WaterVerge

Is Moca, PR Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Chlorate was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

125K residents served 3 water systems PWSID: PR0003293
Overall Score
38.3 / 100
Violations
11 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Surface water
#91 of 101 in Puerto Rico Top 98% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
FGRADE
Water Quality Grade
38.3/100
waterverge.com
F 38.3/100

Moca, PR — Water Quality Report

Moca's drinking water received a grade of F (38.3 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 125,150 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. UCMR 5 testing detected 6 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 833 violations on record, including 175 health-based violations. 11 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Moca's water

Moca ranks #91 out of 101 cities in Puerto Rico for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Haloacetic acid (HAA5) levels were elevated at 44.5 µg/L in UCMR 4 testing, though below the 60 µg/L EPA limit. Activated carbon filtration can help reduce these disinfection byproducts.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 3.02 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection.

The system has seen 31 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
38.3 out of 100 Grade F
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
0/45
F
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
17/20
B
Lead at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
7.3/20
F
6 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
10/10
A
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Surface water.
Water Safety

Is Moca, PR water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Moca's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (38.3/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 125,150 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

11
Active Violations
6.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
6 compounds
PFAS Detected

Recent water quality updates for Moca

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
6 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Moca's water quality assessment. Grade: F (38.3/100).

Violation
4 drinking water violations recorded

2 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Violation
3 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Nitrate.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Nitrate.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Moca's water supply.

Lead Elevated
Detected: 6.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Within EPA limits but above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended level of 1 ppb. An NSF 53-certified filter provides additional protection.

PFAS (6 compounds) Elevated
Detected: Highest: lithium at 23.7200 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts) Elevated
Detected: 44.5 µg/L Limit: 60 µg/L (EPA MCL)

Elevated disinfection byproduct levels. These form when chlorine interacts with organic matter during water treatment.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 6 PFAS compounds in Moca's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
lithium 23.7200 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFPeA 0.0067 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFBA 0.0057 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFOS 0.0053 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL

Violation history

Moca's water system has 833 total violations on record, including 175 health-based violations. 11 remain unresolved. 31 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

TTRPTMRMONMCLOther
Most recent violations:
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Jul 2024 Nitrate Resolved

Where does Moca's water come from?

Moca's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 3 water systems serving approximately 125,150 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Canal Principal Diversion (stream), Lago Guerrero Nr Isabela (lake), Canal Principal Diversion Abv. Lago Guerrero (stream), Canal De Moca (stream), Lago Regulador De Isabela Nr Hwy 112 Isabela (lake).

What Moca residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Moca's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
6.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 40% of limit
Safe Level
lithium
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
23.7200 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Near MCL
44.5 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 74% of limit
ElevatedUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 19.0 µg/LHAA9: 62.8 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
3.02 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 30% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
637.3 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 42% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Elevated
42.8 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 86% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
Vanadium
Inorganic
Elevated
19.10 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 91% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
1115.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
Lithium
Inorganic
Detected
23.7 µg/L
State screening level: 60 µg/L · 40% of limit
DetectedNo federal MCLUCMR 5 Data (2023–2025)
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
6
Detected
1
Exceed EPA MCL
1.32
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0053 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

833
Total violations
175
Health-based
11
Active / unresolved
Oct 2024
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

833 Total
11 Active
175 Health-based
822 Resolved
1 SNC
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
253
Synthetic Organic Chemicals
178
Total Coliform Rule
78
Surface Water Treatment Rule
68
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
52
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2023 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2020 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jan 2016 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2014 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2012 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Jul 2024 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2024
Jul 2024 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2024
Jul 2024 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2024
Jan 2024 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Mar 2024
Jan 2024 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Mar 2024
Jan 2023 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Monitoring
Monitoring Resolved Mar 2023
Oct 2022 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Oct 2022
Oct 2022 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Monitoring
Monitoring Resolved Dec 2022
Jul 2022 Resolved
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Monitoring
Monitoring Resolved Sep 2022
Showing 20 of 833 violations

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Moca's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead detected at 6.0 ppb
Read our guide →
🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 6.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 23.720 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA 0.006 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFBS 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS 0.005 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.007 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 1.0 ppb from 1992 (5.0 ppb) to 2015 (6.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
125,150
Water Systems
3
Source breakdown
Groundwater
2
Surface Water
1
Water Source

Where Moca's water comes from

Surface Water

Moca's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 125,150 people through 3 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Moca

Moca is located near 5 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Canal Principal Diversion
stream
Lago Guerrero Nr Isabela
lake
Canal Principal Diversion Abv. Lago Guerrero
stream
Canal De Moca
stream
Lago Regulador De Isabela Nr Hwy 112 Isabela
lake
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Moca

System Name PWSID Population Source
AGUADILLA PR0003293 123,885 SW
ACUED. CORRECCIONAL GUERRERO PR0303023 1,100 GW
JARDIN DEL ATLANTICO PR0303013 165 GW
Regional Comparison

How Moca compares

Full Puerto Rico rankings →

Moca's score of 38.3/100 is on par with the average of 38/100 among major Puerto Rico cities. It outscores 3 of 10 nearby cities. 6 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

Moca (this city)
38.3
Bayamon
38.5
Bayamon
38.5
Bayamon
38.5
Ponce
34.9
Mayaguez
42.1
Puerto Rico avg
38
City Profile

About Moca, PR

Wikipedia →

Aguadilla, founded in 1775 by Luis de Córdova, is a city and municipality located in the northwestern tip of Puerto Rico, bordered by the Atlantic Ocean to the north and west, north of Aguada, and Moca and west of Isabela. Aguadilla is spread over 15 barrios and Aguadilla Pueblo. It is a principal city and core of the Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastián Metropolitan Statistical Area. This region was already inhabited and known as Aguadilla before 1770. Nevertheless, according to Dr. Agustín Stahl in his Foundation of Aguadilla, it was not until 1780 that the town was officially founded. The construction of a new church and the proceedings to become an independent village began in 1775.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Moca, PR tap water safe to drink?

Moca's water quality earned a grade of F (38.3/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #91 out of 101 cities tested in Puerto Rico.

What contaminants are in Moca's water?

Lead was measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile). 6 PFAS compounds were detected. 833 violations are on record.

How is Moca's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Moca?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Moca's water come from?

Moca's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 125,150 residents.

What health violations has Moca's water system had?

Moca has 175 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 11 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Moca have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

6 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Moca's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Moca's water compare to other cities?

Moca ranks #91 out of 101 cities in Puerto Rico (better than 10% of state cities) and #15345 out of 15744 cities nationally (3th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.