WaterVerge

Is New London, NH Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C+ — but Lead and Copper were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

3K residents served 3 water systems PWSID: NH1721010
Overall Score
65.7 / 100
Violations
7 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#61 of 119 in New Hampshire Top 73% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
C+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
65.7/100
waterverge.com
C+ 65.7/100

New London, NH — Water Quality Report

New London's drinking water received a grade of C+ (65.7 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 3,083 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 30.0 ppb (90th percentile), which exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals.

The system has 110 violations on record, including 29 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about New London's water

New London ranks #61 out of 119 cities in New Hampshire for water quality, placing it below average in the state.

New London relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

Lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb, which typically indicates aging lead service lines or lead solder in the distribution system. An NSF 53-certified filter is strongly recommended for drinking and cooking water.

As a small community water system, New London may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
65.7 out of 100 Grade C+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
35.7/45
B
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
1/20
F
Lead at 30.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
16/20
B
No PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is New London, NH water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

New London's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C+ (65.7/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 3,083 residents using groundwater (wells).

7
Active Violations
30.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
None
PFAS Detected
9 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for New London

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into New London's water quality assessment. Grade: C+ (65.7/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

1 health-based. Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Disaster
HURRICANE SANDY

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3360). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
TROPICAL STORM IRENE

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4026). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for New London's water supply.

Lead Exceeds Limit
Detected: 30.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Lead service line replacement and point-of-use filtration recommended.

Copper Exceeds Limit
Detected: 1.44 mg/L Limit: 1.3 mg/L (EPA Action Level)

Exceeds EPA action level. Copper can leach from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking.

Violation history

New London's water system has 110 total violations on record, including 29 health-based violations. 7 remain unresolved.

RPTMCLMROtherTT
Most recent violations:
Feb 2017 Revised Total Coliform Rule Open
Sep 2014 Coliform (TCR) Resolved
Jul 2011 TTHM Resolved
Jul 2011 Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Resolved
Jul 2010 Consumer Confidence Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Merrimack County has experienced 9 federally declared disasters since 1973. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11,.

HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-3360
TROPICAL STORM IRENE
Hurricane FEMA DR-4026
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA DR-3333

Where does New London's water come from?

New London's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 3 water systems serving approximately 3,083 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11, (river).

What New London residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF 53-certified pitcher or under-sink filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in New London's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Monitor alerts during storms

New London's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Over Limit
30.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · +20% over limit
Exceeds LimitFilter: NSF-53
Copper (90th percentile)
Inorganic
Over Limit
1.44 mg/L
EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L · +11% over limit
Exceeds Limit
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
0
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

110
Total violations
29
Health-based
7
Active / unresolved
Feb 2017
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

110 Total
7 Active
29 Health-based
103 Resolved
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
42
Total Coliform Rule
27
Inorganic Chemicals
22
Nitrate Rule
5
Consumer Confidence Rule
3
Feb 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jul 2010 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Sep 2008 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Oct 2006 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2006 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Sep 2014 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2014
Jul 2011 Resolved
TTHM
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Oct 2011
Jul 2011 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Oct 2011
Nov 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Nov 2008
Nov 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Nov 2008
Aug 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Aug 2008
Aug 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Aug 2008
Jul 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jul 2008
Sep 2007 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2007
Apr 2004 Resolved
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Jun 2004
Jan 2004 Resolved
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Mar 2004
Oct 2003 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Oct 2003
Sep 2003 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Max Contaminant Level
Health-Based Health Resolved Sep 2003
Showing 20 of 110 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of New London

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near New London, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 3 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
STURM RUGER & CO. INC.
Fabricated Metals · STURM RUGER & CO INC
NEWPORT, NH03773
Chromium38.6 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Merrimack County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
5.6%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

9
Declared disasters
Oct 2012
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Merrimack County has experienced 9 federally declared disasters since 1973. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3360
Sep 2011
TROPICAL STORM IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #4026
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #3333
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3258
Oct 1996
FALL NORTHEASTER RAINSTORM
Flood FEMA #1144
Jan 1996
EXCESSIVE RAINFALL, HIGH WINDS, AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #1077

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in New London's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead level (30.0 ppb) exceeds the EPA action level of 15 ppb
Read our guide →
🔧
For Copper
Reverse Osmosis or KDF Filter
Copper exceeds the EPA action level of 1.3 mg/L

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 30.0 15 ppb Inorganic Over Limit
Copper (90th percentile) 1.44 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has increased by 4.0 ppb from 1997 (26.0 ppb) to 2010 (30.0 ppb).

Copper level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 1.3 mg/L
Copper has decreased by 0.030 mg/L from 1998 (1.470 mg/L) to 2002 (1.440 mg/L).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
3,083
Water Systems
3
Water Source

Where New London's water comes from

Groundwater

New London's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,083 people through 3 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near New London

New London is located near 1 notable water body. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11,
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving New London

System Name PWSID Population Source
NEW LONDON SPRINGFIELD WATER NH1721010 2,750 GW
SLOPE N SHORE CLUB NH1722020 180 GW
SEASONS AT LAKE SUNAPEE NH1722010 153 GW
Regional Comparison

How New London compares

Full New Hampshire rankings →

New London's score of 65.7/100 is on par with the average of 69/100 among major New Hampshire cities. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. 6 of 10 nearby cities score higher.

New London (this city)
65.7
Manchester
50.9
Nashua
88.7
Concord
51.3
Portsmouth
80.7
Keene
89.2
New Hampshire avg
69
City Profile

About New London, NH

Wikipedia →

New London is a town in Merrimack County, New Hampshire, United States. The population was 4,400 at the 2020 census. The town is the home of Colby–Sawyer College, site of the Gordon Research Conferences since 1947.

Economic Profile
$87,237
Median Income
$448,773
Median Home Value
$1,387/mo
Median Rent
2.4%
Unemployment
Community
52.2
Median Age
76
People / sq mi
62.5%
College Educated
90.8%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is New London, NH tap water safe to drink?

New London's water quality earned a grade of C+ (65.7/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #61 out of 119 cities tested in New Hampshire.

What contaminants are in New London's water?

Lead was measured at 30.0 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 110 violations are on record.

How is New London's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in New London?

Yes — lead levels exceed the EPA action level of 15 ppb. We recommend an NSF 53-certified filter or reverse osmosis system. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does New London's water come from?

New London's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 3,083 residents.

What health violations has New London's water system had?

New London has 29 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in February 2017. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 7 violations remain unresolved.

Is New London's groundwater at risk of contamination?

New London uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 110 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does New London's water compare to other cities?

New London ranks #61 out of 119 cities in New Hampshire (better than 49% of state cities) and #11473 out of 15744 cities nationally (27th percentile). The grade of C+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.