Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Bunn, MO Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C+ — but PFOS was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
0.9 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
33 unresolved violations
6K people served by 1 water system

PWSID NC0235108 · high data confidence · private utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
C 65.6 / 100

#411 of 487Missouri cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Bunn water safe?

Bunn's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C+ (65.6/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 5,890 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

PFOS is over its legal limit

Measured at 0.0048 µg/L against the EPA MCL of 0.004 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.9 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

12 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Bunn's drinking water received a grade of C+ (65.6 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 5,890 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.9 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 110 violations on record, including 17 health-based violations. 33 remain unresolved.

Bunn ranks #411 out of 487 cities in Missouri for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. The system has seen 12 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 65.6/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
24.8 / 45D
Lead & CopperLead at 0.9 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
11.8 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Bunn's water

Every contaminant flagged in Bunn, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over MCL — EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels, which utilities must meet by 2029. These compounds don't break down in the body or the environment. Reverse osmosis (NSF/ANSI 58) or certified granular activated carbon (NSF/ANSI 53) removes them at the tap.
Exceeds MCL What to do →
Manganese Inorganic
14.7 µg/L 29% of limit
33 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 4 detected · 1 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 1.20 (above the 1.0 threshold)

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.9 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS 0.005 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Bunn's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 110 violations on record, including 17 health-based violations. 33 remain unresolved.

5 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

13 monitoring & paperwork 6 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Bunn's water quality assessment. Grade: C+ (65.6/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb2005 — 0 ppb2006 — 0 ppb2007 — 0 ppb2008 — 3 ppb2010 — 0 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2025 — 0.90 ppb0.9020052007201020192025

Up 0.90 ppb since 2005. Latest reading: 0.90 ppb (2025) — 6% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Bunn's water comes from

Bunn's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under private ownership.

Delivery

5,890 people

Residents served across Bunn's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by private ownership and serves approximately 5,890 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
LAKE ROYALE S/D NC0235108 5,890 Purchased Surface Water

Water bodies near Bunn

Creve Coeur Creek At Chesterfield · river Creve Coeur Creek Near Creve Coeur · river Fee Fee Creek Near Bridgeton · river River Des Peres Near University City · river River Des Peres Tributary At Pagedale · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Bunn's drinking water supply.

05How Bunn compares

Scores for nearby Missouri cities on one line, with the average marked.

Kansas City
79.2 · B
Chesterfield
74.8 · B-
Bunn (this city)
65.6 · C+
Columbia
61.4 · C
O Fallon
43.4 · F
Springfield
37.1 · F

dashed line = Missouri average (67/100)

Bunn scores 65.6/100on par with the Missouri average of 67/100. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. Full Missouri rankings →

Franklin water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

06What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Bunn's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Bunn alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Bunn, MO tap water safe to drink?

Bunn's water quality earned a grade of C+ (65.6/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #411 out of 487 cities tested in Missouri.

What contaminants are in Bunn's water?

Lead was measured at 0.9 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 110 violations are on record.

How is Bunn's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Bunn?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Bunn's water come from?

Bunn's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 5,890 residents.

What health violations has Bunn's water system had?

Bunn has 17 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 33 violations remain unresolved.

How does Bunn's water compare to other cities?

Bunn ranks #411 out of 487 cities in Missouri (better than 16% of state cities) and #11307 out of 15382 cities nationally (27th percentile). The grade of C+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.