Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Exeter, CA Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B — but Vanadium and Chlorate were detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

2 contaminants over a legal limit
0.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
6 unresolved violations
12K people served by 3 water systems

PWSID CA5410003 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 76.7 / 100

#430 of 690California cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Exeter water safe?

Exeter's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B (76.7/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 11,787 residents using groundwater (wells).

The concern

Vanadium is over its legal limit

Measured at 38.00 µg/L against the EPA Short-term HA of 21 µg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 0.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

5 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Exeter's drinking water received a grade of B (76.7 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 3 water systems serve approximately 11,787 residents using groundwater.

Lead levels were measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. This system has not yet been tested for PFAS under the EPA UCMR 5 program. The system has 72 violations on record, including 41 health-based violations. 6 remain unresolved.

Exeter ranks #430 out of 690 cities in California for water quality, placing it below average in the state. Exeter relies on groundwater, which is generally less vulnerable to surface contamination but can be affected by naturally occurring minerals like arsenic and nitrate, as well as agricultural and industrial runoff. Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was detected at 2.50 µg/L in UCMR 3 testing. While below California's 10 µg/L limit and with no federal MCL set, residents sensitive to this contaminant may consider reverse osmosis filtration.

How the 76.7/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
28.4 / 45C
Lead & CopperLead at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile).
20 / 20A
ContaminantsPFAS + legacy contaminant analysis.
15.3 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
8 / 10B
Source RiskWater source: Groundwater.
5 / 5A

02What's in Exeter's water

Every contaminant flagged in Exeter, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

8 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
Vanadium Inorganic
38.00 µg/L 120% of limit
Chlorate Disinfection Byproduct
480.0 µg/L 120% of limit
Strontium Inorganic
560.0 µg/L 37% of limit
Manganese Inorganic
15.0 µg/L 30% of limit
Molybdenum Inorganic
8.30 µg/L 21% of limit
8 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 8 detected · not yet tested for PFAS under UCMR 5 Contaminants without a federal MCL are shown against the strictest state or advisory level named in each row.

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 0.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Exeter's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 72 violations on record, including 41 health-based violations. 6 remain unresolved.

6 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

2 health-based in 10 yrs 9 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Exeter's water quality assessment. Grade: B (76.7/100).
Violation2 drinking water violations recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS.Open
Violation2 drinking water violations recordedContaminants: TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5).Resolved
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3592). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
DisasterSEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDESFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4683). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recorded1 health-based. Contaminants: Nitrate.Resolved
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 3 ppb1993 — 2 ppb1995 — 3 ppb1996 — 5 ppb1997 — 0 ppb1998 — 10 ppb1999 — 6 ppb2000 — 5 ppb2001 — 5 ppb2002 — 0 ppb2003 — 0 ppb2004 — 0 ppb2005 — 5 ppb2006 — 0 ppb2008 — 2.5 ppb2009 — 0 ppb2011 — 0 ppb2012 — 0 ppb2014 — 0 ppb2015 — 0 ppb2016 — 0 ppb2017 — 0 ppb2018 — 0 ppb2019 — 0 ppb2020 — 1.5 ppb2021 — 0 ppb2022 — 0 ppb2023 — 1.7 ppb2024 — 0 ppb2025 — 0 ppb30199219992005201420202025

Down 3 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 0 ppb (2025) — 0% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Exeter's water comes from

Exeter's drinking water is drawn from underground aquifers through wells.

Source

Groundwater

Underground aquifers reached by wells — naturally filtered, but can carry minerals like arsenic and nitrate.

Treatment

Local treatment

Groundwater generally needs less treatment — typically disinfection and, where needed, mineral removal.

Distribution

3 systems

3 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

11,787 people

Residents served across Exeter's service area.

Groundwater is naturally filtered through rock and soil layers, generally requiring less treatment than surface water. However, it can contain naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and minerals. Agricultural activity, septic systems, and industrial operations near well fields can introduce nitrates, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 11,787 people through 3 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
EXETER, CITY OF CA5410003 11,169 Groundwater
TOOLEVILLE MUTUAL NON PROFIT WATER ASSN CA5400567 340 Groundwater
BADGER HILL ESTATES CA5400710 278 Groundwater

05Pressure on Exeter's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

3 facilities within 10 miles reported 0 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

CEMEX FARMERSVILLE PLANT 0 lb · 4.0 mi
MCWANE PLANT & INDUSTRIAL 0 lb · 3.4 mi
ACTUS NUTRITION - VISALIA 0 lb · 9.6 mi

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

9 federal disaster declarations on record for Tulare County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Mar 2023 · DR-3592
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, LANDSLIDES, AND MUDSLIDES Jan 2023 · DR-4683
SEVERE WINTER STORMS, FLOODING, AND MUDSLIDES Jan 2023 · DR-3591

06How Exeter compares

Scores for nearby California cities on one line, with the average marked.

Oakland
77.9 · B
Exeter (this city)
76.7 · B
Los Angeles
42.8 · F
San Diego
39.7 · F
Sacramento
31.2 · F
San Jose
28 · F

dashed line = California average (57/100)

Exeter scores 76.7/100above the California average of 57/100. It outscores 7 of 10 nearby cities. Full California rankings →

Tulare water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Exeter's water — not generic advice.

Extra protection

A basic carbon filter still helps

Exeter's water meets federal standards, but a simple carbon filter improves taste and adds a margin of safety against short-term issues.

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Exeter alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Exeter, CA tap water safe to drink?

Exeter's water quality earned a grade of B (76.7/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #430 out of 690 cities tested in California.

What contaminants are in Exeter's water?

Lead was measured at 0.0 ppb (90th percentile). 72 violations are on record.

How is Exeter's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Exeter?

Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Exeter's water come from?

Exeter's water is sourced from Groundwater. The city has 3 water systems serving approximately 11,787 residents.

What health violations has Exeter's water system had?

Exeter has 41 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in October 2024. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 6 violations remain unresolved.

Is Exeter's groundwater at risk of contamination?

Exeter uses groundwater, which can be affected by naturally occurring contaminants like arsenic, radon, and nitrate, as well as agricultural runoff and industrial activity. The system has 72 violations on record that may relate to groundwater quality. Groundwater systems are generally less susceptible to surface contamination but should be monitored for emerging contaminants like PFAS.

How does Exeter's water compare to other cities?

Exeter ranks #430 out of 690 cities in California (better than 38% of state cities) and #9100 out of 15382 cities nationally (41th percentile). The grade of B reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Exeter, CA: Exeter is a city in Tulare County, California, United States. It is situated in the San Joaquin Valley near the foothills of the Sierra Nevada. The population was 10,321 at the 2020 census, down from 10,334 at the 2010 census. Median household income $65,750 · median home value $252,769 · median age 32.4 · 58.4% homeowners · 12.1% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Tulare.
Show ZIP codes 93221
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.