WaterVerge

Is North Charleston, SC Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B — but PFOS and Chlorate were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

26K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: SC1820008
Overall Score
76.2 / 100
Violations
10 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Purchased surface water
#157 of 196 in South Carolina Top 60% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
BGRADE
Water Quality Grade
76.2/100
waterverge.com
B 76.2/100

North Charleston, SC — Water Quality Report

North Charleston's drinking water received a grade of B (76.2 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 26,209 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 7.9 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. UCMR 5 testing detected 5 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply.

The system has 18 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about North Charleston's water

North Charleston ranks #157 out of 196 cities in South Carolina for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state.

The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection.

Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.07 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
76.2 out of 100 Grade B
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
41.4/45
A
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 7.9 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
11.8/20
D
5 PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
3/10
F
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
4/5
B
Water source: Purchased surface water.
Water Safety

Is North Charleston, SC water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

North Charleston's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B (76.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 26,209 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

10
Active Violations
7.9 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
5 compounds
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for North Charleston

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

PFAS
5 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detected

PFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into North Charleston's water quality assessment. Grade: B (76.2/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.

Disaster
HURRICANE IDALIA

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3597). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE IAN

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4677). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for North Charleston's water supply.

Lead Elevated
Detected: 7.9 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Within EPA limits but above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended level of 1 ppb. An NSF 53-certified filter provides additional protection.

PFAS (5 compounds) Exceeds Limit
Detected: Highest: PFOS at 0.0055 µg/L Limit: 0.004 µg/L (EPA MCL)

PFAS "forever chemicals" exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon filtration strongly recommended.

PFAS "forever chemicals" detected

UCMR 5 testing found 5 PFAS compounds in North Charleston's water supply. PFAS are synthetic chemicals that persist indefinitely in the environment and the human body.

Compound Level EPA MCL Status
PFOS 0.0055 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL
PFPeA 0.0048 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit
PFOA 0.0043 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Over MCL
PFHxA 0.0042 µg/L 0.004 µg/L Within Limit

Violation history

North Charleston's water system has 18 total violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 10 remain unresolved. 3 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

RPTMROther
Most recent violations:
Oct 2024 LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS Open
Oct 2022 Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Resolved
Oct 2022 TTHM Resolved
Oct 2010 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
Jul 2007 Consumer Confidence Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Dorchester County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2016. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Ashley River, Sawmill Branch, Ashley River Below Summerville.

HURRICANE IDALIA
Hurricane FEMA DR-3597
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA DR-4677
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA DR-3585

Where does North Charleston's water come from?

North Charleston's drinking water comes from surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 26,209 people. Surface water sources are more susceptible to contamination from runoff, industrial discharge, and algal blooms, requiring extensive treatment. Nearby water bodies include Ashley River (stream), Sawmill Branch (river), Ashley River Below Summerville (stream).

What North Charleston residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: Reverse osmosis system. This addresses the specific contaminants found in North Charleston's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Monitor alerts during storms

North Charleston's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
7.9 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 53% of limit
Safe Level
PFOS
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Over MCL
0.0055 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Exceeds MCL
PFPeA
PFAS / Forever Chemical
Near MCL
0.0048 µg/L
EPA MCL: 0.004 µg/L · +20% over limit
Detected
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
14.0 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 23% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 6.6 µg/LHAA9: 19.6 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.07 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 1% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
64.0 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 4% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
1,4-Dioxane
Organic
Elevated
0.33 µg/L
EPA Health Advisory: 0.35 µg/L · 94% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Detected
11.4 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 23% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
Vanadium
Inorganic
Detected
1.10 µg/L
EPA Short-term HA: 21 µg/L · 5% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
280.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
5
Detected
2
Exceed EPA MCL
2.45
Hazard Index
PFOS max: 0.0055 µg/L PFOA max: 0.0043 µg/L
Compliance Record

Violation summary

18
Total violations
0
Health-based
10
Active / unresolved
Oct 2024
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

18 Total
10 Active
0 Health-based
8 Resolved
Violations by category
Total Coliform Rule
5
Consumer Confidence Rule
5
Lead and Copper Rule
3
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
2
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions
1
Oct 2024 Active
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2007 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2005 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2004 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2003 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2002 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2001 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Oct 2000 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Oct 1996 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Oct 2022 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2022
Oct 2022 Resolved
TTHM
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2022
Oct 2010 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Oct 2010
Jan 2007 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jan 2007
Feb 2002 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Feb 2002
Sep 1999 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1999
Sep 1999 Resolved
Surface Water Treatment Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 1999
Jun 1992 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jun 1992
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of North Charleston

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near North Charleston, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 33,663 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
KAPSTONE PAPER & PACKAGING CORP
Paper · WESTROCK CO
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC29406
Manganese compounds21,0565.5 mi
DCL - BUSHY PARK FACILITY
Chemicals · DCL CORP
GOOSE CREEK, SC29445
Methanol12,3318.8 mi
GS II INC.
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · SAINT-GOBAIN CORP
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC29405
Formaldehyde1206.2 mi
EVERRIS NA INC
Chemicals · ICL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC29418
Manganese compounds940.3 mi
DETYENS SHIPYARD
Transportation Equipment · DETYENS SHIPYARD
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC29405
Copper616.3 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Site context

Superfund sites within 10 miles of North Charleston

Superfund sites nearby

Federally tracked hazardous-waste sites on the EPA National Priorities List. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

Source: EPA Superfund National Priorities List

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D3 — extreme drought

Dorchester County is currently in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
12.2%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Aug 2023
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Dorchester County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 2016. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Aug 2023
HURRICANE IDALIA
Hurricane FEMA #3597
Nov 2022
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA #4677
Sep 2022
HURRICANE IAN
Hurricane FEMA #3585
Sep 2019
HURRICANE DORIAN
Hurricane FEMA #4464
Sep 2019
HURRICANE DORIAN
Hurricane FEMA #3421
Sep 2018
HURRICANE FLORENCE
Hurricane FEMA #4394

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in North Charleston's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead detected at 7.9 ppb
Read our guide →
🧪
For PFAS
Reverse Osmosis or Activated Carbon Block
PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 7.9 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.004 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.005 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.005 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 1.9 ppb from 1993 (6.0 ppb) to 2025 (7.9 ppb).
Contaminant Rankings

See how North Charleston compares by contaminant

Explore where North Charleston ranks among all South Carolina cities for specific contaminants.

Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Purchased Surface Water
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
26,209
Water Systems
2
Source breakdown
Purchased Surface Water
1
Groundwater
1
Water Source

Where North Charleston's water comes from

Purchased Surface Water

North Charleston's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards.

These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 26,209 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near North Charleston

North Charleston is located near 3 notable water bodies. As a surface water system, these water bodies may directly influence the city's drinking water supply.

Ashley River
stream
Sawmill Branch
river
Ashley River Below Summerville
stream
Infrastructure

Water systems serving North Charleston

System Name PWSID Population Source
DCWS ASHLEY PHOSPHATE (SC1820008) SC1820008 26,076 SWP
CEDARWOOD ACRES MOBILE HOME PARK GA0310173 133 GW
Regional Comparison

How North Charleston compares

Full South Carolina rankings →

North Charleston's score of 76.2/100 is on par with the average of 77/100 among major South Carolina cities. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. 6 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

North Charleston (this city)
76.2
Greenville
92.1
Charleston
82.8
Columbia
37.1
Conway
67.5
Okatie
83.8
South Carolina avg
77
City Profile

About North Charleston, SC

Wikipedia →

Summerville is a town in the U.S. state of South Carolina situated mostly in Dorchester County, with small portions in Berkeley and Charleston counties. It lies approximately five miles from the Ashley River. The population was 50,915 at the 2020 census, making it the seventh-most populous city in South Carolina. It is part of the Charleston metropolitan area.

Economic Profile
$58,534
Median Income
$238,898
Median Home Value
$1,288/mo
Median Rent
4.3%
Unemployment
Community
33.8
Median Age
576
People / sq mi
26.7%
College Educated
49.4%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is North Charleston, SC tap water safe to drink?

North Charleston's water quality earned a grade of B (76.2/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #157 out of 196 cities tested in South Carolina.

What contaminants are in North Charleston's water?

Lead was measured at 7.9 ppb (90th percentile). 5 PFAS compounds were detected. 18 violations are on record.

How is North Charleston's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in North Charleston?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does North Charleston's water come from?

North Charleston's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 26,209 residents.

Why does North Charleston have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

5 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in North Charleston's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does North Charleston's water compare to other cities?

North Charleston ranks #157 out of 196 cities in South Carolina (better than 20% of state cities) and #9355 out of 15744 cities nationally (41th percentile). The grade of B reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.