WaterVerge

Is North, SC Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+ — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

4K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: SC3820001
Overall Score
80.7 / 100
Violations
10 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#137 of 196 in South Carolina Top 49% nationally
Local Government
Moderate data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
B+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
80.7/100
waterverge.com
B+ 80.7/100

North, SC — Water Quality Report

North's drinking water received a grade of B+ (80.7 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,728 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 5.7 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program.

The system has 21 violations on record, including 10 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about North's water

North ranks #137 out of 196 cities in South Carolina for water quality, placing it below average in the state.

North relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
80.7 out of 100 Grade B+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
41.7/45
A
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
14/20
C
Lead at 5.7 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
17/20
B
PFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
Compliance
3/10
F
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is North, SC water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

North's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (80.7/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,728 residents using groundwater (wells).

10
Active Violations
5.7 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for North

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into North's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (80.7/100).

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4858). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE HELENE

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4829). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: E. COLI.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for North's water supply.

Lead Elevated
Detected: 5.7 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Within EPA limits but above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended level of 1 ppb. An NSF 53-certified filter provides additional protection.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 1.60 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

Violation history

North's water system has 21 total violations on record, including 10 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

MRMCLOtherTT
Most recent violations:
Jul 2013 E. COLI Open
Jun 2013 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
May 2011 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
Jul 2010 Combined Radium (-226 and -228) Resolved
Jun 2009 Coliform (TCR) Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Orangeburg County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2017. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Sunnyside Canal, North Fork Edisto River.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4858
HURRICANE HELENE
Hurricane FEMA DR-4829
HURRICANE IDALIA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3597

Where does North's water come from?

North's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 3,728 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Sunnyside Canal (river), North Fork Edisto River (river).

What North residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in North's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Monitor alerts during storms

North's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
5.7 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 38% of limit
Safe Level
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
1.60 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +20% over limit
Exceeds Limit
Compliance Record

Violation summary

21
Total violations
10
Health-based
10
Active / unresolved
Jul 2013
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

21 Total
10 Active
10 Health-based
11 Resolved
Violations by category
Lead and Copper Rule
8
Total Coliform Rule
6
Radionuclides and Revised Rad Rule
3
Ground Water Rule
1
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
1
Jul 2013 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Apr 2008 Active
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2005 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 1998 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 1998 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 1998 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 1997 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jul 1994 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 1994 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Jun 2013 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jun 2013
May 2011 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved May 2011
Jul 2010 Resolved
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2010
Jun 2009 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2009
Sep 2007 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2007
Aug 2007 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Aug 2007
Jan 2007 Resolved
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2007
Jan 2005 Resolved
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2005
Oct 2004 Resolved
Combined Radium (-226 and -228)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 2004
Feb 1999 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Feb 1999
Showing 20 of 21 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of North

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near North, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEMS
Fabricated Metals · NUCOR CORP
SWANSEA, SC29160
7.2 mi
TANNER INDUSTRIES INC.
Chemical Wholesalers · TANNER INDUSTRIES INC
SWANSEA, SC29160
7.3 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D3 — extreme drought

Orangeburg County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
16.3%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Jan 2025
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Orangeburg County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2017. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Jan 2025
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4858
Sep 2024
HURRICANE HELENE
Hurricane FEMA #4829
Aug 2023
HURRICANE IDALIA
Hurricane FEMA #3597
Nov 2022
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA #4677
Sep 2022
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA #3585
Sep 2019
HURRICANE DORIAN
Hurricane FEMA #3421

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in North's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead detected at 5.7 ppb
Read our guide →
🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 5.7 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.60 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 0.3 ppb from 1994 (6.0 ppb) to 2025 (5.7 ppb).

Copper level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
Copper has decreased by 4.000 mg/L from 1994 (5.600 mg/L) to 2025 (1.600 mg/L).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
3,728
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where North's water comes from

Groundwater

North's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,728 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near North

North is located near 2 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Sunnyside Canal
river
North Fork Edisto River
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving North

System Name PWSID Population Source
BULL SWAMP RURAL WTR CO (SC3820001) SC3820001 2,350 GW
NORTH TOWN OF (SC3810010) SC3810010 1,378 GW
Regional Comparison

North's score of 80.7/100 is on par with the average of 77/100 among major South Carolina cities. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. 6 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

North (this city)
80.7
Greenville
92.1
Charleston
82.8
Columbia
37.1
Conway
67.5
Okatie
83.8
South Carolina avg
77
City Profile

About North, SC

Wikipedia →

Orangeburg is the principal city in and the county seat of Orangeburg County, South Carolina, United States. The population of the city was 13,964 according to the 2020 census. The city is located 37 miles southeast of Columbia, on the north fork of the Edisto River.

Economic Profile
$40,069
Median Income
$594/mo
Median Rent
7.7%
Unemployment
Community
45.9
Median Age
409
People / sq mi
6.1%
College Educated
60.8%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is North, SC tap water safe to drink?

North's water quality earned a grade of B+ (80.7/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #137 out of 196 cities tested in South Carolina.

What contaminants are in North's water?

Lead was measured at 5.7 ppb (90th percentile). 21 violations are on record.

How is North's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in North?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does North's water come from?

North's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 3,728 residents.

What health violations has North's water system had?

North has 10 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2013. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 10 violations remain unresolved.

Is North's groundwater at risk of contamination?

North uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 21 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does North's water compare to other cities?

North ranks #137 out of 196 cities in South Carolina (better than 30% of state cities) and #7750 out of 15744 cities nationally (51th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.