Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Palmer, AK Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
7.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile
192 unresolved violations
10K people served by 31 water systems

PWSID AK2226020 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
F 41 / 100

#70 of 73Alaska cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Palmer water safe?

Palmer's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (41/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 31 water systems serve approximately 10,474 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 2.20 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

No forever chemicals detected

UCMR 5 laboratory testing found no PFAS compounds above detection thresholds in this system.

See PFAS results ↓
Keep watching

214 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Palmer's drinking water received a grade of F (41 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 31 water systems serve approximately 10,474 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 1759 violations on record, including 58 health-based violations. 192 remain unresolved.

Palmer ranks #70 out of 73 cities in Alaska for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Palmer relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. The system has seen 214 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 41/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile).
12 / 20C
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
16 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Palmer's water

Every contaminant flagged in Palmer, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

2 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
32 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 2 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 7.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 2.20 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Palmer's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 1759 violations on record, including 58 health-based violations. 192 remain unresolved.

1 of the last ten years was clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

20 health-based in 10 yrs 294 monitoring & paperwork 57 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Palmer's water quality assessment. Grade: F (41/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation3 drinking water violations recorded2 health-based. Contaminants: Groundwater Rule, Arsenic, Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
050010001500EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 10 ppb1994 — 7 ppb1995 — 5.5 ppb1996 — 7.5 ppb1997 — 8.1 ppb1998 — 5 ppb1999 — 1100 ppb2000 — 790 ppb2001 — 4.7 ppb2002 — 4.4 ppb2003 — 8.5 ppb2004 — 6.5 ppb2005 — 3.1 ppb2006 — 9.3 ppb2007 — 5.3 ppb2008 — 3.9 ppb2009 — 1.5 ppb2010 — 1.2 ppb2011 — 1.2 ppb2012 — 9.1 ppb2013 — 2.7 ppb2014 — 1.7 ppb2015 — 6.6 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2017 — 1.6 ppb2018 — 2.5 ppb2019 — 2.3 ppb2020 — 6.2 ppb2021 — 1.3 ppb2022 — 0.94 ppb2023 — 9 ppb2024 — 4.6 ppb2025 — 0 ppb2027 — 0 ppb100199320002007201420212027

Down 10 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2027) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
02468EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1994 — 3.2 mg/L1995 — 5.7 mg/L1996 — 5.1 mg/L2003 — 1.5 mg/L2022 — 1.8 mg/L2023 — 2.1 mg/L2025 — 2.2 mg/L3.22.21994199620222025

Down 1 mg/L since 1994. The latest reading (2.2 mg/L, 2025) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Palmer's water comes from

Palmer's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

31 systems

31 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

10,474 people

Residents served across Palmer's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 10,474 people through 31 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
PALMER WATER SYSTEM AK2226020 8,111 Groundwater
EQUESTRIAN ACRES AK2227199 950 Groundwater
UNIFIED ALASKAN UTILITIES MIDTOWN EST AK2227204 495 Groundwater
PIONEER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AK2227734 435 Groundwater
RIVER BEND SUBDIVISION AK2226035 320 Groundwater
BELLA VISTA SUBDIVISION AK2220439 266 Groundwater
SILVER CREEK SPRINGS SD AK2220070 239 Groundwater
MAJESTIC HILLS SUBDIVISION AK2226021 168 Groundwater
BIRCH RUN ESTATES AK2220173 167 Groundwater
VIEW POINTE AT THE RANCH AK2220485 155 Groundwater
MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTATES AK2226509 150 Groundwater
UNIFIED ALASKAN UTILITIES-FIELD OF VIEW AK2220135 135 Groundwater
HILL TIMBER ESTATES AK2223983 120 Groundwater
ELSINORE ESTATES SUBDIVISION AK2224036 120 Groundwater
CRIMSON VIEW S/D WATER ASSN. AK2224329 118 Groundwater
VICTORY BIBLE CAMP SPRING AK2226567 110 Groundwater
ARKOSE WOODS AK2226057 90 Groundwater
PALMER CORRECTIONAL CENTER AK2226240 90 Groundwater
HEAVENLY MEADOWS AK2226014 88 Groundwater
SHEENA MAY ESTATES AK2224337 74 Groundwater
NORTH STAR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM AK2220086 55 Groundwater
SHOOTING STAR CIRCLE AK2220095 52 Groundwater
ALPINE VIEW SUBDIVISION AK2220488 50 Groundwater
IRIS CIRCLE WATER CORPORATION AK2226410 37 Groundwater
TWIN PEAKS AK2227539 37 Groundwater
MATANUSKA HEIGHTS DUCHESS AK2227547 36 Groundwater
VIOLET CIRCLE WATER COMPANY AK2226428 35 Groundwater
CAMWELL ON THE GREEN (MHP) AK2227220 33 Groundwater
MOUNTAIN GLORY SUBDIVISION AK2226051 32 Groundwater
WILDROSE CIRCLE AK2227149 30 Groundwater
HERITAGE PARK AK2227212 30 Groundwater

Water bodies near Palmer

Knik R Nr Palmer · river Moose C Nr Palmer · river Matanuska R · river L Susitna R Nr Palmer · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Palmer's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

1 facility within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

CROWLEY PALMER FACILITY 0 lb · 0.8 mi

06How Palmer compares

Scores for nearby Alaska cities on one line, with the average marked.

Juneau
65.4 · C+
Wasilla
42.5 · F
Palmer (this city)
41 · F
Anchorage
38.5 · F
Fairbanks
38.4 · F

dashed line = Alaska average (61/100)

Palmer scores 41/100below the Alaska average of 61/100. It outscores 2 of 10 nearby cities. Full Alaska rankings →

Matanuska-Susitna Borough water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Palmer's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 7.0 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Palmer alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Palmer, AK tap water safe to drink?

Palmer's water quality earned a grade of F (41/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #70 out of 73 cities tested in Alaska.

What contaminants are in Palmer's water?

Lead was measured at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 1759 violations are on record.

How is Palmer's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Palmer?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Palmer's water come from?

Palmer's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 31 water systems serving approximately 10,474 residents.

What health violations has Palmer's water system had?

Palmer has 58 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in December 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 192 violations remain unresolved.

Is Palmer's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Palmer uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 1759 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Palmer's water compare to other cities?

Palmer ranks #70 out of 73 cities in Alaska (better than 4% of state cities) and #14722 out of 15382 cities nationally (4th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Palmer, AK: Palmer is a city in and the borough seat of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska, United States, located 42 miles (68 km) northeast of Anchorage on the Glenn Highway in the Matanuska Valley. It is the ninth-largest city in Alaska, and forms part of the Anchorage metropolitan statistical area. As of the 2020 census, the population of the city is 5,888, down from 5,937 in 2010. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Matanuska-Susitna Borough.
Show ZIP codes 99645
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.