Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Uxbridge, MA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A- — but Copper, PFOS and 1 more were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

3 contaminants over a legal limit
1.3 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
1 unresolved violation
12K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MA2304000 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
A 87.5 / 100

#70 of 269Massachusetts cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Uxbridge water safe?

Uxbridge's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of A- (87.5/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 11,525 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.40 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 1.3 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

A flood-prone service area

10 federal disaster declarations on record. After severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories.

See the risk factors ↓

Uxbridge's drinking water received a grade of A- (87.5 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 11,525 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 3 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 24 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 1 remains unresolved.

Uxbridge ranks #70 out of 269 cities in Massachusetts for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state. Uxbridge relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.09 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

How the 87.5/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
43.1 / 45A
Lead & CopperLead at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants3 PFAS compounds detected.
13.4 / 20C
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Uxbridge's water

Every contaminant flagged in Uxbridge, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

9 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over MCL — EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels, which utilities must meet by 2029. These compounds don't break down in the body or the environment. Reverse osmosis (NSF/ANSI 58) or certified granular activated carbon (NSF/ANSI 53) removes them at the tap.
Exceeds MCL What to do →
Manganese Inorganic
204.0 µg/L 120% of limit
1,4-Dioxane Organic
0.11 µg/L 31% of limit
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
54.0 µg/L 26% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
110.0 µg/L 7% of limit
38 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 11 detected · 1 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 1.68 (above the 1.0 threshold) Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.3 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.40 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS 0.007 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Uxbridge's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 24 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 1 remains unresolved.

All ten of the last ten years were clean — no EPA violations recorded for Uxbridge.

PFAS3 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Uxbridge's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (87.5/100).
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4780). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE LEEFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3599). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 13 ppb2001 — 2 ppb2002 — 2 ppb2003 — 15 ppb2004 — 4 ppb2005 — 4 ppb2006 — 1 ppb2007 — 10 ppb2010 — 2 ppb2013 — 0 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2019 — 2.5 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2025 — 1.3 ppb131.3199220032006201320222025

Down 12 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 1.3 ppb (2025) — 9% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
02468EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1992 — 5.8 mg/L2002 — 1.4 mg/L2007 — 1.4 mg/L5.81.4199220022007

Down 4.4 mg/L since 1992. The latest reading (1.4 mg/L, 2007) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Uxbridge's water comes from

Uxbridge's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

11,525 people

Residents served across Uxbridge's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 11,525 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
UXBRIDGE DPW, WATER DIVISION MA2304000 11,525 Groundwater

Water bodies near Uxbridge

Blackstone River, W. Main St., · river Blackstone River · river West River Below West Hill Dam, Nr Uxbridge · river Blackstone River, Rt 122 Bridge · river Nipmuc River · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Uxbridge's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Worcester County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING May 2024 · DR-4780
HURRICANE LEE Sep 2023 · DR-3599
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3350

Drought

D2 — severe drought

Worcester County is in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity6 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years12 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years8.0%

06How Uxbridge compares

Scores for nearby Massachusetts cities on one line, with the average marked.

Uxbridge (this city)
87.5 · A-
Beverly
87.5 · A-
Springfield
82.9 · B+
Cambridge
81 · B+
Worcester
78.9 · B
Boston
76.8 · B

dashed line = Massachusetts average (81/100)

Uxbridge scores 87.5/100above the Massachusetts average of 81/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full Massachusetts rankings →

Worcester water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Uxbridge's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Uxbridge alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Uxbridge, MA tap water safe to drink?

Uxbridge's water quality earned a grade of A- (87.5/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #70 out of 269 cities tested in Massachusetts.

What contaminants are in Uxbridge's water?

Lead was measured at 1.3 ppb (90th percentile). 3 PFAS compounds were detected. 24 violations are on record.

How is Uxbridge's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Uxbridge?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Uxbridge's water come from?

Uxbridge's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 11,525 residents.

What health violations has Uxbridge's water system had?

Uxbridge has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in June 2016. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 1 violation remains unresolved.

Is Uxbridge's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Uxbridge uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 24 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Why does Uxbridge have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

3 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Uxbridge's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Uxbridge's water compare to other cities?

Uxbridge ranks #70 out of 269 cities in Massachusetts (better than 74% of state cities) and #3962 out of 15382 cities nationally (74th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Uxbridge, MA: Uxbridge is a town in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States, first colonized in 1662 and incorporated in 1727. It was originally part of the town of Mendon, and named for the Earl of Uxbridge. The town is located 36 mi (58 km) southwest of Boston and 15 mi (24 km) south-southeast of Worcester, at the midpoint of the Blackstone Valley National Historic Park. The historical society notes that Uxbridge is the "Heart of The Blackstone Valley" and is also known as "the Cradle of the Industrial Revolution". Uxbridge was a prominent Textile center in the American Industrial Revolution. Uxbridge was an early center for rural engagement in the American anti-slavery movement. The age of computing started here with IBM’s first, chief engineer and lab. Uxbridge "weaves a tapestry of early America". Median household income $124,682 · median home value $399,726 · median age 42.9 · 81.4% homeowners · 36.3% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 2 ZIP codes across Worcester.
Show ZIP codes 0153801569
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.