Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Snow Hill, MD Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+ — but Chlorate was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
3 unresolved violations
2K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MD0230007 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 84.7 / 100

#32 of 107Maryland cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Snow Hill water safe?

Snow Hill's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (84.7/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 2,409 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Chlorate is over its legal limit

Measured at 2000.0 µg/L against the EPA Lifetime HA of 210 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

2 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Snow Hill's drinking water received a grade of B+ (84.7 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 2,409 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 30 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 3 remain unresolved.

Snow Hill ranks #32 out of 107 cities in Maryland for water quality, placing it mid-range in the state. Snow Hill relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.06 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. As a small community water system, Snow Hill may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 84.7/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
36.6 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
15.1 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Snow Hill's water

Every contaminant flagged in Snow Hill, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
2000.0 µg/L 120% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
170.0 µg/L 11% of limit
4 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 4 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5 Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Snow Hill's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 30 violations on record, including 4 health-based violations. 3 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

4 health-based in 10 yrs 4 monitoring & paperwork 1 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Snow Hill's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (84.7/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: TTHM.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE SANDYFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4091). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE SANDYFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3349). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1996 — 5 ppb1997 — 0 ppb1999 — 6 ppb2002 — 0 ppb2005 — 0 ppb2008 — 0 ppb2011 — 0 ppb2014 — 0 ppb2017 — 2 ppb2020 — 2 ppb2023 — 0 ppb5019962002201120202023

Down 5 ppb since 1996. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2023) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Snow Hill's water comes from

Snow Hill's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

2,409 people

Residents served across Snow Hill's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 2,409 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
TOWN OF SNOW HILL MD0230007 2,409 Groundwater

Water bodies near Snow Hill

Nassawango Creek · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Snow Hill's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

1 facility within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

TYSON FARMS INC FEED MILL SNOW HILL 0 lb · 0.4 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

7 federal disaster declarations on record for Worcester County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE SANDY Nov 2012 · DR-4091
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3349
HURRICANE IRENE Sep 2011 · DR-4034

Drought

D2 — severe drought

Worcester County is in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity14 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years14 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years13.1%

06How Snow Hill compares

Scores for nearby Maryland cities on one line, with the average marked.

Laurel
95 · A+
Snow Hill (this city)
84.7 · B+
Columbia
66 · C+
Millersville
41.6 · F
Baltimore
39.8 · F
Frederick
37.5 · F

dashed line = Maryland average (60/100)

Snow Hill scores 84.7/100above the Maryland average of 60/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full Maryland rankings →

Worcester water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Snow Hill's water — not generic advice.

Extra protection

A basic carbon filter still helps

Snow Hill's water meets federal standards, but a simple carbon filter improves taste and adds a margin of safety against short-term issues.

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Snow Hill alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Snow Hill, MD tap water safe to drink?

Snow Hill's water quality earned a grade of B+ (84.7/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #32 out of 107 cities tested in Maryland.

What contaminants are in Snow Hill's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 30 violations are on record.

How is Snow Hill's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Snow Hill?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Snow Hill's water come from?

Snow Hill's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 2,409 residents.

What health violations has Snow Hill's water system had?

Snow Hill has 4 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2023. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 3 violations remain unresolved.

Is Snow Hill's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Snow Hill uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 30 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Snow Hill's water compare to other cities?

Snow Hill ranks #32 out of 107 cities in Maryland (better than 70% of state cities) and #5694 out of 15382 cities nationally (63th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does Snow Hill's small water system affect quality?

Snow Hill's system serves approximately 2,409 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 30 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Snow Hill, MD: Snow Hill is a town serving as the county seat of Worcester County, Maryland, United States. The population was 2,156 at the 2020 census. It is part of the Salisbury, Maryland-Delaware Metropolitan Statistical Area. Median household income $51,667 · median home value $175,309 · median age 39.2 · 62.1% homeowners · 27% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Worcester.
Show ZIP codes 21863
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.