Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Jackson, WY Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded F — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
2.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
90 unresolved violations
27K people served by 26 water systems

PWSID WY5600213 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
F 43.2 / 100

#56 of 63Wyoming cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Jackson water safe?

Jackson's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of F (43.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 26 water systems serve approximately 26,788 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.39 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 2.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 26.0000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Jackson's drinking water received a grade of F (43.2 out of 100), indicating failing water quality. The city's 26 water systems serve approximately 26,788 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 2 PFAS compounds in the water supply. The system has 1633 violations on record, including 64 health-based violations. 90 remain unresolved.

Jackson ranks #56 out of 63 cities in Wyoming for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. Jackson relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. The system has seen 129 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 43.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants2 PFAS compounds detected.
14.2 / 20C
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Jackson's water

Every contaminant flagged in Jackson, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
26.0000 µg/L 120% of limit

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
Lithium Inorganic
26.0 µg/L 43% of limit
33 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 5 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 2.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.39 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 26.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Jackson's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 1633 violations on record, including 64 health-based violations. 90 remain unresolved.

1 of the last ten years was clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

13 health-based in 10 yrs 236 monitoring & paperwork 35 still unresolved
PFAS2 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Jackson's water quality assessment. Grade: F (43.2/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Nitrate-Nitrite.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Chlorine.Resolved
Violation6 drinking water violations recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Nitrate-Nitrite, Combined Uranium, Radium-228.Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 17 ppb2001 — 3 ppb2002 — 10 ppb2003 — 1 ppb2004 — 10 ppb2005 — 0 ppb2006 — 2 ppb2007 — 0 ppb2008 — 12 ppb2009 — 5 ppb2010 — 5 ppb2011 — 8 ppb2012 — 4 ppb2013 — 3 ppb2014 — 3 ppb2015 — 3 ppb2016 — 6 ppb2017 — 6 ppb2018 — 4 ppb2019 — 5 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 1 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2023 — 2 ppb2024 — 2 ppb2025 — 0 ppb170199320062012201820242025

Down 17 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2025) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
01234EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L1993 — 1.6 mg/L1999 — 1.5 mg/L2000 — 1.5 mg/L2001 — 1.4 mg/L2002 — 1.5 mg/L2004 — 2.6 mg/L2005 — 1.6 mg/L2006 — 1.7 mg/L2007 — 1.5 mg/L2016 — 1.9 mg/L2018 — 1.4 mg/L2019 — 1.9 mg/L2020 — 1.8 mg/L2021 — 1.6 mg/L2022 — 2.0 mg/L2023 — 1.7 mg/L2024 — 1.8 mg/L2025 — 1.4 mg/L1.61.4199320022007202020242025

Down 0.23 mg/L since 1993. The latest reading (1.4 mg/L, 2025) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Jackson's water comes from

Jackson's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

26 systems

26 water systems (1 wholesaler), operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

26,788 people

Residents served across Jackson's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 26,788 people through 26 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
JACKSON, TOWN OF WY5600213 24,760 Groundwater
RAFTER J SUBDIVISION HOA WY5600822 1,500 Groundwater
ASPENS PINES W&S DISTRICT WY5600220 1,400 Groundwater
MELODY RANCH IMPROVEMENT & SERVICE DIST. WY5601440 900 Groundwater
SPRING CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WY5600811 400 Groundwater
SNAKE RIVER SPORTING CLUB WY5601699 332 Groundwater
BAR Y ESTATES/GROS VENTRE WEST WTR DISTS WY5600976 270 Groundwater
SKYLINE RANCH I&S DISTRICT WY5600217 260 Groundwater
GROS VENTRE UTILITY WY5600027 200 Groundwater
VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ID7410036 192 Groundwater
SQUAW CREEK WATER DISTRICT WY5600737 160 Groundwater
GROS VENTRE NORTH HOA WY5601357 160 Groundwater
EVANS MOBILE HOME COURT WY5600215 150 Groundwater
TETON SHADOWS HOA WY5600724 100 Groundwater
RIVERMEADOWS WATER DISTRICT WY5600786 100 Groundwater
VALLEY VIEW MUTUAL WATER COMPANY WY5601499 100 Groundwater
SNAKE RIVER MOBILE HOME PARK WY5600214 100 Ground Water Under Influence
RIVER MEADOWS ID7410048 90 Purchased Groundwater
HI-COUNTRY WATER DISTRICT WY5600216 85 Groundwater
SADDLE BUTTE WATER SYSTEM WY5601401 75 Purchased Groundwater
OLD WEST CABINS WY5601187 70 Groundwater
SOUTH PARK VILLAGE SUBDIVISION WY5600836 65 Groundwater
BAR-B-BAR MEADOWS WY5601439 55 Groundwater
J-W SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATION WY5600877 40 Groundwater
LITTLE HORSETHIEF CANYON HOA WY5601730 35 Groundwater
TETON SCIENCE SCHOOL-WILSON CAMPUS WY5601557 31 Groundwater

Water bodies near Jackson

Gros Ventre River · river Granite C Ab Granite C Supplemental, Nr Moose · river Fish Creek · river Cache Creek · river Flat Creek Below Cache Creek, · river

These water bodies shape the regional watershed and can indirectly affect groundwater quality.

05Pressure on Jackson's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Drought

D3 — extreme drought

Teton County is in D3 (extreme drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of Jul 2026). Drought can raise disinfection-byproduct levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

Current streak at D2+ severity15 wks
Weeks at D2+ in the last 5 years15 wks
Months in D2+ over the last 30 years22.9%

06How Jackson compares

Scores for nearby Wyoming cities on one line, with the average marked.

Rock Springs
64.8 · C
Laramie
55.2 · C-
Gillette
44.5 · F
Jackson (this city)
43.2 · F
Casper
41.8 · F
Cheyenne
30.8 · F

dashed line = Wyoming average (55/100)

Jackson scores 43.2/100below the Wyoming average of 55/100. It outscores 4 of 10 nearby cities. Full Wyoming rankings →

Teton water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Jackson's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 2 PFAS compounds detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Jackson alerts

We refresh EPA data monthly and surface new violations, advisories, and boil-water notices for your county on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Jackson, WY tap water safe to drink?

Jackson's water quality earned a grade of F (43.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #56 out of 63 cities tested in Wyoming.

What contaminants are in Jackson's water?

Lead was measured at 2.0 ppb (90th percentile). 2 PFAS compounds were detected. 1633 violations are on record.

How is Jackson's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Jackson?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Jackson's water come from?

Jackson's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 26 water systems serving approximately 26,788 residents.

What health violations has Jackson's water system had?

Jackson has 64 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 90 violations remain unresolved.

Is Jackson's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Jackson uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 1633 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Jackson's water compare to other cities?

Jackson ranks #56 out of 63 cities in Wyoming (better than 11% of state cities) and #14292 out of 15382 cities nationally (7th percentile). The grade of F reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Jackson, WY: Median household income $101,477 · median home value $920,855 · median age 34.5 · 46.9% homeowners · 54.6% college educated. Service area: 2 ZIP codes across Teton.
Show ZIP codes 8300183002
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.