Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Saxton, PA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
6.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile
29 unresolved violations
2K people served by 1 water system

PWSID PA4050021 · moderate data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
F 42 / 100

#432 of 559Pennsylvania cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Saxton water safe?

Saxton's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (42/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 1,675 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.80 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
Context

2K people, 1 system

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

67 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Saxton's drinking water received a grade of F (42 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 1,675 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 258 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 29 remain unresolved.

Saxton ranks #432 out of 559 cities in Pennsylvania for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. As a small community water system, Saxton may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 67 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 42/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile).
13 / 20C
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Saxton's water

Every contaminant flagged in Saxton, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
2 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 6.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.80 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Saxton's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 258 violations on record, including 5 health-based violations. 29 remain unresolved.

1 of the last ten years was clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

2 health-based in 10 yrs 88 monitoring & paperwork 27 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Saxton's water quality assessment. Grade: F (42/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Public Notice.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule.Resolved
DisasterREMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDAFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4618). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE SANDYFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4099). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
010203040EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 32 ppb1994 — 6 ppb32619931994

Down 26 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 6 ppb (1994) — 40% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
0123EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1993 — 2.6 mg/L1994 — 1.8 mg/L2.61.819931994

Down 0.80 mg/L since 1993. The latest reading (1.8 mg/L, 1994) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Saxton's water comes from

Saxton's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

1,675 people

Residents served across Saxton's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 1,675 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
SAXTON MUNI WATER AUTH PA4050021 1,675 Surface Water

Water bodies near Saxton

Raystown Branch Juniata River At Saxton · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Saxton's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Saxton's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

1 facility within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

CARGILL FEED & NUTRITION MARTINSBURG 0 lb · 8.6 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

10 federal disaster declarations on record for Bedford County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

REMNANTS OF HURRICANE IDA Sep 2021 · DR-4618
HURRICANE SANDY Jan 2013 · DR-4099
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3356

Drought

D1 — moderate drought

Bedford County is in D1 (moderate drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years16 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years10.7%

06How Saxton compares

Scores for nearby Pennsylvania cities on one line, with the average marked.

Mcmurray
86.8 · A-
Philadelphia
79.8 · B
Greensburg
46.7 · D
Pittsburgh
44 · F
Saxton (this city)
42 · F
Bryn Mawr
34.2 · F

dashed line = Pennsylvania average (49/100)

Saxton scores 42/100below the Pennsylvania average of 49/100. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. Full Pennsylvania rankings →

Bedford water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Saxton's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 6.0 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Saxton alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Saxton, PA tap water safe to drink?

Saxton's water quality earned a grade of F (42/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #432 out of 559 cities tested in Pennsylvania.

What contaminants are in Saxton's water?

Lead was measured at 6.0 ppb (90th percentile). 258 violations are on record.

How is Saxton's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Saxton?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Saxton's water come from?

Saxton's water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 1,675 residents.

What health violations has Saxton's water system had?

Saxton has 5 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in January 2026. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 29 violations remain unresolved.

How does Saxton's water compare to other cities?

Saxton ranks #432 out of 559 cities in Pennsylvania (better than 23% of state cities) and #14583 out of 15382 cities nationally (5th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does Saxton's small water system affect quality?

Saxton's system serves approximately 1,675 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 258 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Saxton, PA: Saxton is a borough in Bedford County, Pennsylvania, United States. The population was 726 at the 2020 census. Median household income $36,250 · median home value $112,741 · median age 43.9 · 56.4% homeowners · 20.1% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Bedford.
Show ZIP codes 16678
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.