Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Moscow, TN Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B-, with 5 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
11.1 ppb lead, 90th percentile
5 unresolved violations
821 people served by 1 water system

PWSID TN0000477 · moderate data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 74.8 / 100

#251 of 299Tennessee cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Moscow water safe?

Moscow's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B- (74.8/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 821 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

5 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
Context

821 people, 1 system

All figures on this page come from federal EPA compliance and testing data for the systems serving this city.

See the systems ↓
Keep watching

Lead is approaching its limit

Measured at 11.1 ppb — 74% of the 15 ppb limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Moscow's drinking water received a grade of B- (74.8 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 821 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 11.1 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 41 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. 5 remain unresolved.

Moscow ranks #251 out of 299 cities in Tennessee for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Moscow relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. As a small community water system, Moscow may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities. The system has seen 18 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 74.8/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
31.8 / 45C
Lead & CopperLead at 11.1 ppb (90th percentile).
13 / 20C
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
17 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Moscow's water

Every contaminant flagged in Moscow, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Near Limit — EPA Action Level: 15 ppb

Within EPA limits but above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended level of 1 ppb — no lead level is considered safe for children. An NSF 53-certified filter provides additional protection, and running the cold tap 30 seconds after stagnation reduces exposure.
Near LimitFilter: NSF-53 What to do →
1 contaminant tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 11.1 15 ppb Inorganic Near Limit
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Moscow's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 41 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. 5 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

18 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Moscow's water quality assessment. Grade: B- (74.8/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Diquat, Endothall.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATIONFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3217). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterSEVERE STORMS & FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-459). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 8 ppb1994 — 7 ppb2004 — 10 ppb2007 — 7 ppb2010 — 1.2 ppb2013 — 0.50 ppb2016 — 0.50 ppb2019 — 0.50 ppb2022 — 1 ppb2025 — 11 ppb811199320042010201620222025

Up 3.1 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 11 ppb (2025) — 74% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Moscow's water comes from

Moscow's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

821 people

Residents served across Moscow's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 821 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
MOSCOW WATER DEPT TN0000477 821 Groundwater

Water bodies near Moscow

Hatchie River Nr Walnut · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Moscow's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

2 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

STABILIT AMERICA INC. 0 lb · 0.4 mi
THE EGGO CO 0 lb · 9.6 mi

Flood & storm history

Occasional

2 federal disaster declarations on record for Hardeman County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3217
SEVERE STORMS & FLOODING Mar 1975 · DR-459

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Moscow compares

Scores for nearby Tennessee cities on one line, with the average marked.

Murfreesboro
80.6 · B+
Clarksville
75.5 · B
Moscow (this city)
74.8 · B-
Nashville
69 · C+
Memphis
66.2 · C+
Knoxville
55 · C-

dashed line = Tennessee average (73/100)

Moscow scores 74.8/100on par with the Tennessee average of 73/100. It outscores 5 of 10 nearby cities. Full Tennessee rankings →

Fayette water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Moscow's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 11.1 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Moscow alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Moscow, TN tap water safe to drink?

Moscow's water quality earned a grade of B- (74.8/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #251 out of 299 cities tested in Tennessee.

What contaminants are in Moscow's water?

Lead was measured at 11.1 ppb (90th percentile). 41 violations are on record.

How is Moscow's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Moscow?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Moscow's water come from?

Moscow's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 821 residents.

What health violations has Moscow's water system had?

Moscow has 1 health-based violation on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 5 violations remain unresolved.

Is Moscow's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Moscow uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 41 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Moscow's water compare to other cities?

Moscow ranks #251 out of 299 cities in Tennessee (better than 16% of state cities) and #9637 out of 15382 cities nationally (37th percentile). The grade of B- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Does Moscow's small water system affect quality?

Moscow's system serves approximately 821 residents. Small community water systems (under 3,300 people) may have fewer financial resources for infrastructure upgrades and advanced treatment technologies. However, they are held to the same EPA drinking water standards as larger systems. This system has 41 violations on record.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Moscow, TN: Middleton is a city in Hardeman County, Tennessee, United States. As of the 2020 census, Middleton had a population of 658. It is located at the intersection of Tennessee State Route 125 and Tennessee State Route 57. Its slogan is the "Crossroads of the South". Median household income $42,885 · median home value $134,693 · median age 33.9 · 51.6% homeowners · 15.2% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Fayette.
Show ZIP codes 38057
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.