Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Camas, WA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C — but Copper and PFOS were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
2.5 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
10 unresolved violations
32K people served by 2 water systems

PWSID WA5310800 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
C 63.1 / 100

#188 of 294Washington cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Camas water safe?

Camas's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C (63.1/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 32,017 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.80 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 2.5 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

Vanadium is approaching its limit

Measured at 16.30 µg/L — 78% of the 21 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Camas's drinking water received a grade of C (63.1 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 32,017 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.5 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 3 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 164 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

Camas ranks #188 out of 294 cities in Washington for water quality, placing it below average in the state. Camas relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 1.60 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. The system has seen 6 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 63.1/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
22.7 / 45D
Lead & CopperLead at 2.5 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants3 PFAS compounds detected.
11.4 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Camas's water

Every contaminant flagged in Camas, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

8 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
164.0 µg/L 78% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
16.30 µg/L 78% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
168.0 µg/L 11% of limit
37 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 10 detected · 2 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 4.10 (above the 1.0 threshold) Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.5 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.80 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.004 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.012 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Camas's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 164 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

3 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 31 monitoring & paperwork 8 still unresolved
PFAS3 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Camas's water quality assessment. Grade: C (63.1/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Nitrate.Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND A TFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4253). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
020406080EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 8 ppb1993 — 7 ppb1996 — 54 ppb2001 — 7 ppb2002 — 3 ppb2003 — 3 ppb2006 — 1 ppb2009 — 4 ppb2010 — 0 ppb2012 — 2.5 ppb2013 — 0 ppb2015 — 2 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2017 — 0 ppb2018 — 1.3 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 4 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2024 — 1.5 ppb2025 — 2.5 ppb82.5199220022010201620212025

Down 5.5 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 2.5 ppb (2025) — 17% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
00.5011.522.5EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1992 — 1.6 mg/L1993 — 1.8 mg/L1.61.819921993

Up 0.20 mg/L since 1992. The latest reading (1.8 mg/L, 1993) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Camas's water comes from

Camas's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems (1 wholesaler), operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

32,017 people

Residents served across Camas's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 32,017 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
CAMAS MUNICIPAL WATER SEWER SYSTEM WA5310800 31,794 Groundwater
PINE COVE RV PARK CA5301008 223 Groundwater

Water bodies near Camas

Kelly Creek · river Beaver Creek · river Johnson Creek · river Kelley Creek · river Fairview Creek · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Camas's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 87 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

BOEING CO OF PORTLAND — nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution) 62 lb · 4.3 mi
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER OPERATIONS LLC — 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol 12 lb · 1.7 mi
EXTERIOR WOOD INC — copper compounds 12 lb · 4.6 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

5 federal disaster declarations on record for Clark County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, MUDSLIDES, AND A T Feb 2016 · DR-4253
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3227
HIGH WINDS, SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Feb 1996 · DR-1100

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Camas compares

Scores for nearby Washington cities on one line, with the average marked.

Camas (this city)
63.1 · C
Kent
44.4 · F
Seattle
42.3 · F
Spokane
39.2 · F
Vancouver
32.9 · F
Tacoma
32.2 · F

dashed line = Washington average (53/100)

Camas scores 63.1/100above the Washington average of 53/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full Washington rankings →

Clark water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Camas's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Camas alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Camas, WA tap water safe to drink?

Camas's water quality earned a grade of C (63.1/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #188 out of 294 cities tested in Washington.

What contaminants are in Camas's water?

Lead was measured at 2.5 ppb (90th percentile). 3 PFAS compounds were detected. 164 violations are on record.

How is Camas's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Camas?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Camas's water come from?

Camas's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 32,017 residents.

What health violations has Camas's water system had?

Camas has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 10 violations remain unresolved.

Is Camas's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Camas uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 164 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Why does Camas have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

3 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Camas's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Camas's water compare to other cities?

Camas ranks #188 out of 294 cities in Washington (better than 36% of state cities) and #11606 out of 15382 cities nationally (25th percentile). The grade of C reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Camas, WA: Median household income $133,829 · median home value $603,040 · median age 40.3 · 79.9% homeowners · 52.5% college educated. Service area: 1 ZIP code across Clark.
Show ZIP codes 98607
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.