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Forks's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Forks's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
2.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 13% of limit
Safe Level
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
1.70 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +20% over limit
Exceeds Limit
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
0
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

942
Total violations
8
Health-based
53
Active / unresolved
Sep 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

942 Total
53 Active
8 Health-based
889 Resolved
6 SNC
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
424
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
185
Inorganic Chemicals
93
Total Coliform Rule
63
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
41
Sep 2025 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2025 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2025 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Apr 2025 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Feb 2025 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Nov 2024 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Sep 2024 Active
Groundwater Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Mar 2024 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2023 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Dec 2022 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2020 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2019 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Showing 20 of 942 violations
Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Dec 2025
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Clallam County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1979. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Dec 2025
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #3629
Mar 2022
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, SNOWSTORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODIN
Flood FEMA #4650
Jan 2022
SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES
Flood FEMA #4635
Feb 2016
SEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND A T
Flood FEMA #4253
Jan 2009
SEVERE WINTER STORM, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #1817
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Coastal Storm FEMA #3227

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Forks's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.70 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 5.0 ppb from 1992 (7.0 ppb) to 2024 (2.0 ppb).

Copper level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
Copper has decreased by 4.750 mg/L from 1993 (6.450 mg/L) to 2012 (1.700 mg/L).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
5,282
Water Systems
4
Water Source

Where Forks's water comes from

Groundwater

Forks's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 5,282 people through 4 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Forks

Forks is located near 3 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Hoh River
river
Bogachiel River
river
Calawah River
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Forks

System Name PWSID Population Source
FORKS MUNICIPAL WATER DEPT WA5326000 4,744 GW
OLYMPIC CORRECTIONS CENTER WA5313560 390 GW
HOH TRIBE 105300011 120 GW
SMITHVILLE WA53AA101 28 GW
Regional Comparison

How Forks compares

Full Washington rankings →

Forks's score of 45/100 is below the average of 53/100 among major Washington cities. It outscores 5 of 10 nearby cities.

Forks (this city)
45
Seattle
42.3
Tacoma
32.2
Vancouver
32.9
Spokane
39.2
Kent
44.4
Washington avg
53
City Profile

About Forks, WA

Wikipedia →

Forks, also previously known as the unincorporated town of Quillayute, is a town in southwest Clallam County, Washington, United States. The population was 3,335 at the 2020 census. It is named after the forks in the nearby Bogachiel, Calawah, and Sol Duc rivers which join to form the Quillayute River.

Economic Profile
$42,080
Median Income
$833/mo
Median Rent
8%
Unemployment
Community
33.9
Median Age
317
People / sq mi
20.3%
College Educated
56.9%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Forks, WA tap water safe to drink?

Forks's water quality earned a grade of D (45/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #251 out of 294 cities tested in Washington.

What contaminants are in Forks's water?

Lead was measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 942 violations are on record.

How is Forks's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Forks?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Forks's water come from?

Forks's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 4 water systems serving approximately 5,282 residents.

What health violations has Forks's water system had?

Forks has 8 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in September 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 53 violations remain unresolved.

Is Forks's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Forks uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 942 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Forks's water compare to other cities?

Forks ranks #251 out of 294 cities in Washington (better than 15% of state cities) and #14239 out of 15744 cities nationally (10th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.