Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is City, UT Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A-, with 7 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
7 unresolved violations
522 people served by 1 water system

PWSID UTAH18046 · moderate data confidence · private utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
A 89.4 / 100

#24 of 177Utah cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is City water safe?

City's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of A- (89.4/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 522 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

7 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Stay informed

Check back after the next refresh

EPA data updates on a rolling basis; we fold in new samples and violations every month.

Get alerts ↓

City's drinking water received a grade of A- (89.4 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 522 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 31 violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

City ranks #24 out of 177 cities in Utah for water quality, placing it above average in the state. City relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. As a small community water system, City may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 89.4/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
42.4 / 45A
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in City's water

Every contaminant flagged in City, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
1 contaminant tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03City's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 31 violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

All ten of the last ten years were clean — no EPA violations recorded for City.

UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into City's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (89.4/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Nitrate, Fluoride.Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 3 ppb1994 — 3 ppb1995 — 3 ppb1996 — 3 ppb1997 — 3 ppb2002 — 3 ppb2004 — 3 ppb2005 — 3 ppb2010 — 5.1 ppb2013 — 0.84 ppb2016 — 4.9 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2025 — 0 ppb2027 — 0 ppb30199319962004201320252027

Down 3 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2027) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where City's water comes from

City's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under private ownership.

Delivery

522 people

Residents served across City's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by private ownership and serves approximately 522 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
SILVER LAKE COMPANY UTAH18046 522 Groundwater

05Pressure on City's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Drought

D3 — extreme drought

Salt Lake County is in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity22 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years22 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years20.5%

06How City compares

Scores for nearby Utah cities on one line, with the average marked.

City (this city)
89.4 · A-
West Jordan
65.1 · C+
Lehi
44.9 · F
Orem
40.7 · F
Sandy
39.5 · F

dashed line = Utah average (50/100)

City scores 89.4/100above the Utah average of 50/100. It outscores 10 of 10 nearby cities. Full Utah rankings →

Salt Lake water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in City's water — not generic advice.

Extra protection

A basic carbon filter still helps

City's water meets federal standards, but a simple carbon filter improves taste and adds a margin of safety against short-term issues.

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for City alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is City, UT tap water safe to drink?

City's water quality earned a grade of A- (89.4/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #24 out of 177 cities tested in Utah.

What contaminants are in City's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 31 violations are on record.

How is City's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in City?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does City's water come from?

City's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 522 residents.

What health violations has City's water system had?

City has 3 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2016. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

Is City's groundwater at risk of contamination?

City uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 31 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does City's water compare to other cities?

City ranks #24 out of 177 cities in Utah (better than 86% of state cities) and #2856 out of 15382 cities nationally (81th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does City's small water system affect quality?

City's system serves approximately 522 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 31 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.