Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Patuxent River, MD Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A- — but Chlorate was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
-2.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
2 unresolved violations
22K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MD0180022 · high data confidence · federal utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
A 86.7 / 100

#23 of 107Maryland cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Patuxent River water safe?

Patuxent River's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of A- (86.7/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 22,000 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Chlorate is over its legal limit

Measured at 994.0 µg/L against the EPA Lifetime HA of 210 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is -2.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 19.7000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Patuxent River's drinking water received a grade of A- (86.7 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 22,000 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at -2.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 58 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

Patuxent River ranks #23 out of 107 cities in Maryland for water quality, placing it above average in the state. Patuxent River relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.09 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

How the 86.7/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
38.9 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at -2.0 ppb (90th percentile).
19 / 20A
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
13.8 / 20C
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Patuxent River's water

Every contaminant flagged in Patuxent River, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

9 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
19.7000 µg/L 120% of limit
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
994.0 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
19.7 µg/L 33% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
10.0 µg/L 20% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
192.0 µg/L 13% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
1.50 µg/L 4% of limit
38 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 9 detected Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) -2.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 19.700 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Patuxent River's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 58 violations on record, including 2 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

13 monitoring & paperwork 1 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Patuxent River's water quality assessment. Grade: A- (86.7/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: TTHM.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Nitrate.Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 0 ppb1993 — 1 ppb1994 — 0 ppb1995 — 2 ppb1998 — 0 ppb1999 — 0 ppb2002 — 9 ppb2005 — 3 ppb2006 — 0 ppb2009 — 0 ppb2012 — 3 ppb2013 — 0 ppb2016 — -2 ppb-219921995200220092016

Down 2 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: -2 ppb (2016) — -13% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Patuxent River's water comes from

Patuxent River's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under federal ownership.

Delivery

22,000 people

Residents served across Patuxent River's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by federal ownership and serves approximately 22,000 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
PATUXENT NAVAL AIR STATION (NAVFAC-WASH) MD0180022 22,000 Groundwater

05Pressure on Patuxent River's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Drought

D3 — extreme drought

Saint Mary's County is in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity13 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years13 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years10.4%

06How Patuxent River compares

Scores for nearby Maryland cities on one line, with the average marked.

Laurel
95 · A+
Patuxent River (this city)
86.7 · A-
Columbia
66 · C+
Millersville
41.6 · F
Baltimore
39.8 · F
Frederick
37.5 · F

dashed line = Maryland average (60/100)

Patuxent River scores 86.7/100above the Maryland average of 60/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full Maryland rankings →

St. Mary'S water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Patuxent River's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Patuxent River alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Patuxent River, MD tap water safe to drink?

Patuxent River's water quality earned a grade of A- (86.7/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #23 out of 107 cities tested in Maryland.

What contaminants are in Patuxent River's water?

Lead was measured at -2.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 58 violations are on record.

How is Patuxent River's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Patuxent River?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Patuxent River's water come from?

Patuxent River's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 22,000 residents.

What health violations has Patuxent River's water system had?

Patuxent River has 2 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in June 2023. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 2 violations remain unresolved.

Is Patuxent River's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Patuxent River uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 58 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Patuxent River's water compare to other cities?

Patuxent River ranks #23 out of 107 cities in Maryland (better than 79% of state cities) and #4462 out of 15382 cities nationally (71th percentile). The grade of A- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Patuxent River, MD: The Patuxent River is a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay in the state of Maryland. There are three main river drainages for central Maryland: the Potomac River to the west passing through Washington, D.C., the Patapsco River to the northeast passing through Baltimore, and the Patuxent River between the two. The 908-square-mile (2,352 km2) Patuxent watershed had a rapidly growing population of 590,769 in 2000. It is the largest and longest river entirely within Maryland, and its watershed is the largest completely within the state. Wikipedia → Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.