Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Kearney, NE Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded C+ — but Copper and Chlorate were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
22 unresolved violations
35K people served by 8 water systems

PWSID NE3101906 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
C 70 / 100

#182 of 196Nebraska cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Kearney water safe?

Kearney's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of C+ (70/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 8 water systems serve approximately 34,989 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.78 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 38.7000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Kearney's drinking water received a grade of C+ (70 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 8 water systems serve approximately 34,989 residents using ground water under influence.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 94 violations on record, including 45 health-based violations. 22 remain unresolved.

Kearney ranks #182 out of 196 cities in Nebraska for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Kearney relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 3.50 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

How the 70/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
28.4 / 45C
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
17.1 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
5 / 10D
Source RiskWater source: Ground water under influence.
3.5 / 5C

02What's in Kearney's water

Every contaminant flagged in Kearney, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

11 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
38.7000 µg/L 120% of limit
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
390.0 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
38.7 µg/L 65% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
810.0 µg/L 54% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
11.00 µg/L 52% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
15.4 µg/L 31% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
5.50 µg/L 14% of limit
40 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 11 detected Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.78 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 38.700 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Kearney's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 94 violations on record, including 45 health-based violations. 22 remain unresolved.

6 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

1 health-based in 10 yrs 4 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Kearney's water quality assessment. Grade: C+ (70/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.Resolved
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4420). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb2000 — 3 ppb2001 — 7 ppb2004 — 3 ppb2007 — 2.3 ppb2010 — 2.4 ppb2012 — 0.60 ppb2013 — 2.9 ppb2014 — 0 ppb2015 — 0.50 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2017 — 3.3 ppb2018 — 0 ppb2019 — 1.1 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 0 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2023 — 0 ppb2024 — 0 ppb2025 — 0 ppb30200020102015201920232025

Down 3 ppb since 2000. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2025) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
00.5011.522.5EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1992 — 1.5 mg/L2010 — 1.8 mg/L1.51.819922010

Up 0.28 mg/L since 1992. The latest reading (1.8 mg/L, 2010) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Kearney's water comes from

Kearney's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Ground Water Under Influence

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

8 systems

8 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

34,989 people

Residents served across Kearney's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 34,989 people through 8 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
KEARNEY, CITY OF NE3101906 34,000 Ground Water Under Influence
BUFFALO CO SID 3 - GLENWOOD ESTATES NE3120037 400 Groundwater
SUNSET VIEW MOBILE HOME PARK NE3101904 200 Groundwater
RIVERSIDE MOBILE HOME PARK NE3101914 122 Groundwater
WEST SIDE TRAILER COURT NE3121406 100 Groundwater
CLEARVIEW UTILITIES CORP NE3120029 69 Groundwater
1733 ESTATES ASSOCIATES NE3120018 50 Groundwater
WOOD RIVER VALLEY MOBILE HOME PARK NE3101905 48 Groundwater

Water bodies near Kearney

Platte River Near Kearney, Nebr. · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Kearney's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

GIBBON PACKING LLC 0 lb · 9.8 mi
THE ANDERSONS INC. - GIBBON 0 lb · 9.1 mi
CHIEF INDUSTRIES INC - AGRI/INDUSTRIAL DIV 0 lb · 2.2 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

5 federal disaster declarations on record for Buffalo County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE WINTER STORM, STRAIGHT-LINE WINDS, AND FLOODING Mar 2019 · DR-4420
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUEES Sep 2005 · DR-3245
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Jul 1993 · DR-998

Drought

D2 — severe drought

Buffalo County is in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity19 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years19 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years16.3%

06How Kearney compares

Scores for nearby Nebraska cities on one line, with the average marked.

Grand Island
78.6 · B
Kearney (this city)
70 · C+
Papillion
68 · C+
Fremont
67 · C+
Omaha
56.5 · C-
Lincoln
56.5 · C-

dashed line = Nebraska average (67/100)

Kearney scores 70/100on par with the Nebraska average of 67/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Nebraska rankings →

Buffalo water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Kearney's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Kearney alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Kearney, NE tap water safe to drink?

Kearney's water quality earned a grade of C+ (70/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #182 out of 196 cities tested in Nebraska.

What contaminants are in Kearney's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 94 violations are on record.

How is Kearney's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Kearney?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Kearney's water come from?

Kearney's water is sourced from Ground water under influence. The city has 8 water systems serving approximately 34,989 residents.

What health violations has Kearney's water system had?

Kearney has 45 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in February 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 22 violations remain unresolved.

Is Kearney's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Kearney uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 94 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Kearney's water compare to other cities?

Kearney ranks #182 out of 196 cities in Nebraska (better than 7% of state cities) and #10662 out of 15382 cities nationally (31th percentile). The grade of C+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Kearney, NE: Median household income $66,843 · median home value $218,154 · median age 31.9 · 60.5% homeowners · 37.9% college educated. Service area: 4 ZIP codes across Buffalo.
Show ZIP codes 68845688476884868849
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.