Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Esperance (T), NY Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B- — but Copper was detected above EPA limits. Here's what's in the water and how to remove it. What to do ↓

1 contaminant over a legal limit
3.0 ppb lead, 90th percentile · low
6 unresolved violations
560 people served by 2 water systems

PWSID NY4700093 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 70.2 / 100

#689 of 810New York cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Esperance (T) water safe?

Esperance (T)'s drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B- (70.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 560 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

Copper is over its legal limit

Measured at 1.60 mg/L against the EPA Action Level of 1.3 mg/L. The ledger below shows how far over — and which filter removes it.

See the measurement ↓
The good news

Lead is well under the limit

90th-percentile lead is 3.0 ppb — beneath the 15 ppb federal action level and under the 5 ppb watch threshold.

See the trend ↓
Keep watching

lithium is approaching its limit

Measured at 921.0000 µg/L — 120% of the 0.004 µg/L limit. Within the rules, but with less headroom than you'd want.

See the ledger ↓

Esperance (T)'s drinking water received a grade of B- (70.2 out of 100), indicating fair water quality. The city's 2 water systems serve approximately 560 residents using surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 3.0 ppb (90th percentile), well within EPA limits. UCMR 5 testing detected 1 PFAS compound in the water supply. The system has 134 violations on record, including 94 health-based violations. 6 remain unresolved.

Esperance (T) ranks #689 out of 810 cities in New York for water quality, placing it among the lowest-rated in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. PFAS compounds were detected in testing, though levels remain within current EPA limits. Residents seeking extra precaution may consider an activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. As a small community water system, Esperance (T) may have fewer resources for advanced treatment technologies and infrastructure upgrades compared to larger utilities.

How the 70.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
24 / 45D
Lead & CopperLead at 3.0 ppb (90th percentile).
16 / 20B
Contaminants1 PFAS compound detected.
16.2 / 20B
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
10 / 10A
Source RiskWater source: Surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Esperance (T)'s water

Every contaminant flagged in Esperance (T), on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

4 detections · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%

Over Limit — EPA Action Level: 1.3 mg/L

Exceeds the EPA action level. Copper leaches from household plumbing — flush taps for 30 seconds before drinking, and consider a certified filter.
Exceeds Limit What to do →
lithium PFAS / Forever Chemical
921.0000 µg/L 120% of limit
Lithium Inorganic
921.0 µg/L 120% of limit
33 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 4 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 3.0 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
Copper (90th percentile) 1.60 1.3 mg/L Inorganic Over Limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium 921.000 HI µg/L PFAS Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Esperance (T)'s ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 134 violations on record, including 94 health-based violations. 6 remain unresolved.

7 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

6 monitoring & paperwork 2 still unresolved
PFAS1 PFAS "forever chemical" compound detectedDetected at levels within current EPA limits. PFAS persist indefinitely in the environment.
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Esperance (T)'s water quality assessment. Grade: B- (70.2/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Revised Total Coliform Rule.Resolved
DisasterHURRICANE HENRIFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-3565). Hurricane event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1993 — 2 ppb2001 — 13 ppb2004 — 2 ppb2005 — 1 ppb2007 — 5 ppb2008 — 0.90 ppb2010 — 2 ppb2011 — 1.5 ppb2013 — 6 ppb2014 — 4.3 ppb2016 — 9 ppb2017 — 1 ppb2019 — 1.9 ppb2020 — 0 ppb2022 — 3 ppb2023 — 0.50 ppb2024 — 7.1 ppb2025 — 3 ppb23199320072013201920242025

Up 1 ppb since 1993. Latest reading: 3 ppb (2025) — 20% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

Copper, 90th percentilemg/L · lower is better
00.5011.52EPA action level · 1.3 mg/L2022 — 1.7 mg/L2024 — 1.6 mg/L1.71.620222024

Down 0.07 mg/L since 2022. The latest reading (1.6 mg/L, 2024) is over the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Esperance (T)'s water comes from

Esperance (T)'s drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Local treatment

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

2 systems

2 water systems, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

560 people

Residents served across Esperance (T)'s service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 560 people through 2 water systems.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
CENTRAL BRIDGE WATER DISTRICT NY4700093 560 Surface Water
CREEKSIDE VILLAGE MHP NY4710781 115 Groundwater

Water bodies near Esperance (T)

Little Schoharie Creek · river Schoharie Creek · river Fox Creek · river Cobleskill Creek · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Esperance (T)'s drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Esperance (T)'s watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

8 federal disaster declarations on record for Schoharie County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

HURRICANE HENRI Aug 2021 · DR-3565
HURRICANE SANDY Oct 2012 · DR-3351
HURRICANE IRENE Aug 2011 · DR-4020

06How Esperance (T) compares

Scores for nearby New York cities on one line, with the average marked.

New York (C)
89 · A-
Smithtown (T)
84.8 · B+
Islip (T)
71.8 · B-
Esperance (T) (this city)
70.2 · B-

dashed line = New York average (78/100)

Esperance (T) scores 70.2/100below the New York average of 78/100. It outscores 2 of 10 nearby cities. Full New York rankings →

Schoharie water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Esperance (T)'s water — not generic advice.

Because of pfas

Filter drinking & cooking water

Activated carbon or reverse osmosis filter. 1 PFAS compound detected

Compare tested filters →
Know your report

Read your utility's annual report

Every utility must publish a yearly Consumer Confidence Report with its own testing results. It pairs well with the independent data on this page.

How to read a CCR →
Stay informed

Watch for Esperance (T) alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Esperance (T), NY tap water safe to drink?

Esperance (T)'s water quality earned a grade of B- (70.2/100). Some concerns have been identified. Consider a water filter for an extra layer of protection. The city ranks #689 out of 810 cities tested in New York.

What contaminants are in Esperance (T)'s water?

Lead was measured at 3.0 ppb (90th percentile). 1 PFAS compound was detected. 134 violations are on record.

How is Esperance (T)'s water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Esperance (T)?

PFAS compounds have been detected. A filter with activated carbon can help reduce exposure.

Where does Esperance (T)'s water come from?

Esperance (T)'s water is sourced from Surface water. The city has 2 water systems serving approximately 560 residents.

What health violations has Esperance (T)'s water system had?

Esperance (T) has 94 health-based violations on record. The most recent violation was recorded in July 2025. Health-based violations mean the water exceeded EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for a regulated substance. 6 violations remain unresolved.

How does Esperance (T)'s water compare to other cities?

Esperance (T) ranks #689 out of 810 cities in New York (better than 15% of state cities) and #10647 out of 15382 cities nationally (31th percentile). The grade of B- reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.