Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Union Church, MS Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B-, with 8 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
0.5 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
8 unresolved violations
1K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MS0320004 · high data confidence · public/private utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 74 / 100

#148 of 319Mississippi cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Union Church water safe?

Union Church's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B- (74/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 1,456 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

8 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.5 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 9.4000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Union Church's drinking water received a grade of B- (74 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 1,456 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.5 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 130 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 8 remain unresolved.

Union Church ranks #148 out of 319 cities in Mississippi for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state. Union Church relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. As a small community water system, Union Church may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 23 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 74/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
24.7 / 45D
Lead & CopperLead at 0.5 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
16.2 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Union Church's water

Every contaminant flagged in Union Church, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

3 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
9.4000 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
9.4 µg/L 16% of limit
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 3 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.5 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 9.400 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Union Church's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 130 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 8 remain unresolved.

4 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 41 monitoring & paperwork 3 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Union Church's water quality assessment. Grade: B- (74/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4626). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4626). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 6 ppb1994 — 6 ppb1995 — 0 ppb1996 — 3 ppb1999 — 6 ppb2002 — 6 ppb2014 — 1.4 ppb2020 — 8.6 ppb2024 — 0.50 ppb60.5019931995199920142024

Down 5.5 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 0.50 ppb (2024) — 3% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Union Church's water comes from

Union Church's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under public/private ownership.

Delivery

1,456 people

Residents served across Union Church's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by public/private ownership and serves approximately 1,456 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
UNION CHURCH WATERWORKS ASSN MS0320004 1,456 Groundwater

05Pressure on Union Church's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Jefferson County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE IDA Oct 2021 · DR-4626
HURRICANE IDA Oct 2021 · DR-4626
HURRICANE IDA Aug 2021 · DR-3569

06How Union Church compares

Scores for nearby Mississippi cities on one line, with the average marked.

Union Church (this city)
74 · B-
Gulfport
52 · D+
Canton
50 · D
Hattiesburg
48.8 · D
Jackson
47.8 · D
Oxford
40.5 · F

dashed line = Mississippi average (54/100)

Union Church scores 74/100above the Mississippi average of 54/100. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities. Full Mississippi rankings →

Jefferson water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Union Church's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Union Church alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Union Church, MS tap water safe to drink?

Union Church's water quality earned a grade of B- (74/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #148 out of 319 cities tested in Mississippi.

What contaminants are in Union Church's water?

Lead was measured at 0.5 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 130 violations are on record.

How is Union Church's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Union Church?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Union Church's water come from?

Union Church's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 1,456 residents.

What health violations has Union Church's water system had?

Union Church has 5 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 8 violations remain unresolved.

Is Union Church's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Union Church uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 130 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Union Church's water compare to other cities?

Union Church ranks #148 out of 319 cities in Mississippi (better than 54% of state cities) and #9834 out of 15382 cities nationally (36th percentile). The grade of B- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does Union Church's small water system affect quality?

Union Church's system serves approximately 1,456 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 130 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Service area: 1 ZIP code across Jefferson.
Show ZIP codes 39668
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.