Skip to main content
WaterVerge

Water quality report · updated Jul 2026

Is Center Line, MI Tap Water Safe to Drink?

Graded B+, with 5 unresolved violations on record. See what was cited — and what it means for your tap. What to do ↓

0 contaminants over a legal limit
5.9 ppb lead, 90th percentile
5 unresolved violations
8K people served by 1 water system

PWSID MI0001290 · high data confidence · local government utility

Reviewed by WaterVerge Editorial Team · Last updated July 2026
B 84.2 / 100

#271 of 513Michigan cities
How we grade →

01The verdict: is Center Line water safe?

Center Line's drinking water has significant quality concerns based on EPA testing data. With a grade of B+ (84.2/100), the system has issues across multiple categories. A water filter is recommended for all residents. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 8,257 residents using surface water (rivers, lakes, or reservoirs).

The concern

5 unresolved violations on record

EPA records show open compliance items for this system. Most are administrative, but unresolved items are worth watching.

See what was cited ↓
The good news

No forever chemicals detected

UCMR 5 laboratory testing found no PFAS compounds above detection thresholds in this system.

See PFAS results ↓
Keep watching

3 violations in the last five years

Recent compliance history is the best predictor of future problems — the year-by-year record is below.

See the record ↓

Center Line's drinking water received a grade of B+ (84.2 out of 100), indicating good water quality. The city's 1 water system serves approximately 8,257 residents using purchased surface water.

Lead levels were measured at 5.9 ppb (90th percentile), which is within EPA limits but above recommended levels. PFAS testing under UCMR 5 found no detectable forever chemicals. The system has 11 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 5 remain unresolved.

Center Line ranks #271 out of 513 cities in Michigan for water quality, placing it below average in the state. The city draws from surface water sources, which are more susceptible to seasonal runoff and agricultural contamination, requiring extensive multi-barrier treatment including coagulation, filtration, and disinfection. While lead levels are within EPA limits, they are above the recommended 5 ppb threshold that health organizations consider ideal. A point-of-use filter adds an extra layer of protection.

How the 84.2/100 breaks down Methodology →
ViolationsHistorical violation record including health-based and monitoring violations.
39.7 / 45B
Lead & CopperLead at 5.9 ppb (90th percentile).
18 / 20A
ContaminantsNo PFAS compounds detected.
19.5 / 20A
ComplianceMonitoring and reporting compliance with EPA regulations.
3 / 10F
Source RiskWater source: Purchased surface water.
4 / 5B

02What's in Center Line's water

Every contaminant flagged in Center Line, on one shared scale: distance to its own legal limit. The red line is the limit — anything past it is out of compliance, and the closer a bar gets, the less headroom the system has.

1 detection · sorted by % of legal limit
Over the limit Elevated — watch Within limits
0 50% LEGAL LIMIT 150%
31 contaminants tested under EPA SDWIS, LCR and UCMR programs · 1 detected

Full contaminants report

Contaminant Detected Level EPA Limit Unit Category Status
Lead (90th percentile) 5.9 15 ppb Inorganic Safe
11Cl-PF3OUdS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
4:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
6:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
8:2 FTS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
ADONA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
HFPO-DA ND 0.01 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
lithium ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NEtFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NFDHA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
NMeFOSAA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFBS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFDoA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFEESA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHpS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFHxS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMBA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFMPA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFNA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOA ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFOS ND 0.004 µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFPeS ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFTrDA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
PFUnA ND HI µg/L PFAS Not Detected
Data source: EPA SDWIS, UCMR 5, local utility CCR.

03Center Line's ten-year track record

Each box is one year. A green check means no EPA violations; a numbered badge counts that year's violations — red if any were health-based, amber if they were monitoring or paperwork issues. The system has 11 violations on record, including 0 health-based violations. 5 remain unresolved.

6 of the last ten years were clean. The numbered years had EPA violations — red when any were health-based, amber when they were paperwork or missed-testing issues.

5 monitoring & paperwork 3 still unresolved
UpdateWater quality data updatedLatest EPA compliance and testing data incorporated into Center Line's water quality assessment. Grade: B+ (84.2/100).
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES, AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4757). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
Violation1 drinking water violation recordedContaminants: Lead and Copper Rule.Open
DisasterSEVERE STORMS AND FLOODINGFederal disaster declaration (FEMA DR-4195). Flood event — may have impacted local water infrastructure.
Lead, 90th percentileppb · lower is better
05101520EPA action level · 15 ppb1992 — 15 ppb1997 — 5 ppb1998 — 7 ppb1999 — 12 ppb2000 — 1.5 ppb2001 — 0 ppb2002 — 2 ppb2005 — 3 ppb2008 — 0 ppb2011 — 0 ppb2014 — 2.3 ppb2017 — 6 ppb2019 — 7.5 ppb2020 — 2.5 ppb2021 — 7.9 ppb2022 — 5.3 ppb2023 — 3.9 ppb2024 — 5.6 ppb2025 — 5.9 ppb155.9199220002008201920232025

Down 9.1 ppb since 1992. Latest reading: 5.9 ppb (2025) — 39% of the action level. Sampled at higher-risk homes (90th percentile).

04Where Center Line's water comes from

Center Line's drinking water comes primarily from surface water sources such as rivers, lakes, or reservoirs.

Source

Purchased Surface Water

Rivers, lakes, or reservoirs — more exposed to runoff, agriculture, and seasonal swings than groundwater.

Treatment

Wholesale supplier

Multi-barrier treatment: coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA standards.

Distribution

1 system

1 water system, operated under local government ownership.

Delivery

8,257 people

Residents served across Center Line's service area.

Surface water systems require multi-stage treatment including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection to meet EPA Safe Drinking Water Act standards. These sources can be impacted by seasonal changes, stormwater runoff, upstream agriculture, and industrial discharge. The system is operated by local government ownership and serves approximately 8,257 people through 1 water system.

System namePWSIDPopulationSource
CENTER LINE, CITY OF MI0001290 8,257 Purchased Surface Water

Water bodies near Center Line

Clinton River · river Red Run · river Plum Brook · river North Branch Clinton River · river

As a surface-water system, these water bodies may directly influence Center Line's drinking water supply.

05Pressure on Center Line's watershed

Outside forces that shape what reaches the treatment plant. None of these is a verdict on the tap by itself — but each adds pressure worth knowing about.

Industrial discharge

Present — monitored

5 facilities within 10 miles reported 28 lb released to surface water in the latest EPA Toxics Release Inventory. Proximity doesn't equal tap contamination — treatment and hydrology decide — but it's pressure on the watershed.

DETROIT COATING LLC — zinc compounds 15 lb · 4.6 mi
A.G. SIMPSON (USA) INC. — nickel and nickel compounds 8 lb · 4.4 mi
K C JONES PLATING CO — zinc compounds 3 lb · 4.1 mi
+ 2 more facilities

Flood & storm history

Recurring — declared disasters

7 federal disaster declarations on record for Macomb County. Flooding and severe storms can overwhelm treatment plants, cause sewage overflows, and push runoff into supplies.

SEVERE STORMS, TORNADOES, AND FLOODING Feb 2024 · DR-4757
SEVERE STORMS AND FLOODING Sep 2014 · DR-4195
HURRICANE KATRINA EVACUATION Sep 2005 · DR-3225

Superfund proximity

Low — tracked and monitored

1 National Priorities List site within 10 miles. Proximity does not necessarily indicate tap-water contamination — the connection depends on hydrology and treatment.

06How Center Line compares

Scores for nearby Michigan cities on one line, with the average marked.

Center Line (this city)
84.2 · B+
Detroit
84.1 · B+
Grand Rapids
70.2 · B-
Lansing
57.3 · C-
Ann Arbor
51.5 · D+
Kalamazoo
35 · F

dashed line = Michigan average (70/100)

Center Line scores 84.2/100above the Michigan average of 70/100. It outscores 6 of 10 nearby cities. Full Michigan rankings →

Macomb water quality rankings
Compare all cities in the county — grades, violations, and contaminant data side by side.

07What to do at home

Steps matched to what testing actually found in Center Line's water — not generic advice.

Because of lead

Filter drinking & cooking water

NSF-certified water filter. Lead detected at 5.9 ppb

Compare tested filters →
Because lead was detected

Flush taps & check your service line

Lead leaches from pipes as water sits. Run cold water 30 seconds before drinking (especially mornings), and ask the utility whether your address still has a lead service line.

Lead risks explained →
Stay informed

Watch for Center Line alerts

This area has a history of flood declarations — after severe weather, watch for boil-water advisories from the utility, and check the live alerts on this page.

All water alerts →

Frequently asked questions

Is Center Line, MI tap water safe to drink?

Center Line's water quality earned a grade of B+ (84.2/100). The water generally meets EPA standards and is considered safe for consumption. The city ranks #271 out of 513 cities tested in Michigan.

What contaminants are in Center Line's water?

Lead was measured at 5.9 ppb (90th percentile). No PFAS compounds were detected. 11 violations are on record.

How is Center Line's water quality grade calculated?

The grade is based on four factors: violation history (40%), lead and copper levels (25%), PFAS contamination (25%), and regulatory compliance (10%). The score is also adjusted based on how complete the available data is. See our methodology page for full details.

Do I need a water filter in Center Line?

While lead levels are within EPA limits, a filter adds extra protection. Based on current data, basic filtration should suffice for additional peace of mind.

Where does Center Line's water come from?

Center Line's water is sourced from Purchased surface water. The city has 1 water system serving approximately 8,257 residents.

How does Center Line's water compare to other cities?

Center Line ranks #271 out of 513 cities in Michigan (better than 47% of state cities) and #5979 out of 15382 cities nationally (61th percentile). The grade of B+ reflects the combined assessment of violation history, lead and copper levels, PFAS contamination, and regulatory compliance.

Share this reportHelp others learn about their water quality
WhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInEmail
About Center Line, MI: Center Line is a city in Macomb County in the U.S. state of Michigan. An inner-ring suburb of Metro Detroit, Center Line is located roughly 11 miles (17.7 km) north of downtown Detroit, and is completely surrounded by the larger city of Warren. As of the 2020 census, the city had a population of 8,552. Median household income $52,067 · median home value $134,192 · median age 41.2 · 55.3% homeowners · 17.3% college educated. Wikipedia → Service area: 1 ZIP code across Macomb.
Show ZIP codes 48015
Sources: EPA SDWIS & ECHO · UCMR 3–5 · Lead & Copper Rule samples · EPA TRI · U.S. Drought Monitor · FEMA declarations. Data last updated Jul 2026. Analysis by the WaterVerge Editorial Team · methodology.