Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Fredonia (V), NY Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D, with 4 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
6.1 ppb lead, 90th percentile
4 unresolved violations
9K people served by 1 water system

PWSID NY0600364 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 47.4 / 100

#773 of 810New York cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Fredonia (V) water safe?

Fredonia (V)'s drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (47.4/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 9,455 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

4 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

No forever chemicals detected

UCMR 5 laboratory testing found no PFAS compounds above detection thresholds in this system.

See PFAS results ↓
Keep watching

HAA5 is approaching its limit

Measured at 52.1 µg/L — 87% of the 60 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Fredonia (V)'s drinking water received a grade of D (47.4 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 9,455 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 6.1 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 98 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 4 remain unresolved.

Fredonia (V) ranks #773 out of 810 cities in New York for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. Haloacetic acid (HAA5) levels were elevated at 52.1 µg/L in UCMR 4 testing, though below the 60 µg/L EPA limit. Activated carbon filtration can help reduce these disinfection byproducts. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.06 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection. The system has seen 85 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 47.4/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 6.1 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
17.4 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Fredonia (V)'s water

Every contaminant flagged in Fredonia (V), on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

6 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Near MCL — EPA MCL: 60 µg/L

Disinfection byproducts form when chlorine reacts with organic matter in source water, typically peaking in warm months. An activated-carbon filter reduces them at the tap.
ElevatedUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 4.5 µg/L What to do →
Manganese Inorganic
18.4 µg/L 37% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
86.0 µg/L 6% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
1.80 µg/L 5% of limit
36 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 6 detected Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 6.1 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Fredonia (V)'s ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 98 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 4 remain unresolved.

6 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

85 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Fredonia (V)'s water quality assessment. Grade: D (47.4/100).
Violation32 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4129). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterHURRICANE SANDYFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3351). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0510152025EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 14 ppb1998 — 11 ppb2000 — 11 ppb2001 — 7 ppb2003 — 7 ppb2007 — 18 ppb2008 — 13 ppb2009 — 11 ppb2010 — 5.3 ppb2011 — 11 ppb2012 — 6 ppb2013 — 7.4 ppb2016 — 4.8 ppb2019 — 5.6 ppb2021 — 4.7 ppb2022 — 7.8 ppb2023 — 6.1 ppb146.119922003201020162023

Down 7.9 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 6.1 ppb (2023) — 41% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Fredonia (V)'s water comes from

Fredonia (V)'s drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

9,455 people

Residents served across Fredonia (V)'s service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 9,455 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
FREDONIA VILLAGE NY0600364 9,455 Surface Water

Water bodies near Fredonia (V)

Canadaway Creek · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Fredonia (V)'s drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Fredonia (V)'s watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

4 federal disaster declarations on record for Chautauqua County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Jul 2013 · DR-4129
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3351
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3262

06How Fredonia (V) compares

Scores for nearby New York cities on one line, with the average marked.

New York (C)
89 · A-
Smithtown (T)
84.8 · B+
Islip (T)
71.8 · B-
Fredonia (V) (this city)
47.4 · D

dashed line = New York average (78/100)

Fredonia (V) scores 47.4/100below the New York average of 78/100. Full New York rankings →

Chautauqua water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Fredonia (V)'s water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 6.1 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Fredonia (V) alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Fredonia (V), NY tap water safe to drink?

Fredonia (V)'s water quality earned a grade of D (47.4/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #773 out of 810 cities tested in New York.

What contaminants are in Fredonia (V)'s water?

Lead was measured at 6.1 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 98 violations are on record.

How is Fredonia (V)'s water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Fredonia (V)?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Fredonia (V)'s water come from?

Fredonia (V)'s water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 9,455 residents.

How does Fredonia (V)'s water compare to other cities?

Fredonia (V) ranks #773 out of 810 cities in New York (better than 5% of state cities) and #13350 out of 15382 cities nationally (13th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Fredonia (V), NY: Fredonia is a village in Chautauqua County, New York, United States. The population was 9,871 as of the 2020 census. Fredonia is in the town of Pomfret south of Lake Erie. The village is the home of the State University of New York at Fredonia. Wikipedia → Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.