Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Darrington, WA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
2.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
28 unresolved violations
2K people served by 3 water systems

PWSID WA5317950 · moderate data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 46 / 100

#246 of 294Washington cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Darrington water safe?

Darrington's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (46/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 2,368 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.81 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 2.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

116 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Darrington's drinking water received a grade of D (46 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 2,368 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 256 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 28 remain unresolved.

Darrington ranks #246 out of 294 cities in Washington for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Darrington relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. As a small community water system, Darrington may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 116 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 46/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Darrington's water

Every contaminant flagged in Darrington, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
2 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.81 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Darrington's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 256 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 28 remain unresolved.

2 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

2 health-based in 10 yrs 159 monitoring & paperwork 15 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Darrington's water quality assessment. Grade: D (46/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3629). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation4 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule, Revised Total Coliform Rule, Chlorine.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4539). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1994 — 5 ppb1995 — 6 ppb1996 — 1 ppb1998 — 5 ppb1999 — 0 ppb2002 — 2 ppb2005 — 2 ppb2007 — 8 ppb2008 — 1 ppb2009 — 4.5 ppb2011 — 1 ppb2012 — 8.5 ppb2013 — 1 ppb2015 — 2 ppb2016 — 1 ppb2018 — 1 ppb2019 — 1 ppb2021 — 1.2 ppb2022 — 2.3 ppb2025 — 2 ppb52199419992008201320192025

Down 3 ppb since 1994. Latest reading: 2 ppb (2025) — 13% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L

1.8mg/L(1998)

One sampling round on record — 139% of the 1.3mg/L EPA action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Darrington's water comes from

Darrington's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

2,368 people

Residents served across Darrington's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 2,368 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
Darrington Town of WA5317950 2,246 Groundwater
SAUK-SUIATTLE 105311106 80 Groundwater
DARRINGTON WATER ASSOCIATION WA5317945 42 Groundwater

Water bodies near Darrington

Sauk River Ab White Chuck River Nr Darrington · river Sauk River · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Darrington's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Snohomish County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Dec 2025 · DR-3629
SEVERE STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Apr 2020 · DR-4539
SEVERE WINTER STORM, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND FLOODING Jan 2009 · DR-1817

06How Darrington compares

Scores for nearby Washington cities on one line, with the average marked.

Darrington (this city)
46 · D
Kent
44.4 · F
Seattle
42.3 · F
Spokane
39.2 · F
Vancouver
32.9 · F
Tacoma
32.2 · F

dashed line = Washington average (53/100)

Darrington scores 46/100below the Washington average of 53/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Washington rankings →

Snohomish water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Darrington's water — not generic advice.

Because of copper

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Darrington alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Darrington, WA tap water safe to drink?

Darrington's water quality earned a grade of D (46/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #246 out of 294 cities tested in Washington.

What contaminants are in Darrington's water?

Lead was measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile). 256 violations are on record.

How is Darrington's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Darrington?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Darrington's water come from?

Darrington's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 2,368 residents.

What health violations has Darrington's water system had?

Darrington has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 28 violations remain unresolved.

Is Darrington's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Darrington uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 256 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Darrington's water compare to other cities?

Darrington ranks #246 out of 294 cities in Washington (better than 16% of state cities) and #13710 out of 15382 cities nationally (11th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Darrington, WA: Darrington is a town in Snohomish County, Washington, United States. It is located in a North Cascades mountain valley formed by the Sauk and North Fork Stillaguamish rivers. Darrington is connected to nearby areas by State Route 530, which runs along the two rivers towards the city of Arlington, located 30 miles (48 km) to the west, and Rockport. It had a population of 1,462 at the 2020 census. Median household income $48,750 · median home value $324,546 · median age 45 · 63.6% homeowners · 26.1% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Snohomish.
Show ZIP codes 98241
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.