WaterVerge

Is Grantham, NH Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+, with 15 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do next ↓

3K residents served 2 water systems PWSID: NH0951010
Overall Score
81 / 100
Violations
15 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#26 of 119 in New Hampshire Top 49% nationally
Local Government
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
B+GRADE
Water Quality Grade
81/100
waterverge.com
B+ 81/100

Grantham, NH — Water Quality Report

Grantham's drinking water received a grade of B+ (81 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,450 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals.

The system has 50 violations on record, including 11 health-based violations. 15 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Grantham's water

Grantham ranks #26 out of 119 cities in New Hampshire for water quality, placing it above average in the state.

Grantham relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
81 out of 100 Grade B+
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
35/45
B
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
16/20
B
Lead at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
20/20
A
No PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
5/10
D
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Grantham, NH water safe to drink?

Concerns Identified

Grantham's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (81/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 3,450 residents using groundwater (wells).

15
Active Violations
7.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
None
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Grantham

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Grantham's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (81/100).

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.

Disaster
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4740). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
SEVERE STORM AND FLOODING

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4624). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Public Notice.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Grantham's water supply.

Lead Elevated
Detected: 7.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Within EPA limits but above the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended level of 1 ppb. An NSF 53-certified filter provides additional protection.

Violation history

Grantham's water system has 50 total violations on record, including 11 health-based violations. 15 remain unresolved. 4 violations were issued in the last 5 years.

MROtherRPTTTMCL
Most recent violations:
Jan 2025 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Sep 2021 Public Notice Open
Mar 2021 Public Notice Open
Jan 2021 Lead and Copper Rule Open
Jul 2020 Lead and Copper Rule Open

Flood & environmental risk

Sullivan County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1990. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11,.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4740
SEVERE STORM AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA DR-4624
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-4095

Where does Grantham's water come from?

Grantham's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 2 water systems serving approximately 3,450 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11, (river).

What Grantham residents can do

Install a water filter

Recommended: NSF-certified water filter. This addresses the specific contaminants found in Grantham's water.

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Flush your taps

Run cold water for 30 seconds before drinking, especially in the morning. Lead and copper leach from household plumbing when water sits in pipes.

Monitor alerts during storms

Grantham's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
7.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 47% of limit
Safe Level
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
0
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

50
Total violations
11
Health-based
15
Active / unresolved
Jan 2025
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

50 Total
15 Active
11 Health-based
35 Resolved
Violations by category
Volatile Organic Chemicals
21
Total Coliform Rule
11
Consumer Confidence Rule
6
Lead and Copper Rule
4
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
3
Jan 2025 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Sep 2021 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Mar 2021 Active
Public Notice
Other Violation 0
Jan 2021 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2020 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2018 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jun 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Reporting
Reporting 0
Jun 2017 Active
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Jan 2017 Active
E. COLI
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2014 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2014 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2013 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jul 2012 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Jan 2009 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting 0
Jul 2008 Active
Consumer Confidence Rule
Other Violation 0
Apr 2019 Resolved
Chlorine
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jul 2019
Jan 2019 Resolved
Chlorine
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Apr 2019
Jan 2009 Resolved
Chlorine
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Apr 2009
Jul 2007 Resolved
Vinyl chloride
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2007
Jul 2007 Resolved
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Sep 2007
Showing 20 of 50 violations
Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Sullivan County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

14
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
5.0%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
14
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Sep 2023
Most recent
Flood
Most common type

Sullivan County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1990. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Sep 2023
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4740
Oct 2021
SEVERE STORM AND FLOODING
Flood FEMA #4624
Nov 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #4095
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3360
Sep 2011
TROPICAL STORM IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #4026
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #3333

Recommended water filters

Based on contaminants detected in Grantham's water supply, we recommend the following filter types.

🚰
For Lead
Reverse Osmosis or NSF 53-Certified Pitcher
Lead detected at 7.0 ppb
Read our guide →

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 7.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 99.0 ppb from 1993 (106.0 ppb) to 2024 (7.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Local Government
Population Served
3,450
Water Systems
2
Water Source

Where Grantham's water comes from

Groundwater

Grantham's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 3,450 people through 2 water systems.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Grantham

Grantham is located near 1 notable water body. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Sugar River 0.2 Mi Below Nh 11,
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Grantham

System Name PWSID Population Source
VILLAGE DIST OF EASTMAN NH0951010 3,400 GW
GRAY LEDGES NH0952020 50 GW
Regional Comparison

How Grantham compares

Full New Hampshire rankings →

Grantham's score of 81/100 is above the average of 69/100 among major New Hampshire cities. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities.

Grantham (this city)
81
Manchester
50.9
Nashua
88.7
Concord
51.3
Portsmouth
80.7
Keene
89.2
New Hampshire avg
69
City Profile

About Grantham, NH

Economic Profile
$114,132
Median Income
$352,270
Median Home Value
2.6%
Unemployment
Community
52.1
Median Age
48
People / sq mi
59.4%
College Educated
95%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Grantham, NH tap water safe to drink?

Grantham's water quality earned a grade of B+ (81/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #26 out of 119 cities tested in New Hampshire.

What contaminants are in Grantham's water?

Lead was measured at 7.0 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 50 violations are on record.

How is Grantham's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Grantham?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Grantham's water come from?

Grantham's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 3,450 residents.

What health violations has Grantham's water system had?

Grantham has 11 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in January 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 15 violations remain unresolved.

Is Grantham's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Grantham uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 50 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Grantham's water compare to other cities?

Grantham ranks #26 out of 119 cities in New Hampshire (better than 78% of state cities) and #7624 out of 15744 cities nationally (52th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.