Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is First Mesa Consolidated Villages, AZ Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded D, with 31 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
1.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
31 unresolved violations
4K people served by 1 water system

PWSID 090400106 · high data confidence · native american utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
D 47.2 / 100

#194 of 271Arizona cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is First Mesa Consolidated Villages water safe?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of D (47.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 4,108 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

31 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 1.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 34.1000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

First Mesa Consolidated Villages's drinking water received a grade of D (47.2 out of 100), indicating poor water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 4,108 residents using purchased ground water.

Lead levels were measured at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 376 violations on record, including 74 health-based violations. 31 remain unresolved.

First Mesa Consolidated Villages ranks #194 out of 271 cities in Arizona for water quality, placing it below average in the state. First Mesa Consolidated Villages purchases its water from a regional wholesaler, meaning quality depends on both the supplier's treatment and the local distribution system's condition. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. The system has seen 33 violations in the past five years, suggesting a pattern of compliance challenges that residents should monitor closely.

How the 47.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
0 / 45F
Lead & CopperLead at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
14.2 / 20C
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Purchased ground water.
5 / 5A

02What's in First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water

Every contaminant flagged in First Mesa Consolidated Villages, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

5 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
34.1000 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
34.1 µg/L 57% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
0.9 µg/L 2% of limit
34 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 5 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 1.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 34.100 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03First Mesa Consolidated Villages's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 376 violations on record, including 74 health-based violations. 31 remain unresolved.

2 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

30 health-based in 10 yrs 23 monitoring & paperwork 9 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water quality assessment. Grade: D (47.2/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule, E. COLI.Open
Violation3 drinking water violations recorded2 health-based. Contaminants: Arsenic, E. COLI, Revised Total Coliform Rule.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4620). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
0204060EPA action level · 15 ppb1996 — 2 ppb1998 — 3 ppb2000 — 48 ppb2001 — 2.2 ppb2004 — 1.6 ppb2007 — 1.5 ppb2010 — 2.8 ppb2013 — 3 ppb2016 — 1 ppb2019 — 0.50 ppb2022 — 0.90 ppb2025 — 1 ppb2119962001201020192025

Down 1 ppb since 1996. Latest reading: 1 ppb (2025) — 7% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water comes from

First Mesa Consolidated Villages purchases its water supply from a regional wholesale provider rather than treating raw water directly.

Source

Purchased Groundwater

Water is bought from a regional wholesaler; quality starts at the supplier's intake and treatment.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Primary treatment happens at the wholesaler; the local utility maintains disinfectant residual in its pipes.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under native american ownership.

Delivery

4,108 people

Residents served across First Mesa Consolidated Villages's service area.

Water quality depends on both the wholesaler's treatment standards and the condition of First Mesa Consolidated Villages's local distribution pipes and storage facilities. Purchased water systems are common in suburban areas and smaller communities that lack the infrastructure for independent treatment. The system is operated by native american ownership and serves approximately 4,108 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
Polacca 090400106 4,108 Purchased Groundwater

05Pressure on First Mesa Consolidated Villages's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

8 federal disaster declarations on record for Navajo County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Sep 2021 · DR-4620
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3241
SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES & FLOODING Jan 1993 · DR-977

06How First Mesa Consolidated Villages compares

Scores for nearby Arizona cities on one line, with the average marked.

First Mesa Consolidated Villages (this city)
47.2 · D
Mesa
40.6 · F
Chandler
40.5 · F
Tucson
38.1 · F
Phoenix
37.5 · F
Gilbert
34.8 · F

dashed line = Arizona average (41/100)

First Mesa Consolidated Villages scores 47.2/100above the Arizona average of 41/100. It outscores 9 of 10 nearby cities. Full Arizona rankings →

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for First Mesa Consolidated Villages alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is First Mesa Consolidated Villages, AZ tap water safe to drink?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water quality earned a grade of D (47.2/100). Significant issues have been found. A water filter is strongly recommended. The city ranks #194 out of 271 cities tested in Arizona.

What contaminants are in First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water?

Lead was measured at 1.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 376 violations are on record.

How is First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in First Mesa Consolidated Villages?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water come from?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water is sourced from Purchased ground water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 4,108 residents.

What health violations has First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water system had?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages has 74 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 31 violations remain unresolved.

Is First Mesa Consolidated Villages's groundwater at risk of contamination?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 376 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does First Mesa Consolidated Villages's water compare to other cities?

First Mesa Consolidated Villages ranks #194 out of 271 cities in Arizona (better than 28% of state cities) and #13384 out of 15382 cities nationally (13th percentile). The grade of D reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.