WaterVerge

Head-to-head water quality

Bryn Mawr, PA vs Fort Worth, TX

Side-by-side water quality comparison: Bryn Mawr (Grade F) vs Fort Worth (Grade F). Lead, PFAS, violations, and source-water contamination

Score breakdown

Each factor is shown as raw points (out of the maximum). Higher = better.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
Violations subscore / 45
0.0
0.0
Tie
Lead/Copper subscore / 20
16.0
18.0
Fort Worth
Contaminant subscore / 20
4.2
7.5
Fort Worth
Compliance subscore / 10
10.0
5.0
Bryn Mawr
Source subscore / 5
4.0
4.0
Tie

Lead & copper at the tap

Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) 90th-percentile readings — the value that 10% of sampled homes exceed.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
Lead 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 15 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
0.0 µg/L
Bryn Mawr
Copper 90th-percentile (latest) · EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
1.4 mg/L
Bryn Mawr

PFAS — "forever chemicals"

UCMR 5 testing, 2023–2025. Federal MCLs: PFOA + PFOS = 4 ng/L; HFPO-DA = 10 ng/L.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
PFAS analytes detected
10 of 30
8 of 30
Fort Worth
PFAS exceeds federal MCL
Yes
Yes
Tie
PFAS hazard index · Sum of (max/MCL) across detected analytes; > 1 indicates exceedance
9.43
3.90
Fort Worth

Violation history

SDWA enforcement actions — fewer is better.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
Violations (last 5 years)
147
144
Fort Worth
Health-based violations (total)
36
25
Fort Worth
Unresolved violations
58
221
Bryn Mawr

Other contaminants tested

UCMR rounds 1–4 + UCMR 5 lithium. Maxima where data exists; "—" means not tested.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
Chromium-6 (max)
2.60 µg/L
0.14 µg/L
Fort Worth
HAA5 (avg)
25.99 µg/L
5.56 µg/L
Fort Worth
Manganese (max)
81.00 µg/L
4.19 µg/L
Fort Worth
Strontium (max)
817.00 µg/L
330.00 µg/L
Fort Worth
1,4-Dioxane (max)
2.20 µg/L
Bryn Mawr
NDMA (max)
15.00 ng/L
6.00 ng/L
Fort Worth
Vanadium (max)
2.10 µg/L
1.60 µg/L
Fort Worth
Chlorate (max)
838.00 µg/L
720.00 µg/L
Fort Worth
Molybdenum (max)
8.50 µg/L
2.50 µg/L
Fort Worth

Industrial proximity

Superfund National Priorities List + Toxic Release Inventory facilities within 10 miles of the city centroid.

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Better
Superfund sites within 10 mi
8
1
Fort Worth
TRI lbs to surface water within 10 mi (2023)
43
1,369
Bryn Mawr

System size & source

Factor
Bryn Mawr
Fort Worth
Population served
1.1M
964K
Water source
Surface water
Surface water
Number of water systems
25
14

See the full reports

Frequently asked

Which has better water — Bryn Mawr or Fort Worth?
Fort Worth, TX scores higher (34.5 vs 34.2) on WaterVerge's 100-point methodology, earning a Grade F compared to Bryn Mawr's Grade F. The score combines violation history, lead and copper levels, contaminant testing, monitoring compliance, and source-water type.
How is the WaterVerge water quality score calculated?
The grade combines five subscores: violation history (45 pts, weighted by recency and health-based severity), lead/copper 90th-percentile vs EPA action levels (20 pts), contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, and Superfund/TRI proximity (20 pts), monitoring compliance (10 pts), and water-source-type risk (5 pts). Full methodology at /about/methodology.
Where does this water quality data come from?
From the EPA's public records: the SDWIS bulk download (violations + system info), UCMR rounds 1–5 (unregulated contaminant testing including PFAS, chromium-6, HAA5, NDMA, perchlorate, vanadium, lithium), the EPA Toxic Release Inventory (industrial polluters), the Superfund National Priorities List, the USGS Powell Domestic-Well Database (private-well chemistry), and the CDC Community Water Fluoridation system. Data is refreshed quarterly.