WaterVerge

Is Fort Meade, MD Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded A — but Chlorate was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do next ↓

62K residents served 1 water system PWSID: MD0020012
Overall Score
91.8 / 100
Violations
2 active
Last Updated
May 2026
Source
Groundwater
#5 of 107 in Maryland Top 9% nationally
Federal
High data confidence
Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated May 2026
AGRADE
Water Quality Grade
91.8/100
waterverge.com
A 91.8/100

Fort Meade, MD — Water Quality Report

Fort Meade's drinking water received a grade of A (91.8 out of 100), indicating excellent water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 62,234 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals.

The system has 21 violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

Data last updated: May 2026 · Source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5
Analysis

What to know about Fort Meade's water

Fort Meade ranks #5 out of 107 cities in Maryland for water quality, placing it one of the best in the state.

Fort Meade relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff.

Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 0.06 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

Quality Breakdown

Water quality score

See methodology →
91.8 out of 100 Grade A
A: 90-100
B: 74-89
C: 60-73
F: <50
How is this calculated?
Violations
43.3/45
A
Historical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
Lead & Copper
19/20
A
Lead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
Contaminants
16.6/20
B
No PFAS compounds detected.
Compliance
8/10
B
Monitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
Source Risk
5/5
A
Water source: Groundwater.
Water Safety

Is Fort Meade, MD water safe to drink?

Use Caution

Fort Meade's tap water meets most EPA standards but has areas that warrant attention. With a grade of A (91.8/100), some contaminant levels or compliance issues suggest that residents may benefit from additional filtration. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 62,234 residents using groundwater (wells).

2
Active Violations
0.0 ppb
Lead (90th %ile)
None
PFAS Detected
10 events
Disaster History

Recent water quality updates for Fort Meade

A timeline of significant water quality events, violations, and data updates.

Update
Water quality data updated

Latest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Fort Meade's water quality assessment. Grade: A (91.8/100).

Disaster
HURRICANE SANDY

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4091). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Disaster
HURRICANE SANDY

Federal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3349). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.

Violation
12 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury.

Violation
1 drinking water violation recorded

Contaminants: Coliform (TCR).

Violation
2 drinking water violations recorded

Contaminants: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM.

Key contaminant findings

Based on the most recent EPA sampling data for Fort Meade's water supply.

Lead Within Limits
Detected: 0.0 ppb Limit: 15 ppb (EPA Action Level)

Well within EPA limits.

Violation history

Fort Meade's water system has 21 total violations on record, including 3 health-based violations. 2 remain unresolved.

MRTTMCL
Most recent violations:
Jan 2010 Cadmium Resolved
Jan 2010 Chromium Resolved
Jan 2010 Mercury Resolved
Jan 2010 Antimony, Total Resolved
Jan 2010 Beryllium, Total Resolved

Flood & environmental risk

Anne Arundel County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1971. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm water treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and introduce agricultural runoff, bacteria, and sediment into drinking water supplies. Local water sources include Patapsco River, East Branch Herbert Run, Sawmill Creek, South Fork Jabez Branch, Patuxent River Near Laurel.

HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-4091
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA DR-3349
REMNANTS OF TROPICAL STORM LEE
Flood FEMA DR-4038

Where does Fort Meade's water come from?

Fort Meade's drinking water comes from groundwater (wells), supplied by 1 water system serving approximately 62,234 people. Groundwater is generally less susceptible to surface contamination but can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate. Nearby water bodies include Patapsco River (river), East Branch Herbert Run (river), Sawmill Creek (river), South Fork Jabez Branch (river), Patuxent River Near Laurel (river).

What Fort Meade residents can do

Request your utility's CCR

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) with detailed testing results. Ask for the latest copy or check your utility's website.

Monitor alerts during storms

Fort Meade's area has a history of flooding. After severe weather, watch for boil water advisories from your local utility.

Data: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5 (PFAS), FEMA, NOAA. Last updated May 2026.

Contaminant Alerts

Top contaminants to know

View all ↓
Lead (90th percentile)
Inorganic / Heavy Metal
Safe
0.0 ppb
EPA Action Level: 15 ppb · 0% of limit
Safe Level
HAA5 (Disinfection Byproducts)
Disinfection Byproduct
Safe
0.9 µg/L
EPA MCL: 60 µg/L · 2% of limit
Within LimitUCMR 4 DataHAA6Br: 0.3 µg/LHAA9: 1.3 µg/L
Chromium-6 (Hexavalent Chromium)
Inorganic
Detected
0.06 µg/L
CA MCL (no federal MCL): 10 µg/L · 1% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Strontium
Inorganic
Detected
9.5 µg/L
EPA Health Ref Level: 1,500 µg/L · 1% of limit
DetectedUCMR 3 Data
Manganese
Inorganic
Detected
2.0 µg/L
EPA Secondary MCL: 50 µg/L · 4% of limit
DetectedUCMR 4 Data
Chlorate
Disinfection Byproduct
Over HA
300.0 µg/L
EPA Lifetime HA: 210 µg/L · +20% over limit
Over Health AdvisoryUCMR 3 Data
PFAS Testing

Forever chemicals overview

National PFAS report →
30
Compounds tested
0
Detected
0
Exceed EPA MCL
Compliance Record

Violation summary

21
Total violations
3
Health-based
2
Active / unresolved
Jan 2010
Most recent violation
Compliance Record

Violations & advisories

21 Total
2 Active
3 Health-based
19 Resolved
Violations by category
Inorganic Chemicals
10
Total Coliform Rule
2
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule
2
Lead and Copper Rule
2
Nitrate Rule
1
Jul 1998 Active
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health 0
Active
Compliance Violation
Monitoring 0
Jan 2010 Resolved
Cadmium
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Chromium
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Mercury
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Antimony, Total
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Beryllium, Total
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Thallium, Total
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Selenium
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Fluoride
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Barium
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Arsenic
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Jan 2010 Resolved
Nickel
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2010
Apr 2008 Resolved
Coliform (TCR)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Apr 2008
Oct 2002 Resolved
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2002
Oct 2002 Resolved
TTHM
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 2002
Jan 2002 Resolved
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Jan 2002
Oct 1998 Resolved
Lead and Copper Rule
Treatment Technique
Health-Based Health Resolved Dec 1998
Dec 1994 Resolved
Surface Water Treatment Rule
Monitoring & Reporting
Monitoring & Reporting Resolved Dec 1994
Showing 20 of 21 violations
Industrial pollution

Top industrial polluters within 10 miles of Fort Meade

Industrial polluters nearby

Reported releases to surface water by facilities near Fort Meade, ranked by pounds discharged annually.

Total reported releases to surface water: 3 lbs

FacilityTop chemicalTo surface water (lbs/yr)Distance
TATE ACCESS FLOORS INC.
Fabricated Metals · TATE INC
JESSUP, MD20794
Zinc compounds24.3 mi
OLDCASTLE APG MID-ATLANTIC CROFTON MD
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · CRH AMERICAS INC
ODENTON, MD21113
Lead compounds06.4 mi
EATON AEROSPACE
Fabricated Metals · EATON CORP
BELTSVILLE, MD20705
9.1 mi
U.S. DHS JAMES J. ROWLEY TRAINING CENTER
Other · US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
LAUREL, MD20708
7.4 mi
SCHUSTER CONCRETE READY MIX LLC-VAN DUSEN RD
Nonmetallic Mineral Product · SCHUSTER CONCRETE READY MIX LLC
LAUREL, MD20707
9.6 mi

Source: EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 2023

Site context

Superfund sites within 10 miles of Fort Meade

Superfund sites nearby

Federally tracked hazardous-waste sites on the EPA National Priorities List. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

Source: EPA Superfund National Priorities List

Environmental Risk

Drought conditions

D2 — severe drought

Anne Arundel County is currently in D2 (severe drought) per the U.S. Drought Monitor (week of May 5, 2026). Drought can elevate disinfection-byproduct (TTHM/HAA5) levels and taste/odor issues as utilities draw from lower reservoirs.

4
Weeks at D2+ (current streak)
10.4%
Months in D2+ (last 30y)
7
Weeks at D2+ (last 5y)

Source: U.S. Drought Monitor, updated weekly by NDMC, USDA, and NOAA.

Environmental Risk

Flood & disaster history

10
Declared disasters
Nov 2012
Most recent
Hurricane
Most common type

Anne Arundel County has experienced 10 federally declared disasters since 1971. Flooding and severe weather can compromise water treatment infrastructure and introduce contaminants into drinking water supplies.

Nov 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #4091
Oct 2012
HURRICANE SANDY
Hurricane FEMA #3349
Oct 2011
REMNANTS OF TROPICAL STORM LEE
Flood FEMA #4038
Aug 2011
HURRICANE IRENE
Hurricane FEMA #3335
Sep 2005
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION
Hurricane FEMA #3251
Sep 2003
HURRICANE ISABEL
Hurricane FEMA #1492

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

Lead level trend (90th percentile)

EPA action level: 15 ppb
Lead has decreased by 7.0 ppb from 1992 (7.0 ppb) to 2019 (0.0 ppb).
Infrastructure

Water source & infrastructure

Primary Source
Groundwater
Operator
Federal
Population Served
62,234
Water Systems
1
Water Source

Where Fort Meade's water comes from

Groundwater

Fort Meade's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals.

Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds.

The system is operated by federal ownership and serves approximately 62,234 people through 1 water system.

Local Hydrology

Water bodies near Fort Meade

Fort Meade is located near 5 notable water bodies. These water bodies contribute to the regional watershed and may indirectly affect groundwater quality.

Patapsco River
river
East Branch Herbert Run
river
Sawmill Creek
river
South Fork Jabez Branch
river
Patuxent River Near Laurel
river
Infrastructure

Water systems serving Fort Meade

System Name PWSID Population Source
FORT GEORGE G. MEADE MD0020012 62,234 GW
Regional Comparison

How Fort Meade compares

Full Maryland rankings →

Fort Meade's score of 91.8/100 is above the average of 57/100 among major Maryland cities. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities.

Fort Meade (this city)
91.8
Laurel
95
Baltimore
39.8
Frederick
37.5
Maryland avg
57
City Profile

About Fort Meade, MD

Wikipedia →

Fort Meade is a census-designated place (CDP) in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, United States. The population was 9,324 at the 2020 census. It is the home to the National Security Agency, Central Security Service, United States Cyber Command and the Defense Information Systems Agency, which are located on the U.S. Army post Fort George G. Meade.

Economic Profile
$94,110
Median Income
$2,331/mo
Median Rent
4.6%
Unemployment
Community
27.2
Median Age
478
People / sq mi
42.6%
College Educated
0.2%
Homeownership
Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail

Frequently asked questions

Is Fort Meade, MD tap water safe to drink?

Fort Meade's water quality earned a grade of A (91.8/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #5 out of 107 cities tested in Maryland.

What contaminants are in Fort Meade's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 21 violations are on record.

How is Fort Meade's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Fort Meade?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Fort Meade's water come from?

Fort Meade's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 62,234 residents.

What health violations has Fort Meade's water system had?

Fort Meade has 3 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in January 2010. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 2 violations remain unresolved.

Is Fort Meade's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Fort Meade uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 21 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Fort Meade's water compare to other cities?

Fort Meade ranks #5 out of 107 cities in Maryland (better than 95% of state cities) and #1470 out of 15744 cities nationally (91th percentile). The grade of A reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.