Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Everett, WA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
3.5 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
31 unresolved violations
282K people served by 10 water systems

PWSID WA5324050 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 45.4 / 100

#249 of 294Washington cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Everett water safe?

Everett's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (45.4/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 10 water systems serve approximately 282,350 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.80 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 3.5 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

25 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Everett's drinking water received a grade of D (45.4 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 10 water systems serve approximately 282,350 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 3.5 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 229 violations on record, including 16 health-based violations. 31 remain unresolved.

Everett ranks #249 out of 294 cities in Washington for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Haloacetic acid (HAA5) levels were elevated at 36.3 µg/L in UCMR 4 testing, though below the 60 µg/L EPA limit. Activated carbon filtration can help reduce these disinfection byproducts. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.34 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. The system has seen 25 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 45.4/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
3.6 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 3.5 ppb (90th percentile).
14 / 20C
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
15.8 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Everett's water

Every contaminant flagged in Everett, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

8 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
93.0 µg/L 44% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
108.0 µg/L 7% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
2.2 µg/L 4% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
0.28 µg/L 1% of limit
38 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 8 detected Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 3.5 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.80 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Everett's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 229 violations on record, including 16 health-based violations. 31 remain unresolved.

3 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

35 monitoring & paperwork 21 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Everett's water quality assessment. Grade: D (45.4/100).
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3629). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4539). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
01020304050EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 13 ppb1993 — 21 ppb1994 — 12 ppb1995 — 8 ppb1996 — 41 ppb1997 — 8 ppb1998 — 6 ppb1999 — 7 ppb2000 — 3 ppb2001 — 2 ppb2002 — 10 ppb2003 — 3 ppb2005 — 2 ppb2006 — 3 ppb2008 — 2 ppb2009 — 2.6 ppb2010 — 1.9 ppb2011 — 2 ppb2012 — 2.1 ppb2013 — 2.3 ppb2014 — 2 ppb2015 — 4 ppb2017 — 3 ppb2018 — 2 ppb2020 — 2.5 ppb2021 — 1.4 ppb2023 — 1.8 ppb2024 — 3.2 ppb133.2199219982005201220202024

Down 9.8 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 3.2 ppb (2024) — 21% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L

4.2mg/L(1993)

One sampling round on record — 325% of the 1.3mg/L EPA action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Everett's water comes from

Everett's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

10 systems

10 water systems (3 wholesalers), operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

282,350 people

Residents served across Everett's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 282,350 people through 10 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
EVERETT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CITY OF WA5324050 215,774 Surface Water
SNO PUD 1 - LAKE STEVENS WA5380907 60,064 Purchased Surface Water
SNO PUD 1 - WARM BEACH WA5393000 2,890 Groundwater
SNO PUD 1 - MAY CREEK WA5352105 1,364 Groundwater
SNO PUD 1 - STORM LAKE RIDGE WA5344431 786 Purchased Surface Water
SNO PUD 1 - SUNDAY LAKE WA5385205 561 Groundwater
SNO PUD 1 - SKYLITE TRACTS WA5380220 415 Groundwater
HAT ISLAND COMMUNITY INC WA5331593 348 Surface Water
SNO PUD 1- CRESWELL WA5306325 100 Purchased Surface Water
RIVERSIDE WATER DIST #1 WA5372844 48 Purchased Surface Water

Water bodies near Everett

Pilchuck River · river Snohomish River · river Mission Creek · river West Fork Tulalip Creek · river East Fork Tulalip Creek · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Everett's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Everett's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 13 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES - EVERETT — copper 13 lb · 4.9 mi
ELDEC AEROSPACE CORP 0 lb · 8.7 mi
ACHILLES USA INC 0 lb · 4.0 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Snohomish County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Dec 2025 · DR-3629
SEVERE STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Apr 2020 · DR-4539
SEVERE WINTER STORM, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND FLOODING Jan 2009 · DR-1817

06How Everett compares

Scores for nearby Washington cities on one line, with the average marked.

Everett (this city)
45.4 · D
Kent
44.4 · F
Seattle
42.3 · F
Spokane
39.2 · F
Vancouver
32.9 · F
Tacoma
32.2 · F

dashed line = Washington average (53/100)

Everett scores 45.4/100below the Washington average of 53/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Washington rankings →

Snohomish water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Everett's water — not generic advice.

Because of copper

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Everett alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Everett, WA tap water safe to drink?

Everett's water quality earned a grade of D (45.4/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #249 out of 294 cities tested in Washington.

What contaminants are in Everett's water?

Lead was measured at 3.5 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 229 violations are on record.

How is Everett's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Everett?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Everett's water come from?

Everett's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 10 water systems serving approximately 282,350 residents.

What health violations has Everett's water system had?

Everett has 16 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 31 violations remain unresolved.

How does Everett's water compare to other cities?

Everett ranks #249 out of 294 cities in Washington (better than 15% of state cities) and #13858 out of 15382 cities nationally (10th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Everett, WA: Everett is the county seat of and the most populous city in Snohomish County, Washington, United States. It is 25 miles (40 km) north of Seattle and is one of the main cities in the metropolitan area and the Puget Sound region. Everett is the seventh-most populous city in the state, with 110,629 residents as of the 2020 census. The city is primarily situated on a peninsula at the mouth of the Snohomish River along Port Gardner Bay, an inlet of Possession Sound, and extends to the south and west. Median household income $77,806 · median home value $468,656 · median age 36.4 · 48.5% homeowners · 26.9% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 7 ZIP codes across Snohomish.
Show ZIP codes 98201982039820498206982079820898213
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.