Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is St. Peter, MN Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A+. lithium was detected — within EPA limits, but worth understanding. Here's the full picture. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
1.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
None unresolved violations
12K people served by 2 water systems

PWSID MN1520006 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
A 97.7 / 100

#10 of 466Minnesota cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is St. Peter water safe?

Based on EPA testing data, St. Peter's tap water is generally safe to drink. The water system earned a grade of A+ (97.7/100), meeting federal drinking water standards across key contaminant categories. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 11,847 residents using groundwater (wells).

The headline

Nothing over a legal limit

Every contaminant measured in St. Peter's water is within its EPA limit, and no violations are unresolved.

See the testing ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 1.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 9.5000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

St. Peter's drinking water received a grade of A+ (97.7 out of 100), indicating excellent water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 11,847 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 4 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. All violations have been resolved.

St. Peter ranks #10 out of 466 cities in Minnesota for water quality, placing it one of the best in the state. St. Peter relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter.

How the 97.7/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
44.4 / 45A
Lead & CopperLead at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
18.2 / 20A
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in St. Peter's water

Every contaminant flagged in St. Peter, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

6 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
9.5000 µg/L 120% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
297.0 µg/L 20% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
9.5 µg/L 16% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
1.2 µg/L 2% of limit
35 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 6 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 9.500 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03St. Peter's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 4 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. All violations have been resolved.

9 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into St. Peter's water quality assessment. Grade: A+ (97.7/100).
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4797). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4442). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Coliform (TCR).Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
01020304050EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 13 ppb1993 — 5.2 ppb1999 — 12 ppb2002 — 8 ppb2005 — 7 ppb2008 — 8 ppb2011 — 3 ppb2013 — 43 ppb2014 — 2 ppb2017 — 2 ppb2020 — 2 ppb2023 — 1 ppb13119922002201120172023

Down 12 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 1 ppb (2023) — 7% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where St. Peter's water comes from

St. Peter's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems (1 wholesaler), operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

11,847 people

Residents served across St. Peter's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 11,847 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
Saint Peter MN1520006 11,784 Groundwater
Lakes and Links Homeowners Association MN1400019 63 Groundwater

05Pressure on St. Peter's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

HUBBARD FEEDS INC 0 lb · 9.9 mi
ADM 0 lb · 9.9 mi
CCM - MANKATO NORTH 0 lb · 9.3 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Nicollet County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Jun 2024 · DR-4797
SEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING Jun 2019 · DR-4442
SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING Sep 2018 · DR-4390

06How St. Peter compares

Scores for nearby Minnesota cities on one line, with the average marked.

St. Peter (this city)
97.7 · A+
Bloomington
93.6 · A
Brooklyn Park
81.5 · B+
St. Paul
73.3 · B-
Minneapolis
72.8 · B-
Rochester
69.7 · C+

dashed line = Minnesota average (82/100)

St. Peter scores 97.7/100above the Minnesota average of 82/100. It outscores 10 of 10 nearby cities. Full Minnesota rankings →

Nicollet water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in St. Peter's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for St. Peter alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is St. Peter, MN tap water safe to drink?

St. Peter's water quality earned a grade of A+ (97.7/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #10 out of 466 cities tested in Minnesota.

What contaminants are in St. Peter's water?

Lead was measured at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 4 violations are on record.

How is St. Peter's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in St. Peter?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does St. Peter's water come from?

St. Peter's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 11,847 residents.

What health violations has St. Peter's water system had?

St. Peter has 1 health-based violation on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2017. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. All health violations have been resolved.

Is St. Peter's groundwater at risk of contamination?

St. Peter uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 4 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does St. Peter's water compare to other cities?

St. Peter ranks #10 out of 466 cities in Minnesota (better than 98% of state cities) and #65 out of 15382 cities nationally (100th percentile). The grade of A+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About St. Peter, MN: Median household income $67,255 · median home value $213,522 · median age 34.3 · 62% homeowners · 29.4% college educated. Service area: 1 ZIP code across Nicollet.
Show ZIP codes 56082
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.