Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Gray, GA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D+ — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
34 unresolved violations
23K people served by 6 water systems

PWSID GA1690002 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 51.2 / 100

#309 of 372Georgia cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Gray water safe?

Gray's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D+ (51.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 6 water systems serve approximately 22,909 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.41 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 16.7000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Gray's drinking water received a grade of D+ (51.2 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 6 water systems serve approximately 22,909 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 7 PFAS compounds, with levels exceeding EPA maximum contaminant levels in the water supply. The system has 83 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. 34 remain unresolved.

Gray ranks #309 out of 372 cities in Georgia for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Of particular concern: PFAS "forever chemical" levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels. These synthetic compounds don't break down naturally and require specialized filtration such as reverse osmosis or granular activated carbon. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.39 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. The system has seen 21 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 51.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
18.2 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants7 PFAS compounds detected.
9.9 / 20D
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
3 / 10F
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Gray's water

Every contaminant flagged in Gray, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

12 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
16.7000 µg/L 120% of limit

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
149.0 µg/L 71% of limit
Cobalt Inorganic
11.30 µg/L 50% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
14.5 µg/L 29% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
16.7 µg/L 28% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
176.0 µg/L 12% of limit
Vanadium Inorganic
0.92 µg/L 4% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
1.30 µg/L 3% of limit
41 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 18 detected · 2 PFAS over EPA MCL · PFAS hazard index 3.27 (above the 1.0 threshold) Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.41 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 16.700 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFHxS 0.004 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA 0.007 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFOS 0.006 0.004 µg/L PFAS Over MCL
PFPeA 0.003 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Gray's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 83 violations on record, including 1 health-based violation. 34 remain unresolved.

3 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

28 monitoring & paperwork 9 still unresolved
PFAS7 PFAS "forever chemical" compounds detectedPFAS levels exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels. Reverse osmosis or activated carbon filtration recommended.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Gray's water quality assessment. Grade: D+ (51.2/100).
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation16 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Consumer Confidence Rule, Cadmium, CYANIDE.Open
DisasterHURRICANE MICHAELFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4400). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0510152025EPA action level · 15 ppb2000 — 0 ppb2001 — 2.5 ppb2002 — 2.6 ppb2003 — 12 ppb2004 — 2.5 ppb2005 — 2.5 ppb2006 — 0 ppb2007 — 12 ppb2008 — 2.5 ppb2009 — 7.2 ppb2010 — 6.3 ppb2011 — 10 ppb2012 — 4.9 ppb2013 — 3 ppb2014 — 4.2 ppb2015 — 2.9 ppb2016 — 20 ppb2017 — 1.1 ppb2018 — 8.7 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2021 — 6.5 ppb2022 — 1 ppb2023 — 7.5 ppb2024 — 4.3 ppb2025 — 0 ppb2026 — 0 ppb2027 — 0 ppb0200020062012201820242027

Down 0 ppb since 2000. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2027) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
01000200030004000EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L2001 — 3140 mg/L2023 — 1.4 mg/L31401.420012023

Down 3139 mg/L since 2001. The latest reading (1.4 mg/L, 2023) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Gray's water comes from

Gray's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

6 systems

6 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

22,909 people

Residents served across Gray's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 22,909 people through 6 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
JONES COUNTY GA1690002 12,736 Purchased Surface Water
GRAY GA1690000 9,551 Groundwater
TIMBER RIDGE SUBDIVISION GA0210075 381 Groundwater
PAVATI WATER COMPANY, LLC GA2890009 108 Groundwater
RUTLAND STATION GA0210078 103 Groundwater
MARION ESTATES SUBDIVISION GA2890030 30 Groundwater

05Pressure on Gray's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

6 federal disaster declarations on record for Jones County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-4400
HURRICANE MICHAEL Oct 2018 · DR-3406
HURRICANE IRMA Sep 2017 · DR-4338

06How Gray compares

Scores for nearby Georgia cities on one line, with the average marked.

Decatur
84.8 · B+
Morrow
83.6 · B+
Marietta
82.2 · B+
Gray (this city)
51.2 · D+
Alpharetta
41.4 · F
Atlanta
37.2 · F

dashed line = Georgia average (61/100)

Gray scores 51.2/100below the Georgia average of 61/100. It outscores 5 of 10 nearby cities. Full Georgia rankings →

Jones water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Gray's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Reverse osmosis system. PFAS compounds exceed EPA maximum contaminant levels

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Gray alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Gray, GA tap water safe to drink?

Gray's water quality earned a grade of D+ (51.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #309 out of 372 cities tested in Georgia.

What contaminants are in Gray's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 7 PFAS compounds were detected. 83 violations are on record.

How is Gray's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Gray?

PFAS compounds exceed EPA limits — a reverse osmosis or activated carbon filter is recommended.

Where does Gray's water come from?

Gray's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 6 water systems serving approximately 22,909 residents.

What health violations has Gray's water system had?

Gray has 1 health-based violation on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 34 violations remain unresolved.

Why does Gray have so many PFAS compounds in its water?

7 different PFAS "forever chemical" compounds were detected in Gray's water supply during UCMR 5 testing. PFAS contamination often originates from proximity to military installations (AFFF firefighting foam), airports, industrial manufacturing sites, or wastewater treatment facilities. Some levels exceed the 2024 EPA maximum contaminant levels — a reverse osmosis or NSF-certified activated carbon filter is strongly recommended.

How does Gray's water compare to other cities?

Gray ranks #309 out of 372 cities in Georgia (better than 17% of state cities) and #12658 out of 15382 cities nationally (18th percentile). The grade of D+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Gray, GA: Gray is a city in Jones County, Georgia, United States. The population was 3,436 at the 2020 census, up from 3,276 at the 2010 census. In 2025, its population was estimated at 3,555. The city is the county seat of Jones County. It is part of the Macon metropolitan area. Median household income $61,136 · median home value $179,850 · median age 35.7 · 74.2% homeowners · 23.1% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Jones.
Show ZIP codes 31032
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.