Head-to-head water quality
Tucson, AZ vs Guttenberg Town-0903, NJ
Side-by-side water quality comparison: Tucson (Grade F) vs Guttenberg Town-0903 (Grade D+). Lead, PFAS, violations, and source-water contamination
Score breakdown
Each factor is shown as raw points (out of the maximum). Higher = better.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
Violations subscore / 45
0.0
20.2
Guttenberg Town-0903
Lead/Copper subscore / 20
20.0
13.0
Tucson
Contaminant subscore / 20
5.1
8.3
Guttenberg Town-0903
Compliance subscore / 10
8.0
5.0
Tucson
Source subscore / 5
5.0
4.0
Tucson
Lead & copper at the tap
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) 90th-percentile readings — the value that 10% of sampled homes exceed.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
Lead 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 15 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
Tucson
Copper 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
—
—
—
PFAS — "forever chemicals"
UCMR 5 testing, 2023–2025. Federal MCLs: PFOA + PFOS = 4 ng/L; HFPO-DA = 10 ng/L.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
PFAS analytes detected
8 of 30
8 of 30
Tie
PFAS exceeds federal MCL
Yes
Yes
Tie
PFAS hazard index · Sum of (max/MCL) across detected analytes; > 1 indicates exceedance
2.75
5.53
Tucson
Violation history
SDWA enforcement actions — fewer is better.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
Violations (last 5 years)
469
13
Guttenberg Town-0903
Health-based violations (total)
150
4
Guttenberg Town-0903
Unresolved violations
1,177
21
Guttenberg Town-0903
Other contaminants tested
UCMR rounds 1–4 + UCMR 5 lithium. Maxima where data exists; "—" means not tested.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
Chromium-6 (max)
9.40 µg/L
0.33 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
HAA5 (avg)
1.42 µg/L
17.18 µg/L
Tucson
Manganese (max)
120.00 µg/L
50.20 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
Strontium (max)
1700.00 µg/L
170.00 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
1,4-Dioxane (max)
6.70 µg/L
0.13 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
NDMA (max)
—
11.00 ng/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
Perchlorate (max)
11.90 µg/L
—
Tucson
Vanadium (max)
11.00 µg/L
1.10 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
Chlorate (max)
1100.00 µg/L
380.00 µg/L
Guttenberg Town-0903
Molybdenum (max)
15.00 µg/L
—
Tucson
Industrial proximity
Superfund National Priorities List + Toxic Release Inventory facilities within 10 miles of the city centroid.
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Better
Superfund sites within 10 mi
1
0
Guttenberg Town-0903
TRI lbs to surface water within 10 mi (2023)
0
0
Tie
System size & source
Factor
Tucson
Guttenberg Town-0903
Population served
894K
804K
—
Water source
Groundwater
Surface water
—
Number of water systems
82
2
—
See the full reports
Frequently asked
Which has better water — Tucson or Guttenberg Town-0903?
Guttenberg Town-0903, NJ scores higher (50.6 vs 38.1) on WaterVerge's 100-point methodology, earning a Grade D+ compared to Tucson's Grade F. The score combines violation history, lead and copper levels, contaminant testing, monitoring compliance, and source-water type.
How is the WaterVerge water quality score calculated?
The grade combines five subscores: violation history (45 pts, weighted by recency and health-based severity), lead/copper 90th-percentile vs EPA action levels (20 pts), contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, and Superfund/TRI proximity (20 pts), monitoring compliance (10 pts), and water-source-type risk (5 pts). Full methodology at /about/methodology.
Where does this water quality data come from?
From the EPA's public records: the SDWIS bulk download (violations + system info), UCMR rounds 1–5 (unregulated contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, vanadium, lithium), the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (industrial polluters), the Superfund National Priorities List, the USGS Powell Domestic-Well Database (private-well chemistry), and the CDC Community Water Fluoridation system. Data is refreshed quarterly.