Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Sparta, GA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D — but Lead and Copper were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
19.5 ppb lead, 90th percentile
61 unresolved violations
5K people served by 3 water systems

PWSID GA1410001 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 45.8 / 100

#335 of 372Georgia cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Sparta water safe?

Sparta's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (45.8/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 4,575 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Lead is over its legal limit

Measured at 19.5 ppb against the EPA Action Level of 15 ppb. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

No forever chemicals detected

UCMR 5 laboratory testing found no PFAS compounds above detection thresholds in this system.

See PFAS results ↓
Keep watching

18 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Sparta's drinking water received a grade of D (45.8 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 4,575 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 19.5 ppb (90th percentile), which exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 103 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 61 remain unresolved.

Sparta ranks #335 out of 372 cities in Georgia for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb, which typically indicates aging lead service lines or lead solder in the distribution system. An NSF 53-certified filter is strongly recommended for drinking and cooking water. The system has seen 18 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 45.8/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
17.8 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 19.5 ppb (90th percentile).
2 / 20F
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
19 / 20A
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
3 / 10F
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Sparta's water

Every contaminant flagged in Sparta, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 15 ppb

Exceeds the EPA action level. Lead enters at the service line, not the treatment plant — your address matters more than the city average. Lead service line replacement and an NSF 53-certified point-of-use filter are recommended.
Exceeds LimitFilter: NSF-53 What to do →
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 19.5 15 ppb Inorganic Over Limit
Copper (90th percentile) 3.10 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Sparta's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 103 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 61 remain unresolved.

1 of the last ten years was clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 27 monitoring & paperwork 15 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Sparta's water quality assessment. Grade: D (45.8/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
DisasterHURRICANE HELENEFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4830). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Surface Water Treatment Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterHURRICANE MICHAELFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4400). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0510152025EPA action level · 15 ppb2002 — 1.2 ppb2003 — 2.5 ppb2005 — 4.7 ppb2006 — 7.2 ppb2007 — 7.8 ppb2008 — 2.5 ppb2009 — 4 ppb2010 — 3 ppb2011 — 0 ppb2012 — 9.1 ppb2013 — 3.2 ppb2015 — 0 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2020 — 6.7 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2023 — 0 ppb2025 — 5.5 ppb2026 — 20 ppb1.220200220072011201620252026

Up 18 ppb since 2002. The latest reading (20 ppb, 2026) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
01000200030004000EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1998 — 3300 mg/L2007 — 1.9 mg/L2012 — 1.4 mg/L2025 — 3.1 mg/L33003.11998200720122025

Down 3297 mg/L since 1998. The latest reading (3.1 mg/L, 2025) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Sparta's water comes from

Sparta's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

4,575 people

Residents served across Sparta's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 4,575 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
SPARTA GA1410001 2,903 Surface Water
HANCOCK CO-GA15E/DEVEREAU WS GA1410019 1,512 Purchased Surface Water
MAYFIELD WATER SYSTEM GA1410002 160 Groundwater

05Pressure on Sparta's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

7 federal disaster declarations on record for Hancock County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE HELENE Sep 2024 · DR-4830
HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-4400
HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-3406

06How Sparta compares

Scores for nearby Georgia cities on one line, with the average marked.

Decatur
84.8 · B+
Morrow
83.6 · B+
Marietta
82.2 · B+
Sparta (this city)
45.8 · D
Alpharetta
41.4 · F
Atlanta
37.2 · F

dashed line = Georgia average (61/100)

Sparta scores 45.8/100below the Georgia average of 61/100. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. Full Georgia rankings →

Hancock water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Sparta's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF 53-certified pitcher or under-sink filter. Lead level (19.5 ppb) exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Sparta alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Sparta, GA tap water safe to drink?

Sparta's water quality earned a grade of D (45.8/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #335 out of 372 cities tested in Georgia.

What contaminants are in Sparta's water?

Lead was measured at 19.5 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 103 violations are on record.

How is Sparta's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Sparta?

Yes — lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. We recommend an NSF 53-certified filter or reverse osmosis system. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Sparta's water come from?

Sparta's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 4,575 residents.

What health violations has Sparta's water system had?

Sparta has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 61 violations remain unresolved.

How does Sparta's water compare to other cities?

Sparta ranks #335 out of 372 cities in Georgia (better than 10% of state cities) and #13825 out of 15382 cities nationally (10th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Sparta, GA: Median household income $22,102 · median home value $53,420 · median age 26.9 · 41.8% homeowners · 11.3% college educated. Service area: 1 ZIP code across Hancock.
Show ZIP codes 31087
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.