Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Byron, GA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+ — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
4.7 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
8 unresolved violations
10K people served by 1 water system

PWSID GA2250000 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 82.2 / 100

#143 of 372Georgia cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Byron water safe?

Byron's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (82.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 9,653 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 2.00 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 4.7 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

A flood-prone service area

6 federal disaster declarations on record. After severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories.

See the risk factors ↓

Byron's drinking water received a grade of B+ (82.2 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 9,653 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 4.7 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 13 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 8 remain unresolved.

Byron ranks #143 out of 372 cities in Georgia for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state. Byron relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

How the 82.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
43.9 / 45A
Lead & CopperLead at 4.7 ppb (90th percentile).
14 / 20C
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
19.2 / 20A
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
0 / 10F
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Byron's water

Every contaminant flagged in Byron, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 4.7 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 2.00 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Byron's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 13 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 8 remain unresolved.

9 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 monitoring & paperwork
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Byron's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (82.2/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE MICHAELFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4400). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE MICHAELFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3406). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0102030EPA action level · 15 ppb2000 — 4.4 ppb2004 — 13 ppb2005 — 2.5 ppb2006 — 3.3 ppb2007 — 24 ppb2008 — 4 ppb2009 — 2.6 ppb2010 — 5.8 ppb2012 — 15 ppb2013 — 7.1 ppb2014 — 5.1 ppb2017 — 2.6 ppb2020 — 5.4 ppb2023 — 4.7 ppb4.44.7200020062009201320202023

Up 0.30 ppb since 2000. Latest reading: 4.7 ppb (2023) — 31% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
01234EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1993 — 2.8 mg/L1994 — 1.8 mg/L1995 — 2.5 mg/L2004 — 1.5 mg/L2007 — 2.2 mg/L2009 — 2 mg/L2.821993199520072009

Down 0.80 mg/L since 1993. The latest reading (2 mg/L, 2009) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Byron's water comes from

Byron's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

9,653 people

Residents served across Byron's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 9,653 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
BYRON GA2250000 9,653 Groundwater

Water bodies near Byron

Echeconnee Creek · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Byron's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 194 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

SOLENIS LLC — zinc compounds 194 lb · 6.3 mi
BYRON READY MIX 0 lb · 2.6 mi
BLUE BIRD BODY CO 0 lb · 9.8 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

6 federal disaster declarations on record for Peach County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-4400
HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-3406
HURRICANE IRMA Sep 2017 · DR-4338

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Byron compares

Scores for nearby Georgia cities on one line, with the average marked.

Decatur
84.8 · B+
Morrow
83.6 · B+
Byron (this city)
82.2 · B+
Marietta
82.2 · B+
Alpharetta
41.4 · F
Atlanta
37.2 · F

dashed line = Georgia average (61/100)

Byron scores 82.2/100above the Georgia average of 61/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full Georgia rankings →

Peach water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Byron's water — not generic advice.

Because of copper

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Byron alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Byron, GA tap water safe to drink?

Byron's water quality earned a grade of B+ (82.2/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #143 out of 372 cities tested in Georgia.

What contaminants are in Byron's water?

Lead was measured at 4.7 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 13 violations are on record.

How is Byron's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Byron?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Byron's water come from?

Byron's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 9,653 residents.

Is Byron's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Byron uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 13 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Byron's water compare to other cities?

Byron ranks #143 out of 372 cities in Georgia (better than 62% of state cities) and #7019 out of 15382 cities nationally (54th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Byron, GA: Median household income $83,996 · median home value $198,681 · median age 36 · 84.6% homeowners · 28.6% college educated. Service area: 1 ZIP code across Peach.
Show ZIP codes 31008
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.